|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What If
What if there are 30 trillion planets in the universe 2,000 miles in
diameter,or more?. We have now found 20 stars with jupiter size planets,and that is because we can't see the effect of smaller earth size planets which like in our solar system are there. Now I read there are two binary neutron stars systems,and in each system they found two three times bigger than than earth size planets in each of these neutron binary system. I would think such fast revolving neutron stars would be the worst area to find planets,and I am sure it was a lucky find. Since that is such unlikely place,we than must not rule out the 90% of stars that are like our sun have an average of 9 planets., and there must be planets that are out there,but have not been capture by a star,as yet Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What If
What if we have a big universe horizon problems? Lets think in the other
direction and say the universe "is" being slowed down by gravity. That means the universe was expanding faster in the distant past. That means when the universe was,say,one thousand times smaller,it was in fact"more than ten thousand times younger" All this could be reality,and best to think in every direction. In my theory why things got clustered it was due to a blackhole,or micro blackholes,or both,in a set area of space(no homogenized space) and these gravitational areas is responsible for the formation of stars,and galaxies. Its again gravity all the way down. I have received email asking me to say when its my own theory,and not in a text book. I don't say its my theory to flatter my ego(it does however) Bert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What If
What if even with the great energies of supernovas there is nothing to
compare with the energy of the big bang.? We could go with space density that came out of BB. However I was thinking of Monopoles.I read in a book that they are immensely heavy,a million billion times heavier than a proton.(that is a lot of mass) That tells us it would need an immense amount of energy to make them. Where are these monopoles now? These monopoles could be added to the universes dark matter(yes) Well the universe thanks to gravity has evolved so much in the last 15 billion years and nature used this time to hid her secretes Bert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What If
Bert wrote,
However I was thinking of Monopoles...... Where are these monopoles now? Presumably you're referring to magnetic monopoles. If magnetism is defined as the spin component of flowing space (as in a magnet's lines of force being spinning flux tubes or 'mini wormholes', to the great looping prominances on the sun), it'd be pretty hard to picture a monopolar form of magnetism. A planet or a star is a _gravitic_ monopole because the spatial inflow has no spin; it's just a 'reverse starburst' flow into the center of mass. By the very nature of its spin component, magnetism has to be bipolar (under the spatial-flow model, that is). Wolter made the tongue-in-cheek remark that magnetic monopoles are right under our noses all the time. Every current-carrying (electrical) conductor is a magnetic monopole. The circular field surrounding the wire is of one magnetic sign (either 'N' or 'S'), with the "missing" pole residing at the geometric and quantum center of the wire.. making the wire in effect a 'magnetic monopole'. If a piece of iron is put into the field, it becomes magnetized and bipolar, restoring the wire's 'missing' pole. oc |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What If
Hi oc Monopoles only have one magnetic pole is it positive or
negative?. Lets say they are negative in our universe,and positive in our parrel universe.(why not?) I don't think we will ever have an accelerator big and powerful enough to move them. With that kind of great mass maybe they have become super blackholes?? There I go again Sally was right my thoughts are getting harder and harder to stifle. Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What If
Bert wrote,
Monopoles only have one magnetic pole is it positive or negative? Well, if such a critter exists in nature, a magnetic monopole's polarity would be designated by its 'sign', either North or South. Under the spatial-flow model of magnetism, a monopole would have to be a sphere with all its lines of force (spinning flux tubes or 'mini wormholes') running into the sphere omnidirectionally, like a 'reverse starburst'. The monopole's 'sign' would be determined by the flux tubes' spin direction; *all* the inbound flux tubes would be spinning in the same direction going in if the monopole is 'N', and in the opposite direction if it's 'S'. In a normal magnet, the 'N' flux tubes spin clockwise going in and the 'S' flux tubes spin counter-clockwise going in (under Wolter's model). Lindner has not yet developed a spatial-flow model of magnetism or dealt with theories on magnetic monopoles. Wolter did not believe they exist in nature, apart from his humorous quip about electrical conductors being 'magnetic monopoles'. oc |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What If
What if my search for sameness gave me these thoughts? The closes my
mind can see some of string theories curled dimensions is by comparing them with the double helix DNA The closes I can come to visualizing the membrane of a one cell life form is comparing the membrane to the surface tension of a drop of water, Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|