#751
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 2, 6:07*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 2, 8:38*pm, Brad Guth wrote: And? Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave. Both are aether displacement waves. Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics. So, where's your personal Google Group? Where's your Nobel? Where's anything that uses aether for the greater good? |
#752
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 6, 10:14*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Dec 2, 6:07*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 2, 8:38*pm, Brad Guth wrote: And? Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave. Both are aether displacement waves. Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics. So, where's your personal Google Group? Where's your Nobel? Where's anything that uses aether for the greater good? Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave. Both are aether displacement waves. Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics. |
#753
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 6, 7:39*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 6, 10:14*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 2, 6:07*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 2, 8:38*pm, Brad Guth wrote: And? Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave. Both are aether displacement waves. Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics. So, where's your personal Google Group? Where's your Nobel? Where's anything that uses aether for the greater good? Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. Non-baryonic dark matter was never anchored to the matter in the first place. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's pilot-wave. Both are aether displacement waves. Aether displaced by matter relates general relativity and quantum mechanics. Are you and your aether about stuck at this point? |
#754
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 6, 11:46*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
Are you and your aether about stuck at this point? "It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense." - Albert Einstein The relativistic ether referred to by Laughlin is the ether which propagates light referred to by Einstein |
#755
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 7, 5:19*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 6, 11:46*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Are you and your aether about stuck at this point? "It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense." - Albert Einstein The relativistic ether referred to by Laughlin is the ether which propagates light referred to by Einstein And yet here you are, not smart enough to create a personal Google Group page or even a few aether web pages that modern physics can deal with. I happen to agree that either/aether propagates light, and perhaps understanding that quantum entangled photons can only exist because of aether. |
#756
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 7, 11:58*am, Brad Guth wrote:
And yet here you are, not smart enough to create a personal Google Group page or even a few aether web pages that modern physics can deal with. I happen to agree that either/aether propagates light, and perhaps understanding that quantum entangled photons can only exist because of aether. ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy "a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position" A 'field' in physics is space filled with aether and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position. Each of the plates in the Casimir effect displace the aether. The displaced aether which exists between the plates is pushing back toward each of the plates which causes the aether displaced by each of the plates which exists between the plates to offset. This aether is more at rest than the aether which is displaced by the plates which encompasses the plates. The reduced force associated with the aether which exists between the plates along with the displaced aether which encompasses the plates which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the plates causes the plates to be forced together. What occurs physically in nature in the Casimir effect is the same phenomenon as gravity. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. |
#757
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 7, 9:10*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 7, 11:58*am, Brad Guth wrote: And yet here you are, not smart enough to create a personal Google Group page or even a few aether web pages that modern physics can deal with. I happen to agree that either/aether propagates light, and perhaps understanding that quantum entangled photons can only exist because of aether. ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy "a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position" A 'field' in physics is space filled with aether and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position. Each of the plates in the Casimir effect displace the aether. The displaced aether which exists between the plates is pushing back toward each of the plates which causes the aether displaced by each of the plates which exists between the plates to offset. This aether is more at rest than the aether which is displaced by the plates which encompasses the plates. The reduced force associated with the aether which exists between the plates along with the displaced aether which encompasses the plates which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the plates causes the plates to be forced together. What occurs physically in nature in the Casimir effect is the same phenomenon as gravity. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Aether has mass and physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. And your nomination for that Nobel is on hold because??????? |
#758
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 7, 12:16*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
And your nomination for that Nobel is on hold because??????? 'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical' http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34735679.../#.TjkpbmDmE2c The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how the Milky Way was created, how the disk and halo formed and why the rotational speed can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter of the Milky Way itself. |
#759
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 7, 9:22*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 7, 12:16*pm, Brad Guth wrote: And your nomination for that Nobel is on hold because??????? 'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34735679/ns/technology_and_science-space/... The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how the Milky Way was created, how the disk and halo formed and why the rotational speed can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter of the Milky Way itself. And your nomination for that Nobel is on hold because??????? |
#760
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 12/7/2012 11:58 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
The relativistic ether referred to by Laughlin is the ether which propagates light referred to by Einstein And yet here you are, not smart enough to create a personal Google Group page or even a few aether web pages that modern physics can deal with. I happen to agree that either/aether propagates light, and perhaps understanding that quantum entangled photons can only exist because of aether. Dear MP3- I have good news and I have bad news. The good news is that you have made a convert to ether. The bad news is that it's Brad Goth. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 01:50 PM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs att | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 16th 05 08:54 AM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs attache | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 15th 05 12:22 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |