|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pappy Sets the Record Straight on 51-L
"Jon Berndt" wrote:
CASE CLOSED Outstanding work, Jon. This should be considered required reading for any new sci.space.* visitors. Please add to your web review at: http://www.hal-pc.org/~jsb/conspiracy.html My web review of "Betrayal" can be found at: http://home.austin.rr.com/sts51lvideo/ Roger -- Roger Balettie former Flight Dynamics Officer Space Shuttle Mission Control http://www.balettie.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pile On, Rog -- What Do You Have to Lose?
Roger Balettie wrote in message
. .. Outstanding work, Jon. It's a load of Texas steer manure, as always, **Lockheed style**. -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Step in This, Burnt
In late October 1987, AF Col. Ed O'Connor (who directed the
51-L debris recovery) confirmed an in-cloud booster crossing. =========================================== DANIEL MAXSON: Do the SRBs -- or did they -- cross in the clouds? COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya, the feeling is they did. What happened is when the aft fixture failed, that SRB rotated out. So that's why the thrust would force it to *cross* -- after the *forward* section failed -- cross the path of the other which was still *attached*! DANIEL MAXSON: Ya but -- but they were held *together*. I was told by a NASA expert the SRBs were held together by a big *ring* of the thrust structure of the external tank. Otherwise they would have immediately exited the cloud. And that they went maybe a half-second held together by some kind of an ET *ring* frame. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Well, there's *two* things that holds it together. At the *rear* there's a heavy ring for attachment, and that's where the *failure* occurred, heating one of those struts that holds them together and then *ripping* the rest of it out. In the *top* structure, there's a thrust *beam* that goes through the intertank area. There's some *ancillary* stuff there. The forward *held* for a little bit. DANIEL MAXSON: And it allowed them to cross. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya. DANIEL MAXSON: Okay. =========================================== [Given probable cause, a federal judge can order an 'in camera' inspection of classified (in this case SENSITIVE) film data.] -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) Jon Berndt wrote in message ... Is that the way they do it in Iowa? Step in "it"; open mouth; insert foot? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Roll in This, WhoreHay
In late October 1987, AF Col. Ed O'Connor (who directed the
51-L debris recovery) confirmed an in-cloud booster crossing. =========================================== DANIEL MAXSON: Do the SRBs -- or did they -- cross in the clouds? COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya, the feeling is they did. What happened is when the aft fixture failed, that SRB rotated out. So that's why the thrust would force it to *cross* -- after the *forward* section failed -- cross the path of the other which was still *attached*! DANIEL MAXSON: Ya but -- but they were held *together*. I was told by a NASA expert the SRBs were held together by a big *ring* of the thrust structure of the external tank. Otherwise they would have immediately exited the cloud. And that they went maybe a half-second held together by some kind of an ET *ring* frame. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Well, there's *two* things that holds it together. At the *rear* there's a heavy ring for attachment, and that's where the *failure* occurred, heating one of those struts that holds them together and then *ripping* the rest of it out. In the *top* structure, there's a thrust *beam* that goes through the intertank area. There's some *ancillary* stuff there. The forward *held* for a little bit. DANIEL MAXSON: And it allowed them to cross. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya. DANIEL MAXSON: Okay. =========================================== [Given probable cause, a federal judge can order an 'in camera' inspection of classified (in this case SENSITIVE) film data.] -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) Jorge R. Frank wrote in message ... It's the sound of a John Thomas being swatted across the snout with the rolled-up newspaper of Truth. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Roll in This, WhoreHay
"John Maxson" wrote in message
... In late October 1987, AF Col. Ed O'Connor (who directed the 51-L debris recovery) confirmed an in-cloud booster crossing. I am just wondering if Colonel O Connor ever saw the original film. snip pickled red herring [Given probable cause, a federal judge can order an 'in camera' inspection of classified (in this case SENSITIVE) film data.] And if some federal judge did see the film and told you that you were wrong, that judge would join the ever growing list of conspiritors right? -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Austin's Bob Mosley III Leads Vicious 'Shoot the 51-L Messenger' Campaign
In late October 1987, AF Col. Ed O'Connor (who directed the
51-L debris recovery) confirmed an in-cloud booster crossing. =========================================== DANIEL MAXSON: Do the SRBs -- or did they -- cross in the clouds? COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya, the feeling is they did. What happened is when the aft fixture failed, that SRB rotated out. So that's why the thrust would force it to *cross* -- after the *forward* section failed -- cross the path of the other which was still *attached*! DANIEL MAXSON: Ya but -- but they were held *together*. I was told by a NASA expert the SRBs were held together by a big *ring* of the thrust structure of the external tank. Otherwise they would have immediately exited the cloud. And that they went maybe a half-second held together by some kind of an ET *ring* frame. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Well, there's *two* things that holds it together. At the *rear* there's a heavy ring for attachment, and that's where the *failure* occurred, heating one of those struts that holds them together and then *ripping* the rest of it out. In the *top* structure, there's a thrust *beam* that goes through the intertank area. There's some *ancillary* stuff there. The forward *held* for a little bit. DANIEL MAXSON: And it allowed them to cross. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya. DANIEL MAXSON: Okay. =========================================== [Given probable cause, a federal judge can order an 'in camera' inspection of classified (in this case SENSITIVE) film data.] -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) Charleston wrote in message news:xA1Ua.38902$zy.2388@fed1read06... snipped the snot |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Austin's Bob Mosley III Leads Vicious 'Shoot the 51-L Messenger' Campaign
"John Maxson" wrote in message
... In late October 1987, AF Col. Ed O'Connor (who directed the 51-L debris recovery) confirmed an in-cloud booster crossing.... Did you read Doug's post about psychosis? You know you don't have to prove him right, but you are doing just that. You know the lack of quotes is what gave it away;-) =========================================== DANIEL MAXSON: Do the SRBs -- or did they -- cross in the clouds? COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya, the feeling is they did. What happened is when the aft fixture failed, that SRB rotated out. So that's why the thrust would force it to *cross* -- after the *forward* section failed -- cross the path of the other which was still *attached*! DANIEL MAXSON: Ya but -- but they were held *together*. I was told by a NASA expert the SRBs were held together by a big *ring* of the thrust structure of the external tank. Otherwise they would have immediately exited the cloud. And that they went maybe a half-second held together by some kind of an ET *ring* frame. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Well, there's *two* things that holds it together. At the *rear* there's a heavy ring for attachment, and that's where the *failure* occurred, heating one of those struts that holds them together and then *ripping* the rest of it out. In the *top* structure, there's a thrust *beam* that goes through the intertank area. There's some *ancillary* stuff there. The forward *held* for a little bit. DANIEL MAXSON: And it allowed them to cross. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya. DANIEL MAXSON: Okay. =========================================== -- Daniel Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Austin's Bob Mosley III Leads Vicious 'Shoot the 51-L Messenger' Campaign
===========================================
DANIEL MAXSON: Do the SRBs -- or did they -- cross in the clouds? COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya, the feeling is they did. What happened is when the aft fixture failed, that SRB rotated out. So that's why the thrust would force it to *cross* -- after the *forward* section failed -- cross the path of the other which was still *attached*! DANIEL MAXSON: Ya but -- but they were held *together*. I was told by a NASA expert the SRBs were held together by a big *ring* of the thrust structure of the external tank. Otherwise they would have immediately exited the cloud. And that they went maybe a half-second held together by some kind of an ET *ring* frame. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Well, there's *two* things that holds it together. At the *rear* there's a heavy ring for attachment, and that's where the *failure* occurred, heating one of those struts that holds them together and then *ripping* the rest of it out. In the *top* structure, there's a thrust *beam* that goes through the intertank area. There's some *ancillary* stuff there. The forward *held* for a little bit. DANIEL MAXSON: And it allowed them to cross. COL. ED O'CONNOR: Ya. DANIEL MAXSON: Okay. =========================================== -- John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace) Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com) Charleston wrote in message news:v%2Ua.39792$zy.12003@fed1read06... Did you read Doug's post about psychosis? Do you read? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pile On, Rog -- What Do You Have to Lose?
"ON NASA ORIGINAL FILMS: In the original film you see the lower rocket
*does* have a ring and the ring on the upper rocket is caused by a shadow thrown by the sun on a displaced frustrum creating a black shadow that indeed looks like the black stripe." "John Maxson It's a load of Texas steer manure, as always. Thanks Maxson, and **** you. This aspect of the "crossing" wordage always intrigued me.....the stripe thing. A few months ago I looked at the photo evidence and determined that the photo was poor, but that it was possible to determine, that the so-called wide stripe was not there.....that the stripes were where they were supposed to be. John Berndt "After viewing the original NASA film at the Cape, Pappy and the other individual[s] there viewing the film smiled and nodded in agreement that the SRBs had NOT crossed. " Good. It was a silly idea to start with. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pappy Sets the Record Straight on 51-L
"Roger Balettie" wrote in message news:BX%
"Jon Berndt" wrote: CASE CLOSED Outstanding work, Jon. This should be considered required reading for any new sci.space.* visitors. Please add to your web review at: http://www.hal-pc.org/~jsb/conspiracy.html My web review of "Betrayal" can be found at: http://home.austin.rr.com/sts51lvideo/ Roger Yep ... it will end up there. Jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Astronaut Breaks US Space Endurance Record | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 7 | December 11th 03 12:17 PM |
NASA Astronaut Breaks US Space Endurance Record | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 6 | December 10th 03 03:10 PM |
Another Solar Storm Reaches Earth; Largest Flare On Record | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 7th 03 04:12 PM |
In Pappy's Own Words | John Maxson | Space Shuttle | 143 | August 8th 03 05:53 AM |
In Pappy's Own Words | John Maxson | History | 50 | August 6th 03 03:46 AM |