A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

OMS pod engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 9th 07, 05:58 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
John H[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default OMS pod engines

Right after SRB sep, I heard the MCC PAO say that the propulsion officer has
just anounced that the OMS engines had ignited to help
give the orbitor a "kick in the pants" for the next 1:30 to assist orbital
insertion... do these ignite at this time during each flight or was there
soemthing during this flight that necessiated extra boost?
thanks
John


  #2  
Old August 9th 07, 06:09 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
John H[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default OMS pod engines


"John H" wrote in message
...
Right after SRB sep, I heard the MCC PAO say that the propulsion officer
has just anounced that the OMS engines had ignited to help
give the orbitor a "kick in the pants" for the next 1:30 to assist orbital
insertion... do these ignite at this time during each flight or was there
soemthing during this flight that necessiated extra boost?
thanks
John


oh well, I just read someplace they do assist in insertion, I guess I just
never heard
the PAO announce it before so dramatically..

BTW I loved the way he described Barbara Morgans ascent "racing into space
on the wings of a legacy" or something like that.


  #3  
Old August 9th 07, 06:15 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Jim in Houston[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 163
Default OMS pod engines

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:58:36 -0700, "John H" wrote:

Right after SRB sep, I heard the MCC PAO say that the propulsion officer has
just anounced that the OMS engines had ignited to help
give the orbitor a "kick in the pants" for the next 1:30 to assist orbital
insertion... do these ignite at this time during each flight or was there
soemthing during this flight that necessiated extra boost?
thanks
John

With the extra heavy payloads for ISS assembly it seems to have become
the norm for them to light up the OMS engines after staging. IIRC they
don't or didn't do this for satellite delivery or science missions.
Maybe one of the more knowledgeable folks will weigh in on this one.
But to answer your question it is because of the weight.
Jim in Houston.

Contrary to popular opinion RN does not mean Real Nerd!

Teddy Roosevelt's mother said: "Fill what is empty, empty what is full, and scratch where it itches"

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #4  
Old August 9th 07, 09:32 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Jason A. Ciastko
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default OMS pod engines


"Jim in Houston" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:58:36 -0700, "John H" wrote:

Right after SRB sep, I heard the MCC PAO say that the propulsion officer
has
just anounced that the OMS engines had ignited to help
give the orbitor a "kick in the pants" for the next 1:30 to assist orbital
insertion... do these ignite at this time during each flight or was there
soemthing during this flight that necessiated extra boost?
thanks
John

With the extra heavy payloads for ISS assembly it seems to have become
the norm for them to light up the OMS engines after staging. IIRC they
don't or didn't do this for satellite delivery or science missions.
Maybe one of the more knowledgeable folks will weigh in on this one.
But to answer your question it is because of the weight.
Jim in Houston.


IIRC, They decided to do that to get a little more performance as well as to
use it instead of dumping it overboard. I think it was on a thread here that
they decided to launch with full tanks and use the extra at lift off instead
of launching with enough to do the mission with reserve and possibly
partially fueled tanks.

Again, I may be mistaken, but that sticks in my mind.

JC
IN


  #5  
Old August 9th 07, 11:29 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle
Brian Thorn[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 186
Default OMS pod engines

On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:32:29 -0400, "Jason A. Ciastko"
wrote:

IIRC, They decided to do that to get a little more performance as well as to
use it instead of dumping it overboard. I think it was on a thread here that
they decided to launch with full tanks and use the extra at lift off instead
of launching with enough to do the mission with reserve and possibly
partially fueled tanks.


Exactly.

It's called the "OMS Assist".

Brian
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ion engines Raghar Policy 52 August 29th 07 09:10 PM
Ion engines and He3 Nick Hull Space Shuttle 6 December 15th 04 05:56 PM
Bussard ICF EXL engines George Technology 6 February 8th 04 06:44 PM
Multiple Engines??? Charles Talleyrand Policy 83 February 4th 04 06:41 PM
Air breathing Engines Stephenjkm Technology 32 February 3rd 04 04:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.