|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Heresy alert! [was WI: Lunar Gemini]
On 23 Jul 2003 08:56:44 -0700, (JGDeRuvo) wrote:
I hate to do another FTETTM reference, but in "1968" there's a great scene where Borman is in the design room at Downey talking about redesigning the hatch. The new hatch is put on and Borman sees what they're doing and says "wait a minute ..." He then grabs a chair and sits in the CM skeleton like he's seated and then shows the engineers why their design isn't going to work PRACTICALLY. ....However, on the flip side, did any of the Astronauts assigned to Bethpage and the LM give any input regarding the initial proposals to change from seated to standing during flight? That was all engineers, kids. ....But, to be fair, on the flipside of *that*, there is the issue of fitting square backpacks in round hatches after the need for a round hatch had already been eliminated :-) OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Heresy alert! [was WI: Lunar Gemini]
In article ,
om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy... _facility.org says... On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:32:27 GMT, Doug... wrote: But many non-astronauts, like Max Faget, Caldwell Johnson, Tom Kelly, John Aaron, Chris Kraft and Gene Kranz, among others, also got a lot of press and had their contributions recognized. ...And let's not forget Rocco Petrone, Gunter Wendt, Skip Chauvin, Bill Tindall, Shorty Powers, Dee O'Hara and Dr. Chuck Berry. Even Joe Shea was getting positive press prior to A1. ...So again, I ask John just what *was* his motivation for the statement he made? Not trying to slam him, but just trying to understand where he was coming from. Well, I did say "among many others," LOL. And motivation was my question, too. Seems like an agenda-laden post that we're all responding to -- it's just that the agenda doesn't seem clear. -- It's not the pace of life I mind; | Doug Van Dorn it's the sudden stop at the end... | |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
WI: Lunar Gemini
Finally continuing on I had the Apollo 4 flight destroying (by the pogo problems that happened on 6) itself resulted in serious delays in the Saturn program. NASA choose to go with a with a Gemini Landing program... At which point, with the lunar landing goal already accomplished, the government would have cancelled the troubled Saturn program, and Apollo along with it. ... followed by later landings with Apollo. IMO, it never would have gotten the chance. So? He's making something for Orbiter... it can be as plausible (or implausable) as he wants. Personally, I'm looking forward to trying to fly a lunar gemini. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Heresy alert! [was WI: Lunar Gemini]
OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message . ..
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:42:30 GMT, Doug... wrote: I think that was, once again, an issue driven by Pete Conrad. He had a *lot* of say in the final LM cockpit configuration. That's one big reason why he was backing up the first LM checkout flight -- Deke and the rest of the Crew Operations Division wanted Conrad's expertise available to McDivitt and his crew. ...There is one thing that I wish I'd had the chance to ask Tom Kelly before his recent passing. At what point during LM development did Conrad or any NASA Astronaut or non-Astronaut first have input into what the cockpit control arrangement should be like? Did they have any input into the original five-legged, four-windowed, two docking port model at all, or was NASA input relegated just to specs and not actual layout? At the Glenn L. Martin Museum, we have photos of early Martin design LEM development. I have seen a photo of Conrad and a Martin co. test pilot evaluating the cockpit of a LEM mockup. It still had seats and the ascent stage resembled a helicopter nose section. I'm not sure of the date of the pic. So this ,I believe, kind of backs up the notion that Conrad had a fair bit of say in LEM cockpit layout. Conrad visited at least two competitors(Martin and Grumman) to evaluate and review designs. I think it's safe to assume he visited other aerospace firms bidding on the LEM. After viewing each mock up I wonder if he was able to inform each contractor about the designs of their competitor. I'm not sure when Grumman was awarded the LEM contract. Gene |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Heresy alert! [was WI: Lunar Gemini]
On 24 Jul 2003 14:11:06 -0700, (Gene
DiGennaro) wrote: I'm not sure when Grumman was awarded the LEM contract. ....Grumman was awarded the $350M contract in September 1962, with five major subcontractors along for the ride: Bell Aerosystems (Ascent Engine), Hamilton Standard (ECS), Marquardt (RCS), Rocketdyne (Descent Engine) and Raytheon (Computer Systems). ....What I'm curious about are two things: 1) Who were the other 8 or 9 contractors bidding for the LM? 2) What were their proposals? OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
WI: Lunar Gemini
"Bob Martin" wrote in
: Finally continuing on I had the Apollo 4 flight destroying (by the pogo problems that happened on 6) itself resulted in serious delays in the Saturn program. NASA choose to go with a with a Gemini Landing program... At which point, with the lunar landing goal already accomplished, the government would have cancelled the troubled Saturn program, and Apollo along with it. ... followed by later landings with Apollo. IMO, it never would have gotten the chance. So? He's making something for Orbiter... Correct... and I said I was looking forward to it. it can be as plausible (or implausable) as he wants. Of course. And I can give my opinion on its plausibility... or did someone pass a law when I wasn't looking? -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Heresy alert! [was WI: Lunar Gemini]
OM om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote in message . ..
...Grumman was awarded the $350M contract in September 1962, with five major subcontractors along for the ride: Bell Aerosystems (Ascent Engine), Hamilton Standard (ECS), Marquardt (RCS), Rocketdyne (Descent Engine) and Raytheon (Computer Systems). ...What I'm curious about are two things: 1) Who were the other 8 or 9 contractors bidding for the LM? 2) What were their proposals? OM Doesn't Mark Wade's site have some info on the other Apollo LEM bids? I haven't seen any illustrations of LEM proposals on his site though. The Martin design, IIRC had a spherical ascent stage with heleicopter style windows. This sat upon the descent stage that looked like it was made from corrugated aluminum. I think there were 5 legs too. I'll have to go back and look at the picture again. I don't have it handy. Gene |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Heresy alert! [was WI: Lunar Gemini]
rk said:
Kevin Willoughby wrote: Wasn't there an Assimov story Perhaps it was "Spell My Name With [one] S" Ouch! I guess last night was my night for minor errors. -- Kevin Willoughby lid We'd spend the remaining time trying to fix the engine. -- Neil Armstrong |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lunar base and space manufacturing books for sale | Martin Bayer | Space Shuttle | 0 | May 1st 04 04:57 PM |
Lunar base and space manufacturing books for sale | Martin Bayer | Policy | 0 | May 1st 04 04:57 PM |
Lunar Transport System Components | Alex Terrell | Technology | 12 | April 6th 04 04:34 AM |
Lunar Transport System Components | Alex Terrell | Policy | 13 | February 16th 04 11:13 PM |
Arecibo Radar Shows No Evidence of Thick Ice At Lunar Poles | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 12th 03 06:02 PM |