|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
What is a Zombie world? It is a world in which experimental evidence
counts for nothing and where everyone is programmed to always say "Jawohl" OR "Da moi lidera". DA MOI LIDERA http://www.boop.org/jan/justso/elephant.htm Acquired characteristics according to Kipling. Was the child a cow or a bull? Kipling does not say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trofim_Lysenko Lysenko http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism It isn't just me that links Lysenko to Deutsche Physik. Wikipaedia does just the same thing. JAWOHL MEIN FÜHRER http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/uf...foaleman_6.htm http://www.eyepod.org/Nazi-Disc-Photos.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_UFOs If Zundel’s own account is to be believed – and I think it probably is – then his fictions about Nazi UFOs have funded the distribution of Holocaust revisionist material around a substantial part of the world. So, at the end of the day, there’s more at stake here than just tall tales and technological fantasies; there would appear to be a good ethical argument to stop repeating such fictions and to put the ‘Nazi UFO’ myths to rest once and for all. I think there is indeed more at stake, more at stake than just Relativity. There are also Nazi sympathisers in the various intelligence services. http://www.stevequayle.com/High.Jump...Andromeda.html This is real "Betrug". The touch of authenticity is given to what is in essence FRAUD. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vril Vril was supposed to have been the Atlantean language. It consisted of a series of clicks. CIA They were taken in by all this crap, hook, line and sinker. They created their own version of the Zombie world. McCarthy even devised a zombie test. Truth in the zombie world is simply what is politically correct. - Ian Parker |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
Our Zionist/Nazi DARPA is still n charge of most everything that
matters. Truth has become at best secondary. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth Ian Parker wrote: What is a Zombie world? It is a world in which experimental evidence counts for nothing and where everyone is programmed to always say "Jawohl" OR "Da moi lidera". DA MOI LIDERA http://www.boop.org/jan/justso/elephant.htm Acquired characteristics according to Kipling. Was the child a cow or a bull? Kipling does not say. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trofim_Lysenko Lysenko http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism It isn't just me that links Lysenko to Deutsche Physik. Wikipaedia does just the same thing. JAWOHL MEIN F�HRER http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/uf...foaleman_6.htm http://www.eyepod.org/Nazi-Disc-Photos.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_UFOs If Zundel�s own account is to be believed � and I think it probably is � then his fictions about Nazi UFOs have funded the distribution of Holocaust revisionist material around a substantial part of the world. So, at the end of the day, there�s more at stake here than just tall tales and technological fantasies; there would appear to be a good ethical argument to stop repeating such fictions and to put the �Nazi UFO� myths to rest once and for all. I think there is indeed more at stake, more at stake than just Relativity. There are also Nazi sympathisers in the various intelligence services. http://www.stevequayle.com/High.Jump...Andromeda.html This is real "Betrug". The touch of authenticity is given to what is in essence FRAUD. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vril Vril was supposed to have been the Atlantean language. It consisted of a series of clicks. CIA They were taken in by all this crap, hook, line and sinker. They created their own version of the Zombie world. McCarthy even devised a zombie test. Truth in the zombie world is simply what is politically correct. - Ian Parker |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. So, what we say or think about reality doesn't impact reality at all. The only thing impacted by our thoughts and words is us. To the degree we understand reality and operate in the real world, to that degree we are effective and obtain those things we want from reality. To the degree we do not understand reality and do not operate in the real world, to that degree we are ineffective and are at risk of not achieving our goals. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
On Aug 16, 5:07 pm, wrote:
Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. So, what we say or think about reality doesn't impact reality at all. The only thing impacted by our thoughts and words is us. To the degree we understand reality and operate in the real world, to that degree we are effective and obtain those things we want from reality. To the degree we do not understand reality and do not operate in the real world, to that degree we are ineffective and are at risk of not achieving our goals. Without the cold hard truth there is no valid history or progress. (aka Hitler and GW Bush seem to more than prove this out) Mainstream lies, distortions and evidence exclusions about physics and of the mostly public funded science only begets more of the same. You seem to be at ease with all of it, just the way it is. ”Whoever controls the past, controls the future” / George Orwell meaning those in control of whatever gets officially recorded as history or whatever as having been discovered or created are also establishing and/or reinforcing upon their mainstream holy grail as to who gets future credit and/or blame, and thus more importantly of who gets first crack at whatever future credits and that of receiving our public support, instead of the gauntlet of continual denial, avoidance and systematic banishment. The very root of this kind of orchestrated naysay imposed action against outsiders is clearly faith-based and otherwise cloaked as to suggest that no one public agency, private group or inside connected individual(s) are ever in charge of anything that gets overlooked or goes terribly wrong. If the mainstream status quo on behalf of their public image damage- control didn’t have fingers, they’d have to point with something else each time things look bad or turn out poorly. (perhaps its their brown nose that'll have to due) ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
On 17 Aug, 01:07, wrote:
Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. So, what we say or think about reality doesn't impact reality at all. The only thing impacted by our thoughts and words is us. To the degree we understand reality and operate in the real world, to that degree we are effective and obtain those things we want from reality. To the degree we do not understand reality and do not operate in the real world, to that degree we are ineffective and are at risk of not achieving our goals. This is true, but also misleading. In the Physical World you can only produce an airplane that flies well by understanding the laws of aerodynamics, by putting your plane in a simulation and running hydrocodes. If on the other hand you base your theories on an intersaction between electromagnetism and gravity and carry a tank of Mercury you might get something that flies, but not well and by accident. What you say in untrue in the sense that:- 1) Good ideas need backing, and if money is being spent on daft ideas there is that much left to go round. 2) It is a truism that no country has ever voted in a Communist government. The same is true of a Nazi government. Even in Germany only about a third of the population actually voted for Hitler. In Pakistan no democratic potitician talks about being a Fascist or supporting the Taleban. The fact of having Nazis in the intelligence services is a real threat to everyone. No one, either in Iraq or the US actually voted for Saddam Hussein. If you had held a referendum in the US I doubt very much whether SH would have been put into power. Certainly the Iraqis NEVER voted for him. Mr Al Maliki (name means "King" in Arabic) may have many faults, but he is at least a democratic choice. To have the CIA (or the ISI) being a totally unelected body is dangerous for the rest of us. Antigravity and the frequency of anti Relativity postings indicate the views of some of these unelected officials. BTW - Could someone explain to me why antigravity is still heavily classified. It is crap and is known to be crap. If you want to safeguard yourself against Earth Crossing asteroids you need an accurate determination of orbit followed by a "nudge" of mm/ sec. General Relativity is therefore of great importance. Of course the anti Relativists are unconcerned. I recall that when I last posted on this topic the posting got hijacked by the right wing. I don't think they care about "reality". - Ian Parker |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
On Aug 17, 6:22 am, Ian Parker wrote:
On 17 Aug, 01:07, wrote: Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. So, what we say or think about reality doesn't impact reality at all. The only thing impacted by our thoughts and words is us. To the degree we understand reality and operate in the real world, to that degree we are effective and obtain those things we want from reality. To the degree we do not understand reality and do not operate in the real world, to that degree we are ineffective and are at risk of not achieving our goals. This is true, but also misleading. In the Physical World you can only produce an airplane that flies well by understanding the laws of aerodynamics, by putting your plane in a simulation and running hydrocodes. If on the other hand you base your theories on an intersaction between electromagnetism and gravity and carry a tank of Mercury you might get something that flies, but not well and by accident. What you say in untrue in the sense that:- 1) Good ideas need backing, and if money is being spent on daft ideas there is that much left to go round. 2) It is a truism that no country has ever voted in a Communist government. The same is true of a Nazi government. Even in Germany only about a third of the population actually voted for Hitler. In Pakistan no democratic potitician talks about being a Fascist or supporting the Taleban. The fact of having Nazis in the intelligence services is a real threat to everyone. No one, either in Iraq or the US actually voted for Saddam Hussein. If you had held a referendum in the US I doubt very much whether SH would have been put into power. Certainly the Iraqis NEVER voted for him. Mr Al Maliki (name means "King" in Arabic) may have many faults, but he is at least a democratic choice. To have the CIA (or the ISI) being a totally unelected body is dangerous for the rest of us. Antigravity and the frequency of anti Relativity postings indicate the views of some of these unelected officials. BTW - Could someone explain to me why antigravity is still heavily classified. It is crap and is known to be crap. If you want to safeguard yourself against Earth Crossing asteroids you need an accurate determination of orbit followed by a "nudge" of mm/ sec. General Relativity is therefore of great importance. Of course the anti Relativists are unconcerned. I recall that when I last posted on this topic the posting got hijacked by the right wing. I don't think they care about "reality". - Ian Parker Ian, I must admit to being totally confused by this thread. Are you stating that the CIA is behind the delusional postings on relativity being a fraud? Why would they bother? Did I miss something? Do you have evidence? The CIA is subject to oversight. Also, I always felt that one reason that the NSA hired boy scouts was to keep an eye on CIA. ;-) The ISI got spanked for their support of the Taliban. I once had a co- worker who was a retired officer in the Indian AF ask me why the US supported Pakistan. My reply was "Would you prefer a Pakistan where the US had no influence?" Who is Pakistan going to turn to? Russia or China? Ask the Afghanis and Tibetans, respectively, how that worked out. Rereading this, one final question. What does any of this have to do with physics? --Mike Jr |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
On Aug 17, 3:22 am, Ian Parker wrote:
On 17 Aug, 01:07, wrote: Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. So, what we say or think about reality doesn't impact reality at all. The only thing impacted by our thoughts and words is us. To the degree we understand reality and operate in the real world, to that degree we are effective and obtain those things we want from reality. To the degree we do not understand reality and do not operate in the real world, to that degree we are ineffective and are at risk of not achieving our goals. This is true, but also misleading. In the Physical World you can only produce an airplane that flies well by understanding the laws of aerodynamics, by putting your plane in a simulation and running hydrocodes. If on the other hand you base your theories on an intersaction between electromagnetism and gravity and carry a tank of Mercury you might get something that flies, but not well and by accident. What you say in untrue in the sense that:- 1) Good ideas need backing, and if money is being spent on daft ideas there is that much left to go round. Daft ideas are about the only things getting funded. Especially funded are those of inert eye-candy and thus faith-based failsafe sorts of daft ideas. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
On Aug 17, 7:48 pm, "Mike Jr." wrote:
On Aug 17, 6:22 am, Ian Parker wrote: On 17 Aug, 01:07, wrote: Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. So, what we say or think about reality doesn't impact reality at all. The only thing impacted by our thoughts and words is us. To the degree we understand reality and operate in the real world, to that degree we are effective and obtain those things we want from reality. To the degree we do not understand reality and do not operate in the real world, to that degree we are ineffective and are at risk of not achieving our goals. This is true, but also misleading. In the Physical World you can only produce an airplane that flies well by understanding the laws of aerodynamics, by putting your plane in a simulation and running hydrocodes. If on the other hand you base your theories on an intersaction between electromagnetism and gravity and carry a tank of Mercury you might get something that flies, but not well and by accident. What you say in untrue in the sense that:- 1) Good ideas need backing, and if money is being spent on daft ideas there is that much left to go round. 2) It is a truism that no country has ever voted in a Communist government. The same is true of a Nazi government. Even in Germany only about a third of the population actually voted for Hitler. In Pakistan no democratic potitician talks about being a Fascist or supporting the Taleban. The fact of having Nazis in the intelligence services is a real threat to everyone. No one, either in Iraq or the US actually voted for Saddam Hussein. If you had held a referendum in the US I doubt very much whether SH would have been put into power. Certainly the Iraqis NEVER voted for him. Mr Al Maliki (name means "King" in Arabic) may have many faults, but he is at least a democratic choice. To have the CIA (or the ISI) being a totally unelected body is dangerous for the rest of us. Antigravity and the frequency of anti Relativity postings indicate the views of some of these unelected officials. BTW - Could someone explain to me why antigravity is still heavily classified. It is crap and is known to be crap. If you want to safeguard yourself against Earth Crossing asteroids you need an accurate determination of orbit followed by a "nudge" of mm/ sec. General Relativity is therefore of great importance. Of course the anti Relativists are unconcerned. I recall that when I last posted on this topic the posting got hijacked by the right wing. I don't think they care about "reality". - Ian Parker Ian, I must admit to being totally confused by this thread. Are you stating that the CIA is behind the delusional postings on relativity being a fraud? Why would they bother? Did I miss something? Do you have evidence? The CIA is subject to oversight. Also, I always felt that one reason that the NSA hired boy scouts was to keep an eye on CIA. ;-) The ISI got spanked for their support of the Taliban. I once had a co- worker who was a retired officer in the Indian AF ask me why the US supported Pakistan. My reply was "Would you prefer a Pakistan where the US had no influence?" Who is Pakistan going to turn to? Russia or China? Ask the Afghanis and Tibetans, respectively, how that worked out. Rereading this, one final question. What does any of this have to do with physics? --Mike Jr MI5/CIA (aka DARPA) does whatever makes them happy campers. There is no official public oversight of our intellectual and scientific cartel/ cable. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
On Aug 18, 12:11 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Aug 17, 7:48 pm, "Mike Jr." wrote: On Aug 17, 6:22 am, Ian Parker wrote: On 17 Aug, 01:07, wrote: Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists. So, what we say or think about reality doesn't impact reality at all. The only thing impacted by our thoughts and words is us. To the degree we understand reality and operate in the real world, to that degree we are effective and obtain those things we want from reality. To the degree we do not understand reality and do not operate in the real world, to that degree we are ineffective and are at risk of not achieving our goals. This is true, but also misleading. In the Physical World you can only produce an airplane that flies well by understanding the laws of aerodynamics, by putting your plane in a simulation and running hydrocodes. If on the other hand you base your theories on an intersaction between electromagnetism and gravity and carry a tank of Mercury you might get something that flies, but not well and by accident. What you say in untrue in the sense that:- 1) Good ideas need backing, and if money is being spent on daft ideas there is that much left to go round. 2) It is a truism that no country has ever voted in a Communist government. The same is true of a Nazi government. Even in Germany only about a third of the population actually voted for Hitler. In Pakistan no democratic potitician talks about being a Fascist or supporting the Taleban. The fact of having Nazis in the intelligence services is a real threat to everyone. No one, either in Iraq or the US actually voted for Saddam Hussein. If you had held a referendum in the US I doubt very much whether SH would have been put into power. Certainly the Iraqis NEVER voted for him. Mr Al Maliki (name means "King" in Arabic) may have many faults, but he is at least a democratic choice. To have the CIA (or the ISI) being a totally unelected body is dangerous for the rest of us. Antigravity and the frequency of anti Relativity postings indicate the views of some of these unelected officials. BTW - Could someone explain to me why antigravity is still heavily classified. It is crap and is known to be crap. If you want to safeguard yourself against Earth Crossing asteroids you need an accurate determination of orbit followed by a "nudge" of mm/ sec. General Relativity is therefore of great importance. Of course the anti Relativists are unconcerned. I recall that when I last posted on this topic the posting got hijacked by the right wing. I don't think they care about "reality". - Ian Parker Ian, I must admit to being totally confused by this thread. Are you stating that the CIA is behind the delusional postings on relativity being a fraud? Why would they bother? Did I miss something? Do you have evidence? The CIA is subject to oversight. Also, I always felt that one reason that the NSA hired boy scouts was to keep an eye on CIA. ;-) The ISI got spanked for their support of the Taliban. I once had a co- worker who was a retired officer in the Indian AF ask me why the US supported Pakistan. My reply was "Would you prefer a Pakistan where the US had no influence?" Who is Pakistan going to turn to? Russia or China? Ask the Afghanis and Tibetans, respectively, how that worked out. Rereading this, one final question. What does any of this have to do with physics? --Mike Jr MI5/CIA (aka DARPA) does whatever makes them happy campers. There is no official public oversight of our intellectual and scientific cartel/ cable. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth Brad, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is tiny compared to the CIA. Both DARPA and the CIA have Congressional oversight. DARPA is run out of the Pentagon (not CIA) and Congress approves/disapproves funding for all projects. I assume, not being a UK national, that Parliament oversees MI5. The Defense Science board reviews and recommends research directions for the Pentagon. I once knew a member and he was a straight arrow. Whatever is going on it's probably not what you think. DARPA's agenda is not controlled by a small cabal but rather has to try and satisfy the many competing demands from its many customers. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA --Mike Jr |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
TRUTH IN THE CIA ZOMBIE WORLD
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... The ISI got spanked for their support of the Taliban. I once had a co- worker who was a retired officer in the Indian AF ask me why the US supported Pakistan. My reply was "Would you prefer a Pakistan where the US had no influence?" Who is Pakistan going to turn to? Russia or China? Ask the Afghanis and Tibetans, respectively, how that worked out. Rereading this, one final question. What does any of this have to do with physics? --Mike Jr MI5/CIA (aka DARPA) does whatever makes them happy campers. There is no official public oversight of our intellectual and scientific cartel/ cable. There is certainly parliamentary oversight of MI5 . Its carried out by the The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) which was established under the terms of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Security Services, which includes MI5 and GCHQ. This committee is made up of senior MP's drawn from the major political parties, as of the start of this year the members were Margaret Beckett MP (Chair) Michael Ancram QC DL MP Alan Beith MP Ben Chapman MP Lord Foulkes of Cumnock George Howarth MP Michael Mates MP Richard Ottaway MP Dari Taylor MP Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TRUTH IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 16th 08 05:49 PM |
Where does Einsteiniana lead the zombie world into? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 20 | July 29th 08 09:00 PM |
WHY EINSTEIN WORLD IS A ZOMBIE WORLD | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | September 25th 07 10:06 AM |
Albert Einstein, the Rational World and the Zombie World | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | October 25th 05 09:48 PM |
Albert Einstein, the Rational World and the Zombie World | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 25th 05 09:48 PM |