Troll control

In article , Pete Lawrence wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:32:56 -0000, Craig Oldfield
wrote:

In article ,
burbled happily...
You know the culprit...

aka Oriel36

How naughty of you to repeat this email address.
aka Oriel36

Surely you are the one to repeat ?

Surely wouldn't be his real addy, after all,
would end up full of spam.

That's a good point Craig. probably isn't
his real address. To be safe though, everyone had better stop using
in case the bots grab it and the
account gets full of spam.

Thanks for pointing this out.


Can that actually happen? Just by posting ' in a
newsgroup, automatic software could grab as
a valid email address and send spam to ?

Wow.

Jim
--
Find me at http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk
"Brace yourself, this might make your eyes water."

Jim wrote:
Can that actually happen? Just by posting
' in a newsgroup, automatic software could
grab as
a valid email address and send spam to ?

Wow.

Jim
However it's a hotmail account so it's full of spam anyway
--
Mike Collins
UK

Mike Collins wrote:
Jim wrote:

Can that actually happen? Just by posting
' in a newsgroup, automatic software could
grab as
a valid email address and send spam to ?

Wow.

Jim

However it's a hotmail account so it's full of spam anyway

He must have an awfull time seperating his spam from his legitimate
emails from all his friends. Err... then again perhaps not, eh?
Anyway, I quite like because he's funny.
Can we keep him? Can we? Pleeeeease?

Tim

Tim Hicks wrote:
snip

He must have an awfull...


Apologies for the spelling. I did get right
though, didn't I?

Tim

I find it so surprising that there are so many angry trolls on usenet.
Perhaps he trolls because he finds concepts such as 'space' and 'time'
a little to obscure for him?

because eveyone else is
doing it ;-)

--
John D. Tanner
http://observatory.open.ac.uk

John Tanner wrote:
I find it so surprising that there are so many angry trolls on
usenet.
Perhaps he trolls because he finds concepts such as 'space' and
'time'
a little to obscure for him?

because eveyone else is
doing it ;-)

--
John D. Tanner
http://observatory.open.ac.uk

I am neither a troll and neither am I angry.

When faced with a bunch of stupid useless ****s who have hijacked
astronomy (even your astronomer royal is just an honorary title) and
build a cartoon universe,waste peoples tax money,pervert children's
education,weaken appreceation of the magnificense of the cosmos because
some freak 100 years ago read H.G. Wells,you deserve to eat the **** of
people like Tonkin and Frey.

Everyone knows what time is,you ****ing freaks can't figure out that
John Harrison when building a chronometer was concerned with equable
pace which reflects the Earth's rotation without any direct reference
for that pace.

How does it feel to have lost your English heritage to a young German
who read too much fiction and knew a gullible bunch of people when he
saw it.I thought the English were good at spotting hoaxes,it seems they
became part of the biggest hoax of all !.

All because of a ****ing clock !!!!!.

You can always recognise a quality reply........ Obviously a well-educated
person..... Somewhere in there is an occasional bout of English.

When a writer cannot avoid swearing - they are best left alone in their
ignorance.

Nathan's Ghost


On 25 Feb 2005 07:44:17 -0800, wrote:


I am neither a troll and neither am I angry.

When faced with a bunch of stupid useless ****s who have hijacked
astronomy (even your astronomer royal is just an honorary title) and
build a cartoon universe,waste peoples tax money,pervert children's
education,weaken appreceation of the magnificense of the cosmos because
some freak 100 years ago read H.G. Wells,you deserve to eat the **** of
people like Tonkin and Frey.

Everyone knows what time is,you ****ing freaks can't figure out that
John Harrison when building a chronometer was concerned with equable
pace which reflects the Earth's rotation without any direct reference
for that pace.

How does it feel to have lost your English heritage to a young German
who read too much fiction and knew a gullible bunch of people when he
saw it.I thought the English were good at spotting hoaxes,it seems they
became part of the biggest hoax of all !.

All because of a ****ing clock !!!!!.

In article .com,
burbled happily...

John Tanner wrote:
I find it so surprising that there are so many angry trolls on
usenet.
Perhaps he trolls because he finds concepts such as 'space' and
'time'
a little to obscure for him?
I am neither a troll and neither am I angry.

A happy elf perhaps? Maybe an intellectual dwarf?

--
Craig Oldfield

Language.
wrote in message
oups.com...

John Tanner wrote:
I find it so surprising that there are so many angry trolls on
usenet.
Perhaps he trolls because he finds concepts such as 'space' and
'time'
a little to obscure for him?

because eveyone else is
doing it ;-)

--
John D. Tanner
http://observatory.open.ac.uk

I am neither a troll and neither am I angry.

When faced with a bunch of stupid useless ****s who have hijacked
astronomy (even your astronomer royal is just an honorary title) and
build a cartoon universe,waste peoples tax money,pervert children's
education,weaken appreceation of the magnificense of the cosmos because
some freak 100 years ago read H.G. Wells,you deserve to eat the **** of
people like Tonkin and Frey.

Everyone knows what time is,you ****ing freaks can't figure out that
John Harrison when building a chronometer was concerned with equable
pace which reflects the Earth's rotation without any direct reference
for that pace.

How does it feel to have lost your English heritage to a young German
who read too much fiction and knew a gullible bunch of people when he
saw it.I thought the English were good at spotting hoaxes,it seems they
became part of the biggest hoax of all !.

All because of a ****ing clock !!!!!.

The good ol English will swear like **** if they are forced to eat a
pile of conceptual ****e whether it is called Newtonian ****e or
relativistic ****e.

You ****ing creeps lost the fight years ago by the same indoctrination
the old commies understood so well insofar as if you wrap conceptual
****e in academic terms it will appear profound to the great mass of
maggoty imitators that know no better.

http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7...itics-pt2.html

I can enjoy Newton from seeing what he was up to,I mean how ****ing
thick do you need to be to see that after going through a whole passage
of intentionally writing the most unadulterated ****e he negates the
whole passage.

"And therefore any relative motion may be changed when the true motion
remains unaltered, and the relative may be preserved when the true
suffers some change. Upon which accounts, true motion does by no means
consist in such relations."

http://members.tripod.com/~gravitee/...tions.htm#time

Profanity,you lot should be kicked up and down the road.