A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lockheed B-12? (was: Trust But Verify ...)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 13th 04, 05:49 PM
Paul A. Suhler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lockheed B-12? (was: Trust But Verify ...)


According to Kelly Johnson's A-12 Log, on 14 Sept 1960 they
started work on a bomber version. This saw light as SP-229,
"RB-12 Proposal" on 15 Dec 1960. I believe that Byrnes &
Hurley's "Blackbird Rising" mentions this, but I'm away from
home and my copy, so I can't check.

In 1965, they revisited the concept as the B-71, but like the
earlier ones, it was never built. I've seen drawings of three
variants with bombs in the chines (like the YF-12's missles),
a rotary bomb dispenser in the fuselage (inside the covers
of Crickmore's books?), and a single large bomb in the fuselage.

But as an earlier writer has posted, the B-12 was never built
in any form.
  #2  
Old July 13th 04, 08:54 PM
OM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 13 Jul 2004 09:49:09 -0700, (Paul A. Suhler)
wrote:

But as an earlier writer has posted, the B-12 was never built
in any form.


....Hey, if you're going to back me up, at least mention me, dammit!
:-) :-) :-)

OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for |
http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr
  #3  
Old July 13th 04, 10:41 PM
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Paul A. Suhler wrote:

In 1965, they revisited the concept as the B-71, but like the
earlier ones, it was never built. I've seen drawings of three
variants with bombs in the chines (like the YF-12's missiles),
a rotary bomb dispenser in the fuselage (inside the covers
of Crickmore's books?),


There are two drawings of that in Miller's "Skunk Works".
The bomb bay appears to be located at between 550 and 634 inchs back
from the nose of the aircraft, giving the bombs an overall length of
around 80 inches, and a diameter of 11 inches (although the drawing
looks like it says 71" for diameter, which makes no sense in regards to
the diameter of the fuselage shown.)

and a single large bomb in the fuselage.


That was supposed to be based on the warhead of the Polaris missile.

Pat

  #4  
Old July 17th 04, 06:58 AM
Scott Ferrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:41:27 -0500, Pat Flannery
wrote:



Paul A. Suhler wrote:

In 1965, they revisited the concept as the B-71, but like the
earlier ones, it was never built. I've seen drawings of three
variants with bombs in the chines (like the YF-12's missiles),
a rotary bomb dispenser in the fuselage (inside the covers
of Crickmore's books?),


There are two drawings of that in Miller's "Skunk Works".
The bomb bay appears to be located at between 550 and 634 inchs back
from the nose of the aircraft, giving the bombs an overall length of
around 80 inches, and a diameter of 11 inches (although the drawing
looks like it says 71" for diameter, which makes no sense in regards to
the diameter of the fuselage shown.)

and a single large bomb in the fuselage.


That was supposed to be based on the warhead of the Polaris missile.

Pat




There was also some drawings of one that would carry four SRAMs in the
chines (two on each side where the AIM-47s went on the YF-12A) and
designed for Mach 3.2 launch.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bechtel Nevada: Control of the World's Largest Nuclear Weapons Facilities * Astronomy Misc 0 May 2nd 04 05:29 PM
Lockheed: In The National Security Interest of America * Astronomy Misc 4 April 15th 04 06:30 AM
Ramping Up The Paranoia: Ping MHVW: VVF nomiation. Was Water: Free Energy * Astronomy Misc 6 April 13th 04 11:50 PM
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 1 October 15th 03 12:21 AM
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 October 14th 03 03:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.