|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
On 5/24/20 8:57 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says... You can only expect a citation to the patent that will be filed some months in the future, nothing else I think. Not terribly encouraging given past experience with people claiming to have invented a reactionless drive. Here is a NASA paper on the subject of reactionless drives that simply don't work, at least some of which were patented. Responding to Mechanical Antigravity Marc G. Millis - Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Nicholas E. Thomas - University of Miami, Miami, Florida https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070004897 I hope that the above will shed some light on wny I'm quite skeptical. Jeff you just don't get the point. there is nothing mechanical, nor moving parts in an electromagnetic reactionless drive. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
On 5/25/20 2:07 PM, Alain Fournier wrote:
On May/24/2020 at 21:47, Doctor Who wrote : On 5/24/20 8:57 PM, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... You can only expect a citation to the patent that will be filed some months in the future, nothing else I think. Not terribly encouraging given past experience with people claiming to have invented a reactionless drive. Here is a NASA paper on the subject of reactionless drives that simply don't work, at least some of which were patented. Responding to Mechanical Antigravity Marc G. Millis - Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Nicholas E. Thomas - University of Miami, Miami, Florida https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070004897 I hope that the above will shed some light on wny I'm quite skeptical. Jeff you just don't get the point. there is nothing mechanical, nor moving parts in an electromagnetic reactionless drive. I believe you that there are no moving parts. On the other hand, if you look at a SpaceX launch, you really see it moving. Alain Fournier no I see it imploding during tests, and NASA's Loverro going away. reactionless drive is not antigravity. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
In article , says...
On 5/24/20 8:57 PM, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... You can only expect a citation to the patent that will be filed some months in the future, nothing else I think. Not terribly encouraging given past experience with people claiming to have invented a reactionless drive. Here is a NASA paper on the subject of reactionless drives that simply don't work, at least some of which were patented. Responding to Mechanical Antigravity Marc G. Millis - Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Nicholas E. Thomas - University of Miami, Miami, Florida https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070004897 I hope that the above will shed some light on wny I'm quite skeptical. Jeff just useless babblering. I post an actual NASA paper on the subject of the patent office being duped on this very subject and you say I'm "babblering"? LOL! Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Or put another way in English, put up or shut up. Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
On 5/25/20 3:50 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says... you just don't get the point. there is nothing mechanical, nor moving parts in an electromagnetic reactionless drive. I must have struck a nerve, because this is the second reply you've made to my one post. Again, this certainly isn't the first time someone has claimed to have invented such a thing. I remain skeptical until such a drive has been demonstrated in orbit. And even then, an electromagnetic device like this might only work due to the earth's magnetic field, so it would also need to demonstrate its operation outside of the influence of the earth's magnetic field. Prove it. Fly it. Jeff Absolutely it will fly, no matter what you say here. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The comic tragedy of rocketry | [email protected] | Policy | 1 | February 3rd 20 03:49 AM |
EINSTEIN'S REVOLUTION: IRONY OR TRAGEDY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 21st 11 08:47 PM |
Response to V Tech tragedy - | Andy and John | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | April 22nd 07 08:44 AM |
AUSTRALIA ON THE VERGE OF A TRAGEDY | Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times | Astronomy Misc | 3 | January 30th 07 07:07 PM |
Action Device Tragedy | Abhi | Astronomy Misc | 24 | January 24th 04 10:14 PM |