A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mine the Monn is like running a legless marathon



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 16th 20, 11:49 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Mine the Monn is like running a legless marathon


We are witnessing an explosion of pieces of paper (called executive orders) in which it is said to go to the Moon, to Mars, to extract minerals from other celestial bodies. There are executive orders and a willingness to go for 50 years, but if you look closely there is no astronautical physical means that can do this. The specific impulse of the rockets is low and the rockets lose pieces and mass to move Yes with cartoons with films it is good to go to the Moon and Mars and people let themselves be influenced by images and robots.
Everything suggests that with Artemis it will be worse than with the Space Shuttle. You will waste time, you will not achieve anything with a high risk of disasters.

www.asps.it
  #2  
Old May 16th 20, 10:44 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Mine the Monn is like running a legless marathon

Il giorno sabato 16 maggio 2020 12:49:27 UTC+2, ha scritto:
We are witnessing an explosion of pieces of paper (called executive orders) in which it is said to go to the Moon, to Mars, to extract minerals from other celestial bodies. There are executive orders and a willingness to go for 50 years, but if you look closely there is no astronautical physical means that can do this. The specific impulse of the rockets is low and the rockets lose pieces and mass to move Yes with cartoons with films it is good to go to the Moon and Mars and people let themselves be influenced by images and robots.
Everything suggests that with Artemis it will be worse than with the Space Shuttle. You will waste time, you will not achieve anything with a high risk of disasters.

www.asps.it


Il giorno sabato 16 maggio 2020 23:30:04 UTC+2, Bob Casanova ha scritto:
On Sat, 16 May 2020 03:51:34 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by :


We are witnessing an explosion of pieces of paper (called executive orders) in which it is said to go to the Moon, to Mars, to extract minerals from other celestial bodies. There are executive orders and a willingness to go for 50 years, but if you look closely there is no astronautical physical means that can do this. The specific impulse of the rockets is low and the rockets lose pieces and mass to move Yes with cartoons with films it is good to go to the Moon and Mars and people let themselves be influenced by images and robots.
Everything suggests that with Artemis it will be worse than with the Space Shuttle. You will waste time, you will not achieve anything with a high risk of disasters.

www.asps.it

I believe Cavorite was mentioned in the latest proposals,
generated using the P-F (Pons-Fleischmann) technique. Or
possibly, if that doesn't work out, a *really big* cannon.


rotfl



Some dude named Ferguson has apparently generated models for
both, using 20-year-old proprietary secret algorithms. Or
maybe it was the other (in)famous "model" guy; someone named
Kleinmann, IIRC.
--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov


at the end of this year Nasa will know what is PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm by F432 Patent
Finally will start the end of rocketry :-)
  #3  
Old May 17th 20, 08:43 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default Mine the Monn is like running a legless marathon

Il giorno sabato 16 maggio 2020 23:44:45 UTC+2, ha scritto:
Il giorno sabato 16 maggio 2020 12:49:27 UTC+2, ha scritto:
We are witnessing an explosion of pieces of paper (called executive orders) in which it is said to go to the Moon, to Mars, to extract minerals from other celestial bodies. There are executive orders and a willingness to go for 50 years, but if you look closely there is no astronautical physical means that can do this. The specific impulse of the rockets is low and the rockets lose pieces and mass to move Yes with cartoons with films it is good to go to the Moon and Mars and people let themselves be influenced by images and robots.
Everything suggests that with Artemis it will be worse than with the Space Shuttle. You will waste time, you will not achieve anything with a high risk of disasters.

www.asps.it


Il giorno sabato 16 maggio 2020 23:30:04 UTC+2, Bob Casanova ha scritto:
On Sat, 16 May 2020 03:51:34 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by :


We are witnessing an explosion of pieces of paper (called executive orders) in which it is said to go to the Moon, to Mars, to extract minerals from other celestial bodies. There are executive orders and a willingness to go for 50 years, but if you look closely there is no astronautical physical means that can do this. The specific impulse of the rockets is low and the rockets lose pieces and mass to move Yes with cartoons with films it is good to go to the Moon and Mars and people let themselves be influenced by images and robots.
Everything suggests that with Artemis it will be worse than with the Space Shuttle. You will waste time, you will not achieve anything with a high risk of disasters.

www.asps.it

I believe Cavorite was mentioned in the latest proposals,
generated using the P-F (Pons-Fleischmann) technique. Or
possibly, if that doesn't work out, a *really big* cannon.


rotfl



Some dude named Ferguson has apparently generated models for
both, using 20-year-old proprietary secret algorithms. Or
maybe it was the other (in)famous "model" guy; someone named
Kleinmann, IIRC.
--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov


at the end of this year Nasa will know what is PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm by F432 Patent
Finally will start the end of rocketry :-)


Il giorno domenica 17 maggio 2020 06:45:02 UTC+2, Bob Casanova ha scritto:
On Sat, 16 May 2020 14:43:10 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by :

Il giorno sabato 16 maggio 2020 23:30:04 UTC+2, Bob Casanova ha scritto:
On Sat, 16 May 2020 03:51:34 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by
:


We are witnessing an explosion of pieces of paper (called executive orders) in which it is said to go to the Moon, to Mars, to extract minerals from other celestial bodies. There are executive orders and a willingness to go for 50 years, but if you look closely there is no astronautical physical means that can do this. The specific impulse of the rockets is low and the rockets lose pieces and mass to move Yes with cartoons with films it is good to go to the Moon and Mars and people let themselves be influenced by images and robots.
Everything suggests that with Artemis it will be worse than with the Space Shuttle. You will waste time, you will not achieve anything with a high risk of disasters.

www.asps.it

I believe Cavorite was mentioned in the latest proposals,
generated using the P-F (Pons-Fleischmann) technique. Or
possibly, if that doesn't work out, a *really big* cannon.


rotfl



Some dude named Ferguson has apparently generated models for
both, using 20-year-old proprietary secret algorithms. Or
maybe it was the other (in)famous "model" guy; someone named
Kleinmann, IIRC.


at the end of this year Nasa will know what is PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion) www.asps.it/pnndatabase.htm by F432 Patent
Finally will start the end of rocketry :-)


Uh-huh. Like fusion (the real sort, not the P-F handwavium),
it's "just around the corner". For the past 5 or 6 decades.

I'll look at "PNN" when a working system is built and
publicly demonstrated.


A public open box event on the operation of the PNN will be held this year after the patent filing of F432 http://www.asps.it/nov122.jpg and there will also be a special ASPS demonstration url.
Whoever has an electrodrodynamic lab will have the strong temptation and the possibility to reproduce it.
As General Patton had the mocking goal of peeing in the Rhine River, so there are those who want to pee it on Mars. :-)

Per aspera ad astra

E.Laureti








--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TELFER MINE, WHO DISCOVERED IT ? [email protected] Astronomy Misc 8 April 14th 08 10:31 PM
Got mine - Lidl scope;-) nytecam UK Astronomy 10 December 16th 05 09:27 AM
Russia to mine the Moon? Pat Flannery History 148 October 8th 05 07:48 PM
Russia to mine the Moon? Pat Flannery Policy 129 October 8th 05 07:48 PM
Russia to mine the Moon? Alex Terrell Policy 0 August 31st 05 11:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.