A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » SETI
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"A QUANTUM BOMB"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 25th 03, 12:18 PM
Roger Wilco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "A QUANTUM BOMB"

"A QUANTUM BOMB"
by: netcrazy
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all dimensions
around us and is a infinite chain reaction every opposing reaction has
an unseen opposite reaction ( refraction )of light. Wave Length -
Gravity -
Light - mass - Wave Lengths.( THEY ARE ALL INTERCHANGEABLE )"

Over the past century, physicists have unlocked the secrets behind
radio and television, nuclear energy and the power of the sun. Now
they're seeking the ultimate prize: a "theory of everything" that
could reveal a bizarre realm of inter dimensional wormholes and time
warps.

SUCH A THEORY would give us the ability to "read the mind of God,"
says Cambridge cosmologist Stephen Hawking. And in Hawking's opinion,
there's a 50-50 chance that someone will discover the Holy Grail of
physics within the next 20 years.

Beginning in the 1920s, a generation of scientists defined the
small scale universe as a collection of fuzzy phantoms. These
subatomic particles couldn't be precisely located in space and time,
but their interaction could be described in statistical terms.The
equations that describe the gravitational field are completely
different from those for electromagnetism and subatomic interactions.

But one bizarre approach is gaining popularity. It turns out that the
equations of quantum theory can mesh perfectly with the theory of
relativity. Now in the 2003 we know the quantum address of all matter
in
our quantum tunnel.

This article is based on material from "Hyper space" and "Visions" by
Michio Kaku. 12-01-03 by tim liverance




He apparently emailed this to Art bell and Art read it on the air to
Kaku
last night and Kaku said it was stupid. "That doesn't make any
sense," he said; when Art pressed him further, Kaku said "It's in
defiance of the laws of physics."

I was actually quite impressed by Kaku on last night's show. When he
sticks to actual physics and the history of same, he seems quite
intelligent. He had some interesting things to say about nuclear
reactor accidents and how they happened.

According to the physicists in
the USA and Austria who have come up with a new, improved
solution to this dastardly challenge of probing without
interacting, the answer is 'yes'. The 'superbomb' conundrum
above was posed in 1993, by physicists A. Elitzur and
L. Vaidman, to illustrate the problem of 'interaction-free'
measurements. It is a restatement of the old quantum-theory
chestnut: the observer and the observed are inextricably
linked. Elitzur and Vaidman proposed that, far from foiling
attempts at interaction-free measurement, quantum theory
makes them possible. Conventional thinking says that, if
you want to inspect the bombs, there's no option but to
bounce at least one photon off them. Yet according to
quantum theory, because light is both wave and particle,
a photon can have a ghostly influence on itself. A beam of
light that is split in two and then recombined by a system
of mirrors will generate interference effects - even if only
one photon passes through the apparatus at a time. Elitzur
and Vaidman showed that, because of this 'self-interference',
a primed superbomb could be detected with a one in two chance
even without the photon actually striking it. This is all
very well as far as it goes - but the option of being blown
up in half of the measurements is none too attractive.
Now Paul Kwiat from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in
New Mexico, and colleagues, have improved the odds from one
in two to almost one in four. As they explain in Physical
Review Letters(1) they have improved on Elitzur and Vaidman's
solution, with the help of another strange quantum-mechanical
effect: the 'quantum Zeno effect'. This trick is named after
Zeno, the Greek philosopher of the fourth century BC renowned
for his relish of paradoxes. His take on the 'measurement
problem' has entered folklore as the adage that 'a watched
pot never boils'. In the quantum world, this can acquire
some truth: in some situations, repeated measurements made
on a quantum system can prevent it from changing its state.
This is the quantum Zeno effect. It operates even if the
interaction between the probe and the system is extremely
weak. The interaction can then be inferred from the
invariance of the system. The effect holds even in the case
of vanishingly small interaction strengths, if the
measurements are made often enough. Now, Kwiat and
colleagues report that, with just six such measurements,
a single photon of laser light could detect a particular
quantum system two times out of three without being
absorbed. By combining Elitzur and Vaidman's beam-splitting
arrangement with an arrangement of polarizing filters to
bring about the quantum Zeno effect, the researchers figured
that they could, in principle, make interaction-free
measurements as reliably as they liked. In practice, the
limited number of repeat measurements in their set-up gave
them a hypothetical probability of interaction-free
detection of 85 per cent. Experimentally, the efficiency
was a little less - about 74 per cent, or three out of
four - because of losses in the light signal within the
apparatus. But the researchers claim that increasing the
number of sequential measurements to 100 would increase
the practical efficiency to more than 93 per cent.
So there is hope yet for the quantum detective.

(1) References Kwiat, P. G., White, A. G., Mitchell,
J. R., Nairz, O., Weihs, G., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A.
High-Efficiency Quantum Interrogation Measurements via
the Quantum Zeno Effect Physical Review Letters 83,
4725 - 4728 1999.| Homepage: http://prl.aps.org/ |

© Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2003

Post a follow-up to this message


Art Bell
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/


Advance Technology

Mark and x advance technology
then bring it back in time to the x give it to the researchers and
then go to the future and do the same
thing and come back and make Tim liverance smarter from birth and find
out what he invented.
the core mind stays the same he would have be interested in the same
things.
they just think killing his brain would stop it this time but again
look above he still loves quantum physics.


advance technology beyond area 51


Build a quantum lab and mark off area X develop future theory
technology give it a project number and pass it on and on so in the
future we can quantum leap
technology back in time. two lab area x. build a quantum reinstatement
area. fiber optic cable on a super computer..

or

find out where i went @ 1-11-2001 or 1-11-2002 @ 11:30 - 12:00
metaphysical

64 bit processor run like 100 million zeta hz

Data encryption 360 degrees rotation document 90 degrees and
encryption
on every angel then change it two binary code and fold it over like a
piece of paper then having the one's and zero cancel each other out.

if you written a very long letter and then change it two binary code
it would look like this

01010101010101010101010
10010101010101010101010
01010101001010101010010
00010101000101010101010
10010101010100101010101
01010101010100001100101
01001010101010101010111
11110111001101010101010
01010101010101010101010
10101010101010101010101

if you took the piece of paper and folded it and folded it and folded
it the 0 and 1 would cancel each out and if you keep folding the piece
of paper too the smallest you would have 4 numbers left
1001 now if the key new the folding times you could send 4 bytes over
the internet and unzip a
100 zetabyte program you computer could store all the programs ever
written but just need the key to unzip then you could us this for SETI
for signals or can you imagine a computer processor that would be 1.8
Hz but run like 100 million zeta hz you could use the new 64 bit
process second side to unzip while the front side processes. or use
this for the matrix or quantum computing or supercomputer. 64 bit.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum of Work Hossein Javadi Astronomy Misc 0 February 21st 04 07:05 AM
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all Roger Wilco Policy 0 December 17th 03 11:38 PM
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all dimensions Roger Wilco Space Station 0 December 16th 03 02:29 AM
A quantum bomb at such a magnitude that it collapse all dimensions Roger Wilco Policy 0 December 16th 03 02:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.