|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
C5 through the window.
I remember reading about using thin Mylar or some other thin =
plastic-like sheeting as an optical window. Wish i could recall the = details. -Florian Stargazing.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
C5 through the window.
Ah, yes. Astro-Physics had an uncoated version of the Astro-Solar Safely
Film. That would be worth a try. "Florian" wrote in message ... I remember reading about using thin Mylar or some other thin plastic-like sheeting as an optical window. Wish i could recall the details. -Florian Stargazing.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
C5 through the window.
In article ,
"Alan French" wrote: Ah, yes. Astro-Physics had an uncoated version of the Astro-Solar Safely Film. That would be worth a try. "Florian" wrote in message ... I remember reading about using thin Mylar or some other thin plastic-like sheeting as an optical window. Wish i could recall the details. -Florian Stargazing.com I'm not following this. Just how would you use such a film? BTW, I've poked a Questar thru plate glass windows on a few occasions, with differing results. I once had a plate window in my office that was really pretty good. My recommendation would be to try different parts of the window by setting the scope in different places in the room. And of course you need to keep the window perpendicular to the scope axis. Starry Skies, Rich |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
C5 through the window.
"Richard DeLuca" wrote in message news In article , "Alan French" wrote: Ah, yes. Astro-Physics had an uncoated version of the Astro-Solar Safely Film. That would be worth a try. I'm not following this. Just how would you use such a film? BTW, I've poked a Questar thru plate glass windows on a few occasions, with differing results. I once had a plate window in my office that was really pretty good. [SNIP] Hi Richard, You replace a window with some of the film, or put a frame in an open portion of a sliding glass door that has the film in it. Astro-Physics had an uncoated version of the material used to make the Baader Astro-Solar Safety Film. I do not see it in their catalog or on their web site, but a friend bought some to use as a cover on his remotely operated telescope. I use my spotting scope some through our sliding glass door. Looking reasonably straight through it, and not using high powers, it works pretty well. Clear skies, Alan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
C5 through the window.
In article ,
"Alan French" wrote: Hi Richard, You replace a window with some of the film, or put a frame in an open portion of a sliding glass door that has the film in it. Astro-Physics had an uncoated version of the material used to make the Baader Astro-Solar Safety Film. I do not see it in their catalog or on their web site, but a friend bought some to use as a cover on his remotely operated telescope. I use my spotting scope some through our sliding glass door. Looking reasonably straight through it, and not using high powers, it works pretty well. Thanks Alan, At first I thought you guys might be talking about putting a sheet on the scope's objective, or on the window glass. As you can see, I've been awake way too long today. If you're up until 5:30am, why go to sleep at all..........8-P I'm not sure that Tracy has the option of doing this (based on my reading of the original question). Rich |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
C5 through the window.
I wonder if insect screening would "improve" the image, that is,
over that seen through common window glass. I often observe the birds in my backyard through a plate glass door. It does work but there is no doubt that it looks a whole lot better without the glass door in the way. Looking through the screen door, that is definitely worse than lookng through the glass. My suggestions (one real, the rest well..) 1. A C5 with a 25mm eyepiece is about 50X. This is a pretty high magnification and will magnify the problems caused by looking through the window. Lower magnifications wil be sharper. If you have a focal reducer for your C5, consider using it. The standard 6.3 reducer will reduce the focal length to about 800mm. Combine that with a 32 mm Plossl and you will have a field of view that is 2 degrees instead of 1 degree and be working at 25X instead of 50X. The image should be sharper and the wider FOV makes finding those birds a lot easier. 2. Take a small hammer and knock a hole in the window. Cover it up at night with some Duct Tape. 3. Move to New Mexico, Arizona or California where the bugs ain't so bad. jon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
C5 through the window.
Jon Isaacs wrote: I wonder if insect screening would "improve" the image, that is, over that seen through common window glass. I often observe the birds in my backyard through a plate glass door. It does work but there is no doubt that it looks a whole lot better without the glass door in the way. Looking through the screen door, that is definitely worse than lookng through the glass. My suggestions (one real, the rest well..) 1. A C5 with a 25mm eyepiece is about 50X. This is a pretty high magnification and will magnify the problems caused by looking through the window. Lower magnifications wil be sharper. If you have a focal reducer for your C5, consider using it. The standard 6.3 reducer will reduce the focal length to about 800mm. Combine that with a 32 mm Plossl and you will have a field of view that is 2 degrees instead of 1 degree and be working at 25X instead of 50X. The image should be sharper and the wider FOV makes finding those birds a lot easier. Hmm, that's a good idea. I may try this. 2. Take a small hammer and knock a hole in the window. Cover it up at night with some Duct Tape. That's a better idea. I'm going to try that right now. I'll let you know how it worked out. 3. Move to New Mexico, Arizona or California where the bugs ain't so bad. jon |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
C5 through the window.
Too FUNNY!
Phil Tracy wrote: Can I get your home phone number? As indicated in my earlier post, I went out and tried option number 2. As soon as I tapped the plate glass window with the small hammer, the entire sheet of glass developed cracks and shattered into a million little tiny pieces. The biggest piece left was the size of a pea. Apperantly, the plate glass window was made of tempered safety glass. Anyway, the whole the hammer left is way bigger than the amount of duct tape that I have left over from my last project. (Fixing the ice maker) My wife heard the window break and came into the room while I was still examining the pieces. Since I hadn't had the chance to hide the hammer, she automatically assumed that I must have broke the window. (I was going to blame it on a bird like the last time.) Anyway, she started screaming about the mess, the mosquitoes, and the humidty so I told her to calm down that I was just trying to improve the focus of the birds. Then she asked what made me think that I could improve the focus by shattering the window with a hammer. That's when I told her it was the idea of some guy named Jon on the internet. Now she wants to know what gave you the idea of improving the focus of the birds with a hammer. (Actually, she was still yelling, but don't worry, she always does that when somebody's idea breaks a window.) So could I get that number now? P.S. Don't try to calm her down by pointing out that the birds ARE in better focus. I already tried to show her that. She HATES it when you prove your right. Jon Isaacs wrote: I wonder if insect screening would "improve" the image, that is, over that seen through common window glass. I often observe the birds in my backyard through a plate glass door. It does work but there is no doubt that it looks a whole lot better without the glass door in the way. Looking through the screen door, that is definitely worse than lookng through the glass. My suggestions (one real, the rest well..) 1. A C5 with a 25mm eyepiece is about 50X. This is a pretty high magnification and will magnify the problems caused by looking through the window. Lower magnifications wil be sharper. If you have a focal reducer for your C5, consider using it. The standard 6.3 reducer will reduce the focal length to about 800mm. Combine that with a 32 mm Plossl and you will have a field of view that is 2 degrees instead of 1 degree and be working at 25X instead of 50X. The image should be sharper and the wider FOV makes finding those birds a lot easier. 2. Take a small hammer and knock a hole in the window. Cover it up at night with some Duct Tape. 3. Move to New Mexico, Arizona or California where the bugs ain't so bad. jon |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Listening to ISS: Window Shutter Open/Close Calls? | JimO | Space Station | 0 | February 13th 04 08:40 PM |
Closing a Window on the Universe | Scott M. Kozel | Policy | 31 | January 19th 04 08:55 AM |
Broken window Fallacy Was: Far Left Group Opposes a Return to the Moon | Axel Walthelm | Policy | 0 | January 15th 04 04:33 PM |
MEDS Created "Window of Vulnerability" Safety Risk | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 9 | September 27th 03 02:08 AM |