A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TMB Monocentrical EP vs. TV Nagler Zoom



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 20th 03, 12:42 AM
Jon Isaacs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB Monocentrical EP vs. TV Nagler Zoom

I wrote:

Thomas:

A suggestion for whatever it is worth.

Stay out of a mudslinging contest with Valery. He likes it and my guess

is
that you don't.

Take the high road and Valery will hang himself.

Best wishes

jon


Valery wrote:

Jon,

If you can easily note, Tom was first, who called my name.
I didn't meant specially his SUPER monos. I just told, that cemented doublet

will be the best for contarst vs ANY another eyepiece (theoretically).


Valery:

For what its worth:

From my point of view, it does not matter who casts the first stone. One can
either take the high road and stand above petty quibbling or one can take jump
right in when one feels slighted.

Parents know that when kids are fighting, their first excuse is, "He started
it."

But we all know that "it takes two to Tango" so it does not really matter who
started it.

So, either of you can take the High Road and everything will be better.

Personally I hope you both do.

You are both people with a great deal of skill and knowledge that add a great
deal to this group, I just hope that you both can spend your valuable energies
on something more constructive.

jon
  #22  
Old July 21st 03, 02:25 AM
lal_truckee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default TMB Monocentrical EP vs. TV Nagler Zoom

Jon Isaacs wrote:



Valery wrote:
CLIP I just told, that cemented doublet

will be the best for contarst vs ANY another eyepiece (theoretically).


Valery:

For what its worth:


Good advice CLIPPED


For what it's worth, I'm a rank beginner in all this - and Valery's
posts have always had fascinating optical truths if one is willing to
attempt understanding. Second, I have nothing but admiration for someone
posting in what I assume must be a third language (after Ukrainian and
Russian) and doing as well as he does. Third - I agree - Valary does
seem to enjoy tweeking noses; particularly when silly claims are made
about apo-like performance in a cheap achro.

I hope Valery keeps posting; I also hope I can afford a Chromacor and a
Safix, and a set of TMB Monocentrics, and a slew of Naglers, and a AP
6in apo for a quicky scope and a 20in R-C for a photo scope; In the
meantime I'll be entertained by knowledgeable people posting, even if
they're caustic.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Zoom to space Damon Hill Policy 4 September 25th 03 07:06 PM
Bad Coatings on my Nagler 16mm T5? Mark Wagner Amateur Astronomy 1 July 15th 03 02:27 AM
Minimal kidney bean effect in 9mm Nagler Type 6? Mark Ledingham Amateur Astronomy 1 July 14th 03 06:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.