A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Residual Strong Nuclear Force vs. Dark Forces?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 24th 13, 11:31 PM posted to sci.astro
Yousuf Khan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,686
Default Residual Strong Nuclear Force vs. Dark Forces?

On 22/04/2013 3:17 PM, Steve Willner wrote:
In article ,
Yousuf Khan writes:
Not saying it's creating a mass, I'm saying it just creates a force


What you are proposing is several layers of "new physics." That
doesn't guarantee your proposal is wrong, but it's far from the first
thing people will be looking at.


Yes, I am probably proposing new physics, or at least new
interpretations of existing physics.

I mean, how was the force-distance relationship arrived at for the
Strong Interaction in the first place? Was it basically just a curve fit
from experimental results? Below 0.7fm it's repulsive, between 0.7 and
2.0fm it's attractive, and above that it's negligible or zero? So it
doesn't really look like we have a truly well-understood force-distance
equation for it, like we do for gravity or electromagnetism, i.e. the
inverse square law.

It would only be a constant, because we call it a "cosmological
constant",


The constant in the Friedman equation really is a constant. Having
it vary with time would be "new physics," but only one layer.

we have no idea if it is truly constant or not.


"No idea" is a little strong. Time variation has been looked for and
isn't ruled out, but existing data show no evidence of variation.


Well, we know that they've found some small hints that it might be
varying over time. Perhaps 13.8 billion years is not yet enough time to
see a really large variation in the "constant".

There is a theory of Dark Energy called Quintessence that proposes Dark
Energy is a varying force.

Quintessence (physics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintessence_(physics)

Yousuf Khan

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Random thought: Dark Matter & Dark Energy vs. Strong & Weak NuclearForces Yousuf Khan Astronomy Misc 17 December 8th 07 09:42 PM
The nuclear forces vs. gravity [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 October 29th 06 04:00 PM
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces yinbing-zhou Astronomy Misc 0 July 27th 06 11:18 AM
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces yinbing-zhou Policy 0 July 27th 06 11:17 AM
PION AND STRONG FORCE UNNECESSARY GRAVITYMECHANIC2 Astronomy Misc 0 January 8th 05 06:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.