A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

another horrible concept of physics-- gravity assist or slingshotChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1502 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 15th 13, 05:23 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default another horrible concept of physics-- gravity assist or slingshotChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1502 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Now physicists of the 20th century learned that the Sun was moving in
Space at 220km/sec, the fastest speed among the planets which Mercury
was moving at 47 km/sec and Earth at 29km/sec and Jupiter at 13 km/
sec.

Now I bet you that if we had a group of astronauts on one side of a
debate and a group of physicists on the other side of the debate and
asked if Newtonian gravity and General Relativity could keep together
the Sun and planets once it is known the Sun moves faster than the
planets. Would we not get the astronauts to be smarter and victorious
over the physicists, because the astronauts would instinctively know,
would have native intelligence that the physicists would not have, and
reason that neither Newtonian gravity and General Relativity could
hold the planets to the Sun when the Sun is moving so fast.

Now we would not expect the astronauts to solve the problem by
proposing that gravity was an electromagnetic force of the magnetic
monopoles contained in all matter and where those monopoles are always
attractive never repulsive and where those monopoles are proportional
to mass. So we still have a inverse square law but we have a force
that is about 10^40 stronger than Newtonian gravity and General
Relativity.

So how would EM gravity solve that speed crisis of the Sun? Simple,
just picture a Solar gravity cell of Space that rotates or spins
around the Sun's axis and stretches out to the Oort Cloud.

Now is that spinning gravity cell what astronauts know as the
Slingshot effect or the Gravity Assist.

So here we have in physics a phenomenon of gravity assist, whereas, it
is really EM-gravity.

When physicists get it wrong and get it wrong badly, they encounter
the true gravity of EM-gravity and they hide it behind a strange non
science terminology-- gravity-assist. When what should call it is the
Solar Gravity Cell or the Jupiter gravity cell which is moving as if
it were a river current and carrying along such spacecrafts as the
Voyager 1 or Voyager 2.



--- quoting Wikipedia on gravity assist (slingshot)---


Explanation
A gravity assist or slingshot maneuver around a planet changes a
spacecraft's velocity relative to the Sun, though the spacecraft's
speed relative to the planet on effectively entering and leaving its
gravitational field, will remain approximately the same. To a first
approximation, from a large distance, the spacecraft appears to have
bounced off the planet. Physicists call this an elastic collision even
though no actual contact occurs. A slingshot maneuver can therefore be
used to change the spaceship's trajectory and speed relative to the
Sun.
--- end quote ---

So, please, physicists, do not litter physics with silly concepts of
gravity assist or slingshot when all you have to do is call gravity
for its real name-- EM-gravity and recognize it has a gravity cell
which like a river current picks up a vessel and moves in the stream
current.

So, astronauts have shown us a proof of the existence of gravity
cells, only they call it a silly and strange name of gravity-assist or
slingshot when it should be called the gravity cell direction of spin.
--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Binary stars prove that Gravity-cells exist Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells#1481 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 April 9th 13 09:23 PM
comparing how General Relativity works versus how EM-gravity worksChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1470 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 April 5th 13 07:03 PM
Titius-Bode Rule becomes a law of physics from Maxwell EquationsChapt16.15 Gravity Cells #1456 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 7 April 4th 13 09:54 AM
Gravity cells to patch up the Sun's 220km/sec Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1446 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 March 31st 13 08:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.