A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

why galaxies, stars, planets are spaced the way they are Chapt16.13Galactic distribution #1500 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 14th 13, 08:18 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,misc.legal
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default why galaxies, stars, planets are spaced the way they are Chapt16.13Galactic distribution #1500 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Chapt16.13 Galactic distribution and shapes when Maxwell Equations are
axioms over all of Physics

Alright, good, I have enough now to continue to pursue the
distribution of galaxies in the Universe. And it is a good thing that
I recently used the Uniformity Principle of geology for the principle
is of much use and value in the mapping of galaxies.

Let me write down some facts first of all.

The Solar System organization is basically Sun and planets on an
ecliptic and the rest of the Solar System as smaller objects of a
spherical Oort Cloud which extends 50,000 AU radius.

Now the atom plutonium from the Schrodinger equation consists of 6
symmetrical lobes centered from a nucleus.

Something pictures like this:

\ | /
/ | \

Only those lines are lobe or highly elliptical shapes
like a sausage shape.

So that the Milky Way Galaxy and our observable universe is one of
those 6 lobes. We cannot see the other 5 lobes nor the nucleus, but
what we can see is enough to allow us to project all else.

Now I have used the tree orchard analogy and it serves well in this
pursuit, except there is one major problem in that we are having a
grove or orchard of trees on a highly curved surface (a sausage shaped
surface) and not a flat plane that we are used to.

So now the Uniformity Principle applies in the logic that what we see
in the Solar System is pretty much what we can expect to see for the
entire cosmos. So that if we see solid body rotation in Saturn's ring
we can expect solid body rotation throughout the cosmos and not have
to dream up absurd goof ball dark matter and dark energy. If we see
that Jupiter is a mini-pulsar of soft X rays with a pulse of 45 minute
periods, then we do not need goof ball neutron stars, black-holes,
quasars, but rather, all we need is a EM-gravity.

So now, applying Uniformity Principle to the distribution of galaxies,
we must start with the Solar System. Can we say the objects are
uniformily distributed like a tree orchard? Well we can because
we have the Sun and planets on a Ecliptic which is a straight line of
Elliptic geometry, and although a straight line in Euclidean geometry
would be more recognizable, here we are in Elliptic geometry.

Now the Solar System tree orchard since it is composed of Sun and
planets for the first 40 AU out to Pluto, and then from 40 AU to
50,000 AU are objects far smaller than Pluto for the most part, that
it is a tree orchard where we have tall trees in one row, the Sun the
tallest, and then we have rows of smaller and tiny plants, like bushes
and finally flower rows. All of this done on a sphere surface, not a
flat plane.

Now, if we project that Solar System model to the Universe at large,
will we get what we see in the night sky? I think so. So let me repeat
the Solar System pattern for nearby stars, and then for stars of
galaxies and finally for galaxies in general.

So that for nearby stars such as seen on this picture

www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/12lys.html

Notice in that picture of the nearby stars that the Sun would form a
cell of itself and each of those stars would form a cell of about
50,000 AU radius so that they would be rather contiguous, where one
cell ends the next star cell begins.

But notice also from that picture that the Sun on both sides has a
"row of stars" where Barnard, Ross, Groombridge are on one side of the
Sun
and we have Lalande, Ross, Wolf on the other side, just as we would
have in our tree orchard a huge elm tree for the Sun and then have
three walnut trees spaced rather evenly apart to one side and three
hickory trees spaced evenly apart on the other side.

Now as we project to galaxy distribution, we expect the Milky Way to
form a row as with the Virgo and Centaurus cluster of galaxies and to
the one side we have all the Shapley cluster and Great Wall and Sloan
Great Wall, much like the same appearance as the nearby stars of the
Solar System.

Now if we got rid of the erroneous Doppler redshift and were using
redshift only as Curvature redshift then the galaxy distribution would
be made even more patterned. It is the Doppler redshift that is
scrambling the true picture of where galaxies are and their density
distribution.




--

This is posted to misc.legal in hopes of finding a lawyer to sue or
shutdown Niuz.biz for using the posts of AP as bait and lure so that
they can attach malware to some innocent person's computer when
opening the post, which Google flags and describes as potentially
harming your computer.
Recently, and ongoing, Niuz.biz (Docendi.org) threatens to harm your
computer if 
opening a post of mine that they have archived. There
should be a law against the practices of Niuz.biz of using posts of
others as bait and lure.
What Docendi.org is doing is establishing malware on innocent victims
and a global filter or block on all of AP's post by threatening to
harm computers and perhaps is the cause of why AP's posts are no
longer author archived in Google starting May 2012.

Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Ads
  #2  
Old April 14th 13, 08:36 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,misc.legal
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default why galaxies, stars, planets are spaced the way they areChapt16.13 Galactic distribution #1500 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Sorry I was typing too fast and forgot to include the http part

http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/12lys.html

I corrected on the original with a sic sign
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
galaxies are spaced like Euclid's tree Orchard Chapt16.14 mathematicsof the force of gravity #1448 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 2 March 31st 13 10:53 PM
chapt20 density and distribution of galaxies #333 Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 January 21st 11 07:37 AM
distribution of galaxies implies a cosmic atom; Chapt.10; #181; 3rded; Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 15th 09 06:44 AM
chapter 10: density & distribution of galaxies; #178 ATOM TOTALITY Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 10th 09 06:56 AM
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 6th 09 09:29 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2019 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.