|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Saturn V fins?
On Apr 9, 3:24 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
Hi behlin, I studied your post. On Apr 8, 2:04 pm, wrote: On Apr 8, 9:38 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote: Ackn owledged this is an old debate, but fresh insight may surface, opinions invited. First let me say I have the highest respect for von Braun and his team, so I think there is a rational reason, but even rocket scientist's ask that question. 1) During the 1st stage boost an F-1 gimbal failurehttp://en.wikipedi a.or g/wiki/F-1_(rocket_engine) The fins would maintain enough stability to give time for the escape tower rockets to be a activated. 2) During 2nd stage separation, when the explosive bolts fire, the 1st stage will have a positively predictable orientation. If a bolt malfunctioned or was delayed, once again the escape tower needs a decision if it is to be activated. I think Braun et al thought alot about a manned rated booster from the start, while the previously Atlas and Titan were nuke throwers. Regards Ken S. Tucker Neither are true Then what is the reason for the fins? #1 The fins would have no effect (velocity was too slow) during the time the vehicle was vulnerable (near the LUT) to engine hard over. Check this post, " Astro/Space Frequently Seen Acronyms" didn't see LUT, but I think I know what you're talking about. Fin effectiveness is proportional to velocity^2, so yes there are a few seconds where they aren't effective, however they rapidly effective. Additionally, the EDS would activate based on attitude rates regardless if the fins were there or not The purpose of the fins is to reduce the attitude excursion rate (in the event of a malfunction thrust vector control), to one that will postpone the disassembly of the rocket, especially where the joints between stages are. #2, the staging occurred at too high of an attitude for the small fins to have any effect on the stability of the first stage And actually, the first stage is aft heavy after separation (unstable configuration), which leads to the next item Fin effectiveness is ~proportional to density*(velocity)^2. at 200k ft, the density is negligible, which is why the stage does not invert. Additionally, no other vehicles require fins for staging I'm certain we've all aware of launches where the Range Officer destructs, do you think the fins buy some time? No, because other vehicles didn't need them. They are just an artifact of MSFC over conservatism. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
every day more, the Ares-1 evolves towards MY design (suggested MONTHS ago) with an underside-LAS and some FINS placed on rocket’s top | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | July 9th 08 12:51 PM |
Images of Saturn (11) - Sixty for Saturn | ukastronomy | UK Astronomy | 0 | March 10th 08 10:17 AM |
Saturn Ib, Saturn V Payload Planner's Guide | scottlowtherATixDOTnetcomDOTcom | History | 13 | April 3rd 07 01:57 AM |
Classic Bonestell Saturn picture with new NASA/JPL Saturn image | astrobob | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 15th 06 05:07 AM |
Tail fins for spaceships? | william mook | Policy | 18 | March 10th 04 02:28 AM |