|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Propellant level remaining at Apollo 11 landing: separating truthfrom myth
Well, might as well get cracking with a tech post now that this NG is
revived... There's a lot of "mythology" about how close Apollo 11 was to propellant depletion at the time of landing. Rather than having between 7-20 seconds of propellant remaining, as some sources have derived, there were actually 45-50 seconds remaining. The following is an excerpt from the Apollo 11 Mission Report (note that I did not bother to clean up OCR errors in the PDF): http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/A11_MissionReport.pdf 9.8.3 Gaging System Performance During the descent orbit insertion maneuver and the early portion of powered descent, the two oxidizer propellant gages were indicating off-scale (greater than the maximum 95-percent indication), as expected. The fuel probes on the other hand were indicating approximately 94.5 percent instead of reading off-scale. The propellant loaded was equivalent to approximately 97.3 and 96.4 percent for oxidizer and fuel, respectively. An initial low fuel reading also had occurred on Apollo i0. As the firing continued, the propellant gages began to indicate consumption correctly. The tank I and tank 2 fuel probe measurements agreed throughout the firing. The tank i and tank 2 oxidizer probe measurements agreed initially, but they began to diverge until the difference was approximately 3 percent midway through the firing. For the remainder of the firing, the difference remained constant. The divergence was probably caused by oxidizer flowing from tank 2 to tank i through the propellant crossover line _- as a result of an offset in vehicle center of gravity. The low level light came on at 102:44:30.4, indicating approximately 116 seconds of total firing time remaining, based on the sensor location. The propellant remaining timeline from the low level light indication to calculated propellant depletion is as follows. (figure not attached, see report) The indicated 45 seconds to propellant depletion compares favorably with the postflight calculated value of 50 seconds to oxidizer tank 2 depletion. The 5-second difference is within the measurement accuracy of the system. The low level signal was triggered by the point sensor in either the oxidizer tank 2 or fuel tank 2. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NEIL ARMSTRONG & NASA - TOGETHER PERPETUATE MOON LANDING MYTH & DECEPTION | Bob Downonit | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 24th 05 08:50 PM |
NEIL ARMSTRONG & NASA - TOGETHER PERPETUATE MOON LANDING MYTH & DECEPTION | Bob Downonit | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 24th 05 08:46 PM |
NEIL ARMSTRONG & NASA - TOGETHER PERPETUATE MOON LANDING MYTH & DECEPTION | Christopher | Policy | 3 | December 24th 05 07:15 PM |
NEIL ARMSTRONG & NASA - TOGETHER PERPETUATE MOON LANDING MYTH & DECEPTION | Christopher | Policy | 0 | December 24th 05 09:33 AM |
Entertainments - was 'Remaining Apollo ......' nonsense | Evening all | UK Astronomy | 0 | July 19th 03 05:00 PM |