MICHAEL GARDNER BEGS FOR MORE PUNISHMENT!!!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
wrote:
Michael Gardner wrote:

Hi frog, min, whatever name you are using today. Even
with your pseudoanonymity, your attitude shows clearly.

It's not him either, Mike.

rl

Let's kick Gardner lowlife out of usenet
Usenet will be a more wholesome place without such fascists looming
around

Let's have him axed from the university
Even US students deserve better than a Gardner

With Gardner netcopping around, US soldiers diing in IRAQ allegedly
for freedom becomes an even more sinister joke.

PUT GARDNER BEHIND BARS AND FREEDOM WILL BE WELL SERVED

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBPxAyMEz45ivkds9xAQF/3Qf/fnhaPlxDbXB1F8jIiejkkr8ksw/3LbJo
gsq6QmtQ6LDcv+fSoPER4DdPrWi/lg+Fy82+wRdYHrATJR7iXl0pwxfg0zYM8WpH
Qy4FDsdXuOjEHK8cJFMzPjvUZyl1uHzzU5CFjpv3PCXAVm4lDz eRqHU+Guc2Nq1N
wn9VzMpCmMVC8glMg5NWDPTPa6jViwAE5jvuatoYVwdlwMJVtz ffTp7sKJurTuYg
Q5hu9/+7eNEhgzQHC7XpFuIR7Il8Abx4xApjLVCwKAXMUtVXpDaQpFm4 3l4bEBzX
llxoPgRI0dp3adbhUAo9XO5BuJgPuAZ7cerdZ3RH8/PPKRjkXOIqgA==
=/gC8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
wrote:
Michael Gardner wrote:

Hi frog, min, whatever name you are using today. Even
with your pseudoanonymity, your attitude shows clearly.

It's not him either, Mike.

rl

Let's kick Gardner lowlife out of usenet
Usenet will be a more wholesome place without such fascists looming
around

Let's have him axed from the university
Even US students deserve better than a Gardner

With Gardner netcopping around, US soldiers diing in IRAQ allegedly
for freedom becomes an even more sinister joke.

PUT GARDNER BEHIND BARS AND FREEDOM WILL BE WELL SERVED

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBPxAyT0z45ivkds9xAQG5Wwf+KHFoHPoSsZTpohY6Fg KDUuzXgyWS4R4o
XjtSYA44k7XUy63EUb82rSAmdkS/R4Vprp9Wd9aQiMyVixIdCJg2kTGdhZhC7NLk
JjYy0eCvf1wFr/Bo/rEK/KzsainS42QLzcoX51koSy/6fBJggzerPFEID+GtZ/qO
+F3rAJt6iW4MpF9jMiLAZmTPC2eQB093CdZPF4u5rv3fgmBb0G IGbp0MwbEwnyXW
bFVHLTdJBoIATkczwW1xVXgT2L6+SsvS/+V5zk6N2Sm++HjrGbMkYwFt8Rxql9Ct
r3AHd8ZozNDJqnbFMBgA1iOI9131DCIPG+x/bigw1byU+Qoo3n+FIw==
=AdFK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
wrote:
Michael Gardner wrote:

Hi frog, min, whatever name you are using today. Even
with your pseudoanonymity, your attitude shows clearly.

It's not him either, Mike.

rl

Let's kick Gardner lowlife out of usenet
Usenet will be a more wholesome place without such fascists looming
around

Let's have him axed from the university
Even US students deserve better than a Gardner

With Gardner netcopping around, US soldiers diing in IRAQ allegedly
for freedom becomes an even more sinister joke.

PUT GARDNER BEHIND BARS AND FREEDOM WILL BE WELL SERVED

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBPxAymEz45ivkds9xAQHkjwf+Ko+4paLG0z99DXwTrp QGL14xUu83XtUU
SM4Yxa++90O18NIU74bDYGu+1Pff0ICxyKq0RsJVXPSIR00N5S g8jPPOf1TcXS37
oSzQ6PXKQVRGY8ZX0qq9jBFdoTgydbw/qhditeglHAGgfivIGin1Kx5Ll9zmlYKn
n5BOwjlXiiQIXg/T8BHfmRe1STjQ0rtE2LwTJii7AGpQlEckYM9wwqmC8AezYam+
+wzKDFap0usdf/bf2R1zo9O4YyUoEdct4mbJSz863wKE5LSM4wDkXkVNgqoc9fDD
TMQs48OBPlP2IQentMHcXZTBbv23Rq40Z00nJhYmTc1JH3SIXD DWLg==
=xjYl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Michael Gardner wrote:

Hi frog, min, whatever name you are using today. Even with your

You brought these troubles on yourself, but neither controlling your
users or yourself. Now you childishly abuse the readers of this
newsgroup. Tell you what - you stop posting my email address in your
headers and I'll stop complaining about your remailer.

I AGREE
Putting your e-mail as a FOOTER to every post/mail emerging from Frog
would be a much more sensible thing to do.
With two lines exposing your netcoping, + flloding of abuse addresses,
+ bullying everybody doesn't want to lick your fascist boot, + abusing
the university's resources for your private wars, + being an idiot.
At home, does your wife cheat on you + beat you up + you have to eat
under the table + you are on the leash? And in public you want to try
to rule the rest of the world, to compensate that miserable private
life?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQBoAwUBPxBWXBcSQgIgXjBxAQEDFgKWOHUKbkdVK5wVAg8fYX 72lsu3D6xANOcm
SRJW9GP+nq5HY76LWaV/bH9/wUqsrRnDF6I1gnoiIl8lfbLtU1Bc+BApc3M5RVgC
mJtJbsq+jzftv34=
=3JGV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Michael Gardner wrote:

Hi frog, min, whatever name you are using today. Even with your

You brought these troubles on yourself, but neither controlling your
users or yourself. Now you childishly abuse the readers of this
newsgroup. Tell you what - you stop posting my email address in your
headers and I'll stop complaining about your remailer.

I AGREE
Putting your e-mail as a FOOTER to every post/mail emerging from Frog
would be a much more sensible thing to do.
With two lines exposing your netcoping, + flloding of abuse addresses,
+ bullying everybody doesn't want to lick your fascist boot, + abusing
the university's resources for your private wars, + being an idiot.
At home, does your wife cheat on you + beat you up + you have to eat
under the table + you are on the leash? And in public you want to try
to rule the rest of the world, to compensate that miserable private
life?

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Michael Gardner wrote:

Hi frog, min, whatever name you are using today. Even with your

You brought these troubles on yourself, but neither controlling your
users or yourself. Now you childishly abuse the readers of this
newsgroup. Tell you what - you stop posting my email address in your
headers and I'll stop complaining about your remailer.

I AGREE
Putting your e-mail as a FOOTER to every post/mail emerging from Frog
would be a much more sensible thing to do.
With two lines exposing your netcoping, + flloding of abuse addresses,
+ bullying everybody doesn't want to lick your fascist boot, + abusing
the university's resources for your private wars, + being an idiot.
At home, does your wife cheat on you + beat you up + you have to eat
under the table + you are on the leash? And in public you want to try
to rule the rest of the world, to compensate that miserable private
life?

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Michael Gardner wrote:

Hi frog, min, whatever name you are using today. Even with your

You brought these troubles on yourself, but neither controlling your
users or yourself. Now you childishly abuse the readers of this
newsgroup. Tell you what - you stop posting my email address in your
headers and I'll stop complaining about your remailer.

I AGREE
Putting your e-mail as a FOOTER to every post/mail emerging from Frog
would be a much more sensible thing to do.
With two lines exposing your netcoping, + flloding of abuse addresses,
+ bullying everybody doesn't want to lick your fascist boot, + abusing
the university's resources for your private wars, + being an idiot.
At home, does your wife cheat on you + beat you up + you have to eat
under the table + you are on the leash? And in public you want to try
to rule the rest of the world, to compensate that miserable private
life?

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003, Michael Gardner wrote:

Hi frog, min, whatever name you are using today. Even with your

You brought these troubles on yourself, but neither controlling your
users or yourself. Now you childishly abuse the readers of this
newsgroup. Tell you what - you stop posting my email address in your
headers and I'll stop complaining about your remailer.

I AGREE
Putting your e-mail as a FOOTER to every post/mail emerging from Frog
would be a much more sensible thing to do.
With two lines exposing your netcoping, + flloding of abuse addresses,
+ bullying everybody doesn't want to lick your fascist boot, + abusing
the university's resources for your private wars, + being an idiot.
At home, does your wife cheat on you + beat you up + you have to eat
under the table + you are on the leash? And in public you want to try
to rule the rest of the world, to compensate that miserable private
life?

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
ews.com...

You're sure abou that, are you? Sure you won't miss the one little tidbit
that might change your life? Sure you're not missign out on something
..phenominal?

In *usenet*?????? From an anonymous poster? Good god, man! Get a
grip.

Either one of these by itself all but rules out anything that could
possibly be important or profound, or even relevant. Together, they
ensure triviality of a degree that was formerly unknown outside of a
college-level sociology class.

The purported purpose of anonymity, especially of anonymous remailers,
on usenet is to provide a platform for free speech by people who would
otherwise not be able to freely express themselves because of possible
persecution resulting from that expression.

It's a nice idea but, while someone somewhere has undoubtedly used
anonymity for such purposes, neither I nor anyone I know has ever seen
nor heard of such a post. Anonymity is virtually confined to those
wishing to impose their egos on the rest of the world from the comfort
and safety of their homes. As for life-changing ideas, I'm far more
likely to see something during a commercial break during a "television
movie event" than I am in one of these groups.

Personal illusions of grandeur aside, the only practical purpose for
usenet is entertainment and socializing. Any real exchange of
information or ideas is purely incidental. If you seek relevance on
the internet, then the most important web site possible can be found
he http://www.1112.net/lastpage.html


---------------
Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of any phenomenon is almost always the most boring."

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

"Scott Hedrick" wrote in
:

wrote in message

snip

Using an anonymous remailer is a clear clue that a poster is a troll.
Honest people don't use them, nor do people who have something worth
listening to.


You're sure abou that, are you? Sure you won't miss the one little tidbit
that might change your life? Sure you're not missign out on something
..phenominal?

I'm sure you are.

Bertie
I'm more likely to miss out on it if I spend the time wading through the
extremely low signal to noise ratio of anonymous posts.