A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Where did the extra mass come from?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 12th 08, 03:33 AM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.geo.earthquakes,sci.archaeology,aus.politics,sci.astro
Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 198
Default Where did the extra mass come from?

On Oct 11, 12:32*pm, oriel36 wrote:

I will say one thing,the Chudinov guy made a global point about the
mid Atlantic ridge whereas those who organise the interior Earth
around a stationary Earth mechanism of 'convection cells' are going to
have an impossible job explaining generation of crust off the entire
length of the ridge.

Ah,who am I kidding,you are like kids playing aound with peer reviewed
articles which is the same as trying to play snooker with a rope.To
your credit,you managed to detach the guys who support 'convection
cells' from the main arguments for plate tectonics where they can now
join you at your ee level,again,that is a good thing for geology in
the long run.

The convection cell guys are trying to make themselves feel better at
your expense while being entirely oblivious to there own premises and
conclusions and while there are genuine geologists who have made
incredible discoveries,their insights will be diminished by
intransigence on the matter of the internal mechanism driving plate
motion.It is like having a Rolls Royce driven by pedal power and that
is the way I see Plate tectonics in relation to those who propose
convection cells are the dynamic for crustal evolution/motion.


Hi Oriel36,
Good to see you back.fully harnessed to break spears with the Gogology
Geeks.
I thought you had deserted the battlefield, completely repelled by the
most disgusting demonstrations of Engineering & Physics laws ignorance
on the part of Yates & his mates .
Equatorial Bulge demonstrating a centrifugal migration of the plastic
masses in the mantle, and this in a very short time indeed since the
last poles shifts
Your comprehension of that Physical reality is a demonstration on its
own that there cannot be any Continental Drift at all since a
sphere :
a) No vectors of any type can exist since there is no straight lines,
at fortiori a
b) If such vectorial analysis was still implemented in no case you
would have a resolving & tangential twist of the point of application.
All points of applications would indeed end in outer space.

There are according to the True Geology two reasons in the observed
facts of faults and deep sea trenches. One is of course the Planetary
Expansion ( with the local case of EE) and secondly the consequences
of Moon Impacts on the Pacific ( Alpine folding ) & other places
indeed on Earth previously seen as Hercynian and Caledonian
Orogenesis

I hope you are keeping well

Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Founder of the True Geology

~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~

True Geology Foundation document :
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/69327

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Warhol Misc 0 January 11th 07 10:02 PM
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs att brian a m stuckless Policy 0 October 16th 05 08:54 AM
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs attache brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 October 15th 05 12:22 PM
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 October 1st 05 08:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.