Talking Nonsense in Einstein's Schizophrenic World

Maximum nonsense (this Bingo is one of the silliest Einsteinians):

Max Tegmark - Events and the Nature of Time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXJBbreLspA

Again nonsense but here Bingo the Einsteiniano admits that spacetime (the absurd consequence of Einstein's false constant-speed-of-light postulate) is incompatible with the Newtonian time of quantum mechanics:

Sean Carroll - Events and the Nature of Time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhSUSvYdyzA&t=160s

Again nonsense but Bingo the Einsteiniano defines gravitational time dilation (an idiocy devised by Einstein in 1911 that is easy to disprove):

Carlo Rovelli - Events and the Nature of Time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RJ4t7Ji55k

In their early education Einsteinians are told various idiocies, repeatedly, until in the end they become indistinguishable from Bingo the Clowno:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX5ajyPr96M
Bingo the Clowno

Here is a clear example of the conversion of normal people into thoughtless Bingos: Initially Joe Wolfe's students are sure that the speed of light cannot be the same for differently moving observers but in the end all of them get the name Bingo the Einsteiniano:

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einstein...eird_logic.htm
Joe Wolfe: "At this stage, many of my students say things like "The invariance of the speed of light among observers is impossible" or "I can't understand it". Well, it's not impossible. It's even more than possible, it is true. This is something that has been extensively measured, and many refinements to the Michelson and Morley experiment, and complementary experiments have confirmed this invariance to very great precision. As to understanding it, there isn't really much to understand. However surprising and weird it may be, it is the case. It's the law in our universe. The fact of the invariance of c doesn't take much understanding."

Pentcho Valev

One of the most idiotic assertions in Einstein's schizophrenic world (only the silliest Einsteinians teach it):

Traveling faster than light implies traveling backward in time.

Lisa Randall: "Travel at faster than the speed of light certainly can have dramatic implications that are difficult to understand, such as time travel.." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-r..._b_979883.html

Matt O'Dowd: "Traveling faster than light and traveling backward in time are the same thing." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUMGc8hEkpc

This is indeed a "monumental shift", a dramatic and irreversible departure from sanity, and here is the relevant hymn sung by the silliest Einsteinians:

Lisa Randall, Michio Kaku, Brian Cox, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Brian Greene: "Now, listen carefully. The faster you move, the heavier you get. Light travels at the same speed no matter how you look at it. No matter how I move relative to you light travels at the same speed. No matter who is doing the measurement and no matter what direction you are moving the speed of light is the same. The speed of light is the same no matter what direction or how fast... As you travel faster time slows down. Everything slows down. Everything slows down. Time slows down when you move. Time passes at a different rate. Clocks run slow. It's a monumental shift in how we see the world. It's a beautiful piece of science. It's a beautifully elegant theory. It's a beautiful piece of science. It's a beautiful piece..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuxFXHircaI

Pentcho Valev

Bingo the Einsteiniano brainwashes his students:

Joe Wolfe: "At this stage, many of my students say things like "The invariance of the speed of light among observers is impossible" or "I can't understand it". Well, it's not impossible. It's even more than possible, it is true. This is something that has been extensively measured, and many refinements to the Michelson and Morley experiment, and complementary experiments have confirmed this invariance to very great precision. As to understanding it, there isn't really much to understand. However surprising and weird it may be, it is the case. It's the law in our universe. The fact of the invariance of c doesn't take much understanding." http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einstein...eird_logic.htm

The Michelson-Morley experiment has NOT confirmed the invariance - Bingo is lying about that - but this is a universal lie in Einstein's schizophrenic world (repeated so many times that it is now an absolute truth).

Are students correct in saying that

"The invariance of the speed of light among observers is impossible"?

Of course they are correct. If a light source regularly emits pulses and if the (initially stationary) observer starts moving towards the source, the pulses start hitting the observer MORE FREQUENTLY. For any sane person (students are still sane when they meet Joe Wolfe for the first time) this means that the speed of the pulses relative to the observer HAS INCREASED:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE
"Doppler effect - when an observer moves towards a stationary source. ...the velocity of the wave relative to the observer is faster than that when it is still."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SC0Q6-xt-Xs
"Doppler effect - when an observer moves away from a stationary source. ...the velocity of the wave relative to the observer is slower than that when it is still."

Pentcho Valev

If Bingo the Einsteiniano is extremely beautiful, he/she is allowed to publish nonsense and lies in Forbes every day:

Ethan Siegel: "Newton's theory predicted, if we want to be literal about it, that starlight would not deflect at all when it passed by the Sun, since light is massless. But if you assigned light a mass based on Einstein's E = mc^2 (or m = E/c^2), you could find that starlight should deflect by 0.87" when it passed by the Sun's extreme outer limit. For a contrast, though, Einstein's theory gave twice that amount: 1.75" of deflection. These were small numbers, but a joint expedition by Arthur Eddington and Andrew Crommelin during the 1919 solar eclipse, were able to measure to the necessary accuracy. The deflection they came up with was 1.61″ ± 0.30″, which agreed (within the errors) with Einstein's predictions, and not with Newton's. Newtonian gravity was busted." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...-finally-fail/

Ethan Siegel: "Galileo had stated, back in the early 1600s, that there's no absolute and constant state of rest; no one observer would have a 'privileged' position. But it was also discovered that the speed of light was constant, no matter who the observer was or how they were moving. These two ideas might seem compatible, but Newton's laws of motion couldn't fit them together. It took a new view of the Universe, and Einstein's relativity, to make it work. [...] Albert A. Michelson constructed a series of ultra-sensitive interferometers set up to exploit exactly this fact. As the interferometer rotated into, perpendicular to, and against the Earth's direction of motion, there should have been shifts in the interference pattern produced by the beams of light as they moved through space. But no shift was ever observed; this experiment returned a null result. This was perhaps the most important null result in the history of physics, since it meant that the speed of light was constant to any and all observers." http://www.forbes.com/sites/startswi...al-relativity/

Beauty and science are in harmony in Einstein's schizophrenic world:

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithab..._k-600x617.jpg

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithab...is-590x443.jpg

Pentcho Valev