sci.astro

Tom McDonald writes:

snip

Figures.

Dave,

You erroneously presuppose that I agree with you.

Incorrect, as indicated by my second sentence, McDonald.

Note: McDonald snipped my second sentence.

You erroneously presuppose that I offered no counter explanation.

Obviously incorrect.

You erroneously read my answer.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

You probably wouldn't have if
you were more facile in the language, which poetry engenders.

You probably would have provided a counter explanation, if you had one.

Dave,

It's clear that you are correct, and I've been wrong all along.
Please accept my apology, and my best wishes for you and yours.

Why thank you, McDonald.