|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"SpaceShipTwo could be single stage to SUBorbit"
On 5/14/2010 7:19 AM, Jeff Findley wrote:
NASP was a research playground which was producing little to no flight hardware, and certainly wasn't producing flying testbeds (i.e. real X-planes testing real engines on real test flights). Killing a research program which was sucking up billions of dollars without producing any actual flown hardware was a prudent move, IMHO. You can't be really sure it didn't produce some form of flight test hardware, though probably fairly small and unmanned in design. The program was then (and still is) largely classified in nature due to the obvious military applications of the technology it would develop: http://www.fas.org/irp/mystery/nasp.htm Pat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"SpaceShipTwo could be single stage to SUBorbit" | Robert Clark | Policy | 126 | May 23rd 10 04:06 AM |
"SpaceShipTwo could be single stage to SUBorbit" | Marvin the Martian | History | 0 | May 15th 10 02:44 AM |
SPH model describing the "single impact throry" for the Moon | Joe Taicoon | Astronomy Misc | 7 | April 26th 09 09:24 PM |
SpaceShipTwo "on time and on budget" | Joe Strout | Policy | 5 | July 24th 06 06:47 AM |