|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
proving current physics is wrong as you know it.
it is really a pity crash for current physics. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 1:33:20 PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
proving current physics is wrong as you know it. it is really a pity crash for current physics. Why do you persist in trolling? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
On 5/21/20 7:35 PM, Dean Markley wrote:
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 1:33:20 PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: proving current physics is wrong as you know it. it is really a pity crash for current physics. Why do you persist in trolling? if you are unable to advance physics, tell me what you do in your life, just follow rules written in books like mules? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 5:45:32 PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
On 5/21/20 7:35 PM, Dean Markley wrote: On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 1:33:20 PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: proving current physics is wrong as you know it. it is really a pity crash for current physics. Why do you persist in trolling? if you are unable to advance physics, tell me what you do in your life, just follow rules written in books like mules? I am a chemist and I work in anticounterfeiting. I do what most sane scientists do, I follow known rules and if things change, I adapt. And things do change, new technologies are a dime a dozen. The difficult part of evaluating them is determining which are feasible (technically, physically and fiscally) and then applying them. There's nothing wrong inherently with new technology. However there are people who make extraordinary claims without presenting proper evidence. I deal with them all the time. They are called "sales representatives" and their main goal is to sell. The vast majority of them are ethical folks making an honest living. But I have encountered ones who are less so. I've even had them get belligerent when I challenge their claims. In the end, if their product does not meet their claims or the endusers requirements, they don't sell and the "product" goes away. You and "calma" seem to fall squarely in that last group. As others have said, it's time to "put up or shut up". |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
what a tragedy for you
On 5/22/20 1:09 PM, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says... On 5/21/20 7:35 PM, Dean Markley wrote: On Thursday, May 21, 2020 at 1:33:20 PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote: proving current physics is wrong as you know it. it is really a pity crash for current physics. Why do you persist in trolling? if you are unable to advance physics, tell me what you do in your life, just follow rules written in books like mules? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Jeff don't expect extraordinary proof in usenet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The comic tragedy of rocketry | [email protected] | Policy | 1 | February 3rd 20 03:49 AM |
EINSTEIN'S REVOLUTION: IRONY OR TRAGEDY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 21st 11 08:47 PM |
Response to V Tech tragedy - | Andy and John | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | April 22nd 07 08:44 AM |
AUSTRALIA ON THE VERGE OF A TRAGEDY | Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times | Astronomy Misc | 3 | January 30th 07 07:07 PM |
Action Device Tragedy | Abhi | Astronomy Misc | 24 | January 24th 04 10:14 PM |