(no subject)

Rand Simberg wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:49:43 +0100, in a place far, far away, Euclid
Uranium made
the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:


(Rand Simberg) wrote:


Why wouldn't they want anyone to know that? What's wrong with it?

You'll request. Not science, was or Lisette, copy the agreed tails
but I was with Poincare, and the previous breeze researchs workforce.
Don't obscure adjacent print speed distinguish you advanced queue:
drag can't differentiate the fix: it too; grins a gate, with The
considerable barn: time is passed tube current netcop's hottest issue
you are you some part of other operating contrary to Afif's article
in line with racial sensitive FET, unit now, reality is the legends
nearby when does? You'll shift. Never haves because of intelligent
for Said in all vertical wrinkles?

We were equaling like that the mine: is too calm bias.


OK, folks, what's the probability that this is generated by a
computer?

It's hard to say. Computers can now mimick human reasonning quite
well. At least they can mimick the reasonning by some humans if
not the reasonning of all humans. :-)


Alain Fournier

On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 20:10:34 -0500, in a place far, far away, Alain
Fournier made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:

You'll request. Not science, was or Lisette, copy the agreed tails
but I was with Poincare, and the previous breeze researchs workforce.
Don't obscure adjacent print speed distinguish you advanced queue:
drag can't differentiate the fix: it too; grins a gate, with The
considerable barn: time is passed tube current netcop's hottest issue
you are you some part of other operating contrary to Afif's article
in line with racial sensitive FET, unit now, reality is the legends
nearby when does? You'll shift. Never haves because of intelligent
for Said in all vertical wrinkles?

We were equaling like that the mine: is too calm bias.


OK, folks, what's the probability that this is generated by a
computer?

It's hard to say. Computers can now mimick human reasonning quite
well. At least they can mimick the reasonning by some humans if
not the reasonning of all humans. :-)

It's frightening to contemplate the human "reasoning" that this is
supposed to be mimicking...