|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
According to this, Sunlight is composed only of the range of the
electromagnetic spectrum from IR to UV, with the majority occurring in the visible spectrum. Sunlight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight#Composition Question, if the Sun generates its photons inside its nuclear core, then all of that light should be in the form of gamma rays. But by the time it reaches the surface of the Sun, it doesn't go much over UV in energy. So what mechanism is in place on the Sun that steps its photon energy down from the gamma ray range to the lower frequencies? I assume that there is also a multiplication effect, to conserve energy balance, where they trade fewer gamma photons for a greater number of lower energy photons? Yousuf Khan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
Yousuf Khan wrote:
According to this, Sunlight is composed only of the range of the electromagnetic spectrum from IR to UV, with the majority occurring in the visible spectrum. Sunlight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight#Composition Question, if the Sun generates its photons inside its nuclear core, then all of that light should be in the form of gamma rays. But by the time it reaches the surface of the Sun, it doesn't go much over UV in energy. So what mechanism is in place on the Sun that steps its photon energy down from the gamma ray range to the lower frequencies? I assume that there is also a multiplication effect, to conserve energy balance, where they trade fewer gamma photons for a greater number of lower energy photons? The original photons from the core are not the ones that comprise the spectrum that we see. Those photons are absorbed and re-emitted over and over again by the material of the Sun, and in so doing, transfer energy to the material that shows up in the form of heat. What we see as the Sun's spectrum is pretty close to that of a black body radiator at 5,200 or so degrees. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
On Oct 27, 4:12*pm, "Greg Neill" wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: According to this, Sunlight is composed only of the range of the electromagnetic spectrum from IR to UV, with the majority occurring in the visible spectrum. Sunlight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight#Composition Question, if the Sun generates its photons inside its nuclear core, then all of that light should be in the form of gamma rays. But by the time it reaches the surface of the Sun, it doesn't go much over UV in energy.. So what mechanism is in place on the Sun that steps its photon energy down from the gamma ray range to the lower frequencies? I assume that there is also a multiplication effect, to conserve energy balance, where they trade fewer gamma photons for a greater number of lower energy photons? The original photons from the core are not the ones that comprise the spectrum that we see. *Those photons are absorbed and re-emitted over and over again by the material of the Sun, and in so doing, transfer energy to the material that shows up in the form of heat. *What we see as the Sun's spectrum is pretty close to that of a black body radiator at 5,200 or so degrees.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Photons take 200,000 years from core to Sun's surface. White light is a mixture of photon wave lengths. We have discussed this over and over TreBert |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
On 27/10/2010 4:12 PM, Greg Neill wrote:
The original photons from the core are not the ones that comprise the spectrum that we see. Those photons are absorbed and re-emitted over and over again by the material of the Sun, and in so doing, transfer energy to the material that shows up in the form of heat. What we see as the Sun's spectrum is pretty close to that of a black body radiator at 5,200 or so degrees. Yes, I understood that they aren't the original photons of the fusion process. However, in my mind, a gamma ray that is absorbed and re-emitted should be re-emitted in the form of a gamma ray again, i.e. it should stay the same frequency. Something must be absorbing it, and then only partially re-emitting it at a lower energy level. For example, if an electron absorbs a gamma ray, it gets boosted to a higher orbital. If that electron then drops back down partially, it'll emit a photon of a lower energy and frequency, and then perhaps later it'll drop down some more, and emit another lower energy photon. Is that what's happening? Yousuf Khan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
Dear Yousuf Khan:
On Oct 27, 3:14*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: On 27/10/2010 4:12 PM, Greg Neill wrote: The original photons from the core are not the ones that comprise the spectrum that we see. *Those photons are absorbed and re-emitted over and over again by the material of the Sun, and in so doing, transfer energy to the material that shows up in the form of heat. *What we see as the Sun's spectrum is pretty close to that of a black body radiator at 5,200 or so degrees. Yes, I understood that they aren't the original photons of the fusion process. However, in my mind, a gamma ray that is absorbed and re-emitted should be re-emitted in the form of a gamma ray again, i.e. it should stay the same frequency. No way. If for no other reason, conservation of momentum for the "photon plus charge" before has to be equal to the momentum of the "photon plus charge" after. The electron or nucleon will be *booking*, and the resulting gamma photon will be net less energetic and scattered most likely in another direction. Something must be absorbing it, and then only partially re-emitting it at a lower energy level. Correct for *all* cases. For example, if an electron absorbs a gamma ray, it gets boosted to a higher orbital. Gammas completely remove an electron, or if energetic enough, a nucleon from the system. If that electron then drops back down partially, it'll emit a photon of a lower energy and frequency, and then perhaps later it'll drop down some more, and emit another lower energy photon. Is that what's happening? For x-rays or less energetic, yes. But in all cases involving "hosts", entropy must be increased. Now to your original question, "sunlight" is filtered by the atmosphere, and UV-C and more energetic radiation is completely blocked by nitrogen, oxygen, and ozone pitches in as well (but most important for absorbing in UV-B). Lest ye think the Sun does not emit X-rays and such... http://www.asr.ucar.edu/2004/HAO/tiso.html .... it does. Just not much. David A. Smith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
In sci.physics Yousuf Khan wrote:
According to this, Sunlight is composed only of the range of the electromagnetic spectrum from IR to UV, with the majority occurring in the visible spectrum. Sunlight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight#Composition Question, if the Sun generates its photons inside its nuclear core, then all of that light should be in the form of gamma rays. But by the time it reaches the surface of the Sun, it doesn't go much over UV in energy. So what mechanism is in place on the Sun that steps its photon energy down from the gamma ray range to the lower frequencies? I assume that there is also a multiplication effect, to conserve energy balance, where they trade fewer gamma photons for a greater number of lower energy photons? Yousuf Khan The Sun emits energy from low radio frequencies to gamma rays with most of the energy centered at about 500 nm, not just between IR and UV. http://www.eoearth.org/article/Solar_radiation Is your question why is most of the energy in the visible region? -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Yes, I understood that they aren't the original photons of the fusion process. However, in my mind, a gamma ray that is absorbed and re-emitted should be re-emitted in the form of a gamma ray again, i.e. it should stay the same frequency. Something must be absorbing it, and then only partially re-emitting it at a lower energy level. For example, if an electron absorbs a gamma ray, it gets boosted to a higher orbital. If that electron then drops back down partially, it'll emit a photon of a lower energy and frequency, and then perhaps later it'll drop down some more, and emit another lower energy photon. Is that what's happening? The atoms and electrons are interacting with each other, too. Collisions. These collisions redistribute energy. Excited atom emits photon, ends up in ground state. Re-excited by collision with other atom, no absorption of photon required. Absorb a photon, leading to being in an excited state, transfer that energy, or some of it, to another atom, by collision rather than radiative emission. Also lots of the absorption/emission involves bound-free, free-bound, or free-free processes. At a sufficient depth, the collisions are frequent enough so that the gas and the radiation are all in thermal equilibrium, so the spectrum is blackbody, and the energy distribution of atomic states is Boltzmann, speeds Maxwellian. The opacity is such that radiation can't travel far before being absorbed, re-emitted, etc., with collisional redistribution of energy in there too. So what you see is close to a blackbody spectrum of the highest layer in the sun that is in thermal equilibrium. Above that, the density drops quickly, collision rates drops, and the radiation field is no longer in thermal equilibrium with the gas. If collisions are still frequent enough, you still have Boltzmann distribution of atomic energy states etc (which is LTE, Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium). Higher still, collisions are frequent enough, and you don't even have LTE, and temperature isn't well-defined (doesn't stop people from saying things like "the temperature of the corona is XXXX"). -- Timo |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
On 10/27/10 5:14 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote:
However, in my mind, a gamma ray that is absorbed and re-emitted should be re-emitted in the form of a gamma ray again. Unless it gives up a bit of kinetic energy to the atom. Where did you think that core temperature came from? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
Yousuf Khan wrote:
On 27/10/2010 4:12 PM, Greg Neill wrote: The original photons from the core are not the ones that comprise the spectrum that we see. Those photons are absorbed and re-emitted over and over again by the material of the Sun, and in so doing, transfer energy to the material that shows up in the form of heat. What we see as the Sun's spectrum is pretty close to that of a black body radiator at 5,200 or so degrees. Yes, I understood that they aren't the original photons of the fusion process. However, in my mind, a gamma ray that is absorbed and re-emitted should be re-emitted in the form of a gamma ray again, i.e. it should stay the same frequency. Something must be absorbing it, and then only partially re-emitting it at a lower energy level. Think of it this way: As the energy of the photons slowly makes its way out, at each radius the area of the sphere inside the sun is larger, but the total flux is the same. Hence, to conserve flux, the average energy of the photons emitted and reabsorbed must be lower as you move outwards. The gamma rays are absorbed thermally (they boost the speed of the particles, etc), so the re-emitted photons are unrelated to the ones absorbed (except they have the same energy, minus epsilon). They are not the same photons. If they were, you would have scattering, not absorption. For example, if an electron absorbs a gamma ray, it gets boosted to a higher orbital. If that electron then drops back down partially, it'll emit a photon of a lower energy and frequency, and then perhaps later it'll drop down some more, and emit another lower energy photon. Is that what's happening? No, because in the central regions you have full ionization, even for heavy elements, and certainly for hydrogen, the main source of opacity. Hence there are no bound quantum states in the hot plasma, only continuum. Near the surface that is no longer true and it gets interesting. Yousuf Khan -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Solar EM spectrum, why only upto UV?
Yousuf Khan ) writes:
According to this, Sunlight is composed only of the range of the electromagnetic spectrum from IR to UV, with the majority occurring in the visible spectrum. Sunlight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight#Composition Question, if the Sun generates its photons inside its nuclear core, then all of that light should be in the form of gamma rays. But by the time it reaches the surface of the Sun, it doesn't go much over UV in energy. So what mechanism is in place on the Sun that steps its photon energy down from the gamma ray range to the lower frequencies? You've had a number of good answers. A slightly different way to look at it is to remember that to a gamma ray, pretty much every electron is a free electron (since gamma energies are so much higher than light-atom binding energies). So a gamma making its way though the sun will undergo a lot of Compton scattering, almost all of it reducing the photon energy. --John Park |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calibrated Solar Spectrum | Ioannis | Astronomy Misc | 25 | February 2nd 09 07:20 AM |
Calibrated Solar Spectrum | Ioannis | Amateur Astronomy | 25 | February 2nd 09 07:20 AM |
pic - SN 2005cf spectrum | nytecam | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 15th 05 10:46 PM |
Object in Leo - spectrum please? | John Moore | UK Astronomy | 13 | March 21st 05 09:39 PM |
Up and down the spectrum | Jeff Root | Astronomy Misc | 15 | October 21st 03 07:24 PM |