WILL THE ATV DELIVER?

Sounds like a progress. Havent they been around for many years? Why not test it
in the US? We should have a big enough chamber.

Oh well this is how so many spacecraft fail inadquate testing to save money

Lets hope a failure if it occurs doesnt take out the station.

From: (Hallerb)

Lets hope a failure if it occurs doesnt take out the station.

My god, you are such an maddening, one-track-mind idiot.

Do you pray for failures every day?

Do you ever think of anything else?

DF

On 17 Jul 2003 13:36:36 GMT, ojunk (Dave Fowler) wrote:

From: (Hallerb)

Lets hope a failure if it occurs doesnt take out the station.

My god, you are such an maddening, one-track-mind idiot.

Do you pray for failures every day?

Do you ever think of anything else?

Oh, this way, in the unlikely event anything bad did happen,
he'll be able to claim that he had warned us all about it in
advance.

Dale

My god, you are such an maddening, one-track-mind idiot.

Do you pray for failures every day?

Do you ever think of anything else?

Well after hubbles mirror, various mars probes and a variety of space failures
most of which can be traced back to inadquate testing I would think all up
testing would be mandatory when something is working in close quarters with the
ISS, since ts irreplaceable.

Positive thinking is fine but relying on it rather than testing is foolhardy.

Sadly many posters here are so go nasa they lack the ability to see what can go
wrong, even after it bites them.

Geez even Columbia loss can at least be partially blamed on ZERO testing of the
RCC panels.

I can imagine oh they are fine and sturdy as the tiles, dont worry about it!

YOU THINK THIS IS THE WAY SPACE SHOULD BE DONE?

ojunk (Dave Fowler) writes:
From: (Hallerb)
Lets hope a failure if it occurs doesnt take out the station.

My god, you are such an maddening, one-track-mind idiot.

That sums it up rather nicely.

Jeff
--
Remove "no" and "spam" from email address to reply.
If it says "This is not spam!", it's surely a lie.