|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.
"Henry Wilson DSc" ..@.. wrote in message ... | On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:37:40 -0000, "Androcles" | wrote: | | | "Henry Wilson DSc" ..@.. wrote in message | .. . | | On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:36:04 -0000, "Androcles" | | wrote: | | | | | | ....just as light moves at 1 lightwilson/wilson | | | | Ashes move at 10,000 miles per test match. | | | | Why don't you join Dad's balmy army? | | | I'm not a fanatic. Actually I don't give a flying **** about cricket, | but I know you do, so I tease you. If you asked me the name of an | English player I wouldn't be able to tell you without looking one up | on the internet. | I haven't looked at cricket since my schooldays and even then I | couldn't see the point of it. It is only this winter that I learnt the | ashes were the burnt bails of some long forgotten game that was | once played between England and Oz. Ball games never hold my | interest, not even snooker. I gave up golf when I birdied a par three | on the same course that I saw someone behind me get a hole-in-one | and he asked me to sign his card, the poor bugger was playing alone | and needed a witness. Not much else you can do with it except find | a bar and have a celebratory drink. Most times I have a | commiserative drink instead. What's the point in your team | winning if you are not part of the team? The spectators scream | "We won!" and all they did was drink beer, clap and shout. | The losing spectators hold an inquest and decide the referee was | blind or the team captain should be replaced, you have to find | blame if the team loses and accolades if the team wins. | Being a winner by association is no different to being a criminal by | association. | | The trend is to be a supporter of either a football team or a religion. | | The only difference is that football supporters use knives and broken bottles | rather than bombs and bullets. | Yeah... as I said, I don't see the point. By all means encourage youngsters to play games, that's no different to teaching kittens the skills needed to hunt when they become adult. Games are for sharpening your skills and for kids. Danged if I'd pay to watch a game more than once, though. I did go to see the Pittsburgh Pirates play baseball out of curiousity. I never bothered again, I was thoroughly bored. I watched a game of cricket on the village green, but that was local lads and a pleasant way to spend a Sunday afternoon with a pint, not part of a crowd of supporters, and it didn't matter which side won. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:24:31 -0000, "Androcles"
wrote: "Henry Wilson DSc" ..@.. wrote in message .. . | On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:37:40 -0000, "Androcles" | wrote: | | | | Why don't you join Dad's balmy army? | | | I'm not a fanatic. Actually I don't give a flying **** about cricket, | but I know you do, so I tease you. If you asked me the name of an | English player I wouldn't be able to tell you without looking one up | on the internet. | I haven't looked at cricket since my schooldays and even then I | couldn't see the point of it. It is only this winter that I learnt the | ashes were the burnt bails of some long forgotten game that was | once played between England and Oz. Ball games never hold my | interest, not even snooker. I gave up golf when I birdied a par three | on the same course that I saw someone behind me get a hole-in-one | and he asked me to sign his card, the poor bugger was playing alone | and needed a witness. Not much else you can do with it except find | a bar and have a celebratory drink. Most times I have a | commiserative drink instead. What's the point in your team | winning if you are not part of the team? The spectators scream | "We won!" and all they did was drink beer, clap and shout. | The losing spectators hold an inquest and decide the referee was | blind or the team captain should be replaced, you have to find | blame if the team loses and accolades if the team wins. | Being a winner by association is no different to being a criminal by | association. | | The trend is to be a supporter of either a football team or a religion. | | The only difference is that football supporters use knives and broken bottles | rather than bombs and bullets. | Yeah... as I said, I don't see the point. By all means encourage youngsters to play games, that's no different to teaching kittens the skills needed to hunt when they become adult. Games are for sharpening your skills and for kids. Danged if I'd pay to watch a game more than once, though. I did go to see the Pittsburgh Pirates play baseball out of curiousity. I never bothered again, I was thoroughly bored. It's the most boring game ever invented...next to soccer.. I watched a game of cricket on the village green, but that was local lads and a pleasant way to spend a Sunday afternoon with a pint, not part of a crowd of supporters, and it didn't matter which side won. Cricket is OK. I was fanatical when I was a kid but couldn't afford coaching so took up girls instead...but they cost me a lot more in the long run.. Sport is now designed solely to promote TV ads. One's value to society is based on one's ability to make the TV barons even richer. Henry Wilson... |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Orbital acceleration and tides
This stuff is fascinating -
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&...ge&q&f=fa lse The empiricists working with the Earth's dynamics had great difficulty with the causes of the variability in the natural noon cycles but at least they could correlate that variability with the annual components in tides in terms of orbital acceleration and retardation and credit where it is due,they were zooming in on issues which are all the more important today.When Newton's strain of empiricism dumped the Earth's dynamics into right ascension,these interpretative deductions went and remain in a deep freeze. It is now known from historical records that the lunar nodal cycle introduces temperature fluctuations (insofar as fish are extremely sensitive to these fluctuations which in turn affect their migratory patterns) and with the solar cycle introducing an additional component,it is time to get serious about El Nino and La Nina is dynamical terms.The necessary introduction of orbital longitude meridians reflecting the orbital characteristic of the Earth which turns 360 degrees to the central Sun and coincident with the orbital period of the Earth is the first order of business. These orbital meridians are determined by the distance from the polar rotational coordinates (North/South poles) to the orbital axis located on the Arctic/Antarctic circles as it stretches through the center of the planet.At the precise moment of the December solstice where the circle of illumination is always orthogonal to the Sun-Earth line,the South pole is at orbital noon while the North pole is at orbital midnight.By the March Equinox,the polar coordinates will turn through the circle of illumination reflecting the orbital daylight/darkness cycle as one polar coordinates enters the circle of illumination and the opposite coordinate exits the circle of illumination and into 6 months of daylight. All these people who make a big fuss over models and here is one huge challenge to use daily and orbital dynamics in conjunction with the lunar cycle to get a better handle on things. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Orbital acceleration and tides
On Jan 17, 2:18*pm, Kelleher scribbled:
By the March Equinox,the polar coordinates will turn through the circle of illumination reflecting the orbital daylight/darkness cycle as one polar coordinates enters the circle of illumination and the opposite coordinate exits the circle of illumination and into 6 months of daylight. Your grammatical software badly needs updating. Most of your virtual sentences are now running to half a dozen lines of complete nonsense. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Orbital acceleration and tides
The planet Earth experiences a single orbital daylight/darkness cycle
coincident with its orbital period,as the cycle is characterized by 6 months of daylight followed by 6 months of darkness at the polar coordinates where that cycle is experienced almost in isolation,it requires a slow and uneven turning of the Earth to the central Sun to account for what is essentially a cycle just as the daily daylight/ darkness cycle requires a dynamic to explain it. I can't say whether it is frustration or irritation but the remarkable inability to accept that this orbital daylight/darkness cycle and its orbital cause is already isolated through observations of Uranus - http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...99/11/video/b/ http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infr..._2001_2005.jpg Here is a planet which has two separate motions to the Sun at almost 90 degrees to each other with the polar coordinates spending roughly 42 years in daylight and then 42 years in darkness and nobody wishes to apply the same interpretative dynamical composite to the Earth with specific attention to the motion of the polar coordinates in a complete orbital circuit as the planet moves along its orbital circumference. How,for goodness sake,can an entire group of people calling themselves scientists ignore the orbital/polar daylight/darkness cycle and its orbital cause as this is crucial for explaining what the 17th century guys couldn't do in noticing that the annual components to the tides were affected by either orbital acceleration and retardation as it applies to experimental analogies. The institution of orbital longitude meridians reflecting the turning of the planet from an axis stretching through the center of the Earth from Arctic to Antarctic circles while maintaining the roughly 1600 mile distance from the orbital axis to the polar coordinate as it turns like the hand of a clock and passes in an out of the circle of illumination and acting like a beacon for the single orbital cycle experience by all locations on Earth.This is what causes the seasons and natural noon cycles to vary and that it has been front and center for many years is an injustice like no other. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Orbital acceleration and tides
On Jan 17, 6:33*pm, orifice muttered:
snip crap Your posting habits are getting worse! Your corrupted software is telling you that a sentence requires an entire paragraph. Update your grammar shell or be condemned as barely literate as well as a raving imbecile. We know (from long experience) that you don't mind being considered immoral, completely mad and quite impossible to teach new tricks. But illiterate? Can you possibly live with this lasting shame? |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Orbital acceleration and tides
The orbital longitude considerations are a cinch by applying to
observations of Uranus and specifically the equatorial ring - http://astro.berkeley.edu/~imke/Infr..._2001_2005.jpg The structure of the equatorial ring follows the intrinsic rotation of the planet which,like the Earth,has a maximum equatorial speed reducing to nothing at the polar coordinates.The motion of the equatorial ring with respect to the central Sun is actual and acts much the same as an imaginary orbital meridian would on Earth. It is that combination of daily rotational and orbital components sometimes crossing each other and sometimes promoting each other that has the highest probability of explaining the tides,definitely the seasons and certainly the variations in the natural noon cycle.It is here where the 17th century guys came close but unfortunately they did not have the observational power of today to see the actual orbital dynamic and the fortuitous attributes of Uranus who permit a clear and decisive correspondence between the orbital daylight/darkness cycle and its cause. http://books.google.com/books?id=RyB...ge&q&f=fa lse I am not an empiricist and don't particularly have a stake in pushing experimental analogies too far as they apply to terrestrial effects as a consequence of dynamical inputs but surely there has to be some empiricists among you with the courage to deal with observations that are visible with tangible effects as opposed to this cowardice where all the concepts are super-fast,super small,super-distant,super-old or any other excuse to push concepts which are up front and center. How is it possible not to interpret the images of Uranus in context of orbital dynamics otherwise there is no point calling yourselves physicists.Maybe too dull to consider why the outer planets have rings while they are absent from the smaller and inner planets or dozens of other questions these images bring up. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Orbital acceleration and tides
On Jan 17, 7:44*pm, orifice mumbled:
I am not an empiricist and don't particularly have a stake in pushing experimental analogies too far as they apply to terrestrial effects as a consequence of dynamical inputs but surely there has to be some empiricists among you with the courage to deal with observations that are visible with tangible effects as opposed to this cowardice where all the concepts are super-fast,super small,super-distant,super-old or any other excuse to push concepts which are up front and center. 7 whole lines (of complete nonsense) and counting.... |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Jan 7, 6:32*am, "Androcles"
wrote: http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html Albert Einstein (1879-1955). *Relativity: The Special and General Theory. 1920. *"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" -- Einstein http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg Notice the cup is pointing tangentially. Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially. An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force which acts in a tangential direction. NEWTON'S FIRST LAW. Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed thereon. The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial. Proven by experiment! Proven by peer review! Androcles: As you probably realize, a body on a rotating disk (say, a modified record player) must be restrained in the RADIAL direction—by friction or other means—to remain on a circular path. Once the means of retention is cut, the body will retain its TANGENTIAL, straight- line velocity, and cease traveling in a circular path. Graphical analysis may show that as the loosed body travels tangentially its coordinates may no longer remain on the original radial line. Anyone with more time than I have, should check this out to see. That said, there is nothing in the quoted excerpts of Einstein that conclusively shows he misunderstood the meaning of "radial". — NoEinstein — |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Jan 14, 11:52*pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:22:42 -0800 (PST), Darwin123 wrote: On Jan 9, 12:31*pm, Jerry wrote: Have you ever seen a centrifugal clutch like the ones used in motor bikes or chainsaws? Above a certain rotation speed, a couple of rotating masses exert a radial force on the drum in order to create enough friction to drive the thing. IT IS A REAL RADIAL FORCE. You just said "the rotating masses exert a force on the drum." However, there is no outward force on the masses (i.e., brake shoe). All the forces on these masses are inwards. there is no outward force on the break shoe. The drum exerts an inward force on the masses. The springs exert an inward force on the break shoe. The brake shoe is being pushed inward, not outward. There is an outward force of the brake shoe on a section of drum. However, the rest of the drum exerts an elastic force on this section of drum that keeps this section in circular motion. The entire drum is subject to a force by the hub keeping it in place. Every real force is paired. The total force on the drum is zero. The sum of the forces is zero. There is no "radial force" on the drum that is caused by spinning alone. If the drum and springs disappeared, the brake shoe would travel in a straight line. There would be no radial force on the brake shoe if the drum and springs disappeared. If the centrifugal force were real, then the brake shoe would travel in a curved path when the drum and brake shoe disappeared. In absolute space as described by Newton, every force is associated with two bodies. The brake shoe is a body, the drum is a body, the springs are bodies. The centrifugal force on a body is associated with that body alone. Therefore, the centrifugal force on a body does not exist in absolute space as described by Newton. The centrifugal force doesn't exist in absolute space, as described by Newton. I think that Androcles understands this, though what he says seems muddled even on this point. Your association between centrifugal force and relativists simply shows (shoes?) that you don't understand Newtonian physics. What you think of as "Einsteinian" is really "Newtonian." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ignorant lying Roberts should STUDY relativity. | Androcles[_22_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | October 23rd 09 08:18 PM |
Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1 | qbit | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 9th 07 04:04 PM |
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN OF OUR GENERATION IS LYING AGAIN | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 21 | May 30th 07 08:51 AM |
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT | 46erjoe | Misc | 964 | March 10th 07 06:10 AM |
elsewhere brian a m stuckless wrote: alt.local.village.idiot,alt.mo-rons,sci.physics.relativity | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | October 15th 05 04:26 PM |