Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.

http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html

Albert Einstein (1879-1955). Relativity: The Special and General Theory.
1920.

"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
Einstein

http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg
Notice the cup is pointing tangentially.
Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force
which acts in a tangential direction.

NEWTON'S FIRST LAW.
Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right
line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed
thereon.

The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial.
Proven by experiment!
Proven by peer review!

On 7 ene, 08:32, "Androcles"
wrote:
http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html

Albert Einstein (1879-1955). *Relativity: The Special and General Theory.
1920.

*"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
Einstein

http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg
Notice the cup is pointing tangentially.
Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force
which acts in a tangential direction.

NEWTON'S FIRST LAW.
Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right
line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed
thereon.

The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial.
Proven by experiment!
Proven by peer review!

Once more, drunken Andro has done it!!

Put your heavy and dirt ass on a free wheel cart on a carousel
platform (those with wooden horses that you so much like) and later
inform us if your ass moves tangentially or radially, with respect to
the carousel center.

Big moron!!!

On Jan 7, 6:08*am, " wrote:
On 7 ene, 08:32, "Androcles"
wrote:





http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html

Albert Einstein (1879-1955). *Relativity: The Special and General Theory.
1920.

*"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
Einstein

http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg
Notice the cup is pointing tangentially.
Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force
which acts in a tangential direction.

NEWTON'S FIRST LAW.
Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right
line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed
thereon.

The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial.
Proven by experiment!
Proven by peer review!

Once more, drunken Andro has done it!!

Put your heavy and dirt ass on a free wheel cart on a carousel
platform (those with wooden horses that you so much like) and later
inform us if your ass moves tangentially or radially, with respect to
the carousel center.

Big moron!!!-

Einstein is no match for the Global Brain, thus he is ridiculed today.

In sci.math wrote:
On 7 ene, 08:32, "Androcles" wrote:
....
Once more, drunken Andro has done it!!
Put your heavy and dirt ass on a free wheel cart on a carousel
platform (those with wooden horses that you so much like) and later
inform us if your ass moves tangentially or radially, with respect to
the carousel center.

Are we gunna have to re-invent orbital mechanics to make Warty happy?

--
"Androcles" , 30 Dec 2010 10:53 UTC:
Einstein's calculation is tau = t * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2),
ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img61.gif
2.2usec * sqrt(1-0.999^2) = 0.098362 usec
and NOT the measured 64 usec.
You have got t and tau around the wrong way.
-- Peter Webb, 31 Dec 2010
[And later:]
The only error is Einstein's, you snipping ignorant ****.
-- "Androcles" , 07 Jan 2011 04:20 UTC

On Jan 7, 5:32*am, "Androcles"
wrote:
http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html

Albert Einstein (1879-1955). *Relativity: The Special and General Theory.
1920.

*"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
Einstein

http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg
Notice the cup is pointing tangentially.
Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force
which acts in a tangential direction.

NEWTON'S FIRST LAW.
Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right
line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed
thereon.

The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial.
Proven by experiment!
Proven by peer review!

Ah, so if an object moves in a certain direction, then that must be
the direction of the force acting on it, according to Androcles.

Thus, we are to understand that because the Earth moves around in a
nearly circular orbit around the Sun, under the influence of gravity,
then the direction of the gravitational force must be in the direction
of the Earth's motion, tangent to the orbit. At least according to
Androcles.

Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and
yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind.

On Jan 7, 11:28*am, PD wrote:

Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and
yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind.
Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian
physics.
Further, you remember the days that he used to praise H.A.
Lorentz? He didn't understand, or even have read, anything by
Lorentz.
I got Androcles off of Lorentz.

In sci.math Darwin123 wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote:
Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and
yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind.
Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian
physics.
....

Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler.

--
[Full metal rebuttal:]
Not true.
-- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600

On 7 يناير, 22:15, wrote:
In sci.math Darwin123 wrote: On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote:
Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and
yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind.
Â* Â* Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian
physics.

...

Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler.

--
[Full metal rebuttal:]
Not true.
Â* -- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600

..
..
Viva.. the great hero of science Androcles .
Viva… Viva… Viva

Androcles footwear superior than the head of Einstein hordes ,
which they became a laughing stock all the time.

On 7 يناير, 22:18, Blissfull wrote:
On 7 يناير, 22:15, wrote:

In sci.math Darwin123 wrote: On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote:
Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and
yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind.
Â* Â* Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian
physics.

...

Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler.

--
[Full metal rebuttal:]
Not true.
Â* -- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600

.
.
Viva.. the great hero of science Androcles Â* .
Viva… Viva… Viva

Androcles footwear superior than the head of Einstein hordes ,
which they became a laughing stock all the time.

-

On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote:

"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --

Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.

So do you care to explain how the observer may simultaneously be
on the roundabout and not on the roundabout after having been thrown
off?

--
Andrew Smallshaw