|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
Take a look:
http://grist.org/politics/what-do-co...limate-change/ The interesting thing is that the insurance industry cannot afford to deny climate change. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 12:19:31 PM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote:
Take a look: http://grist.org/politics/what-do-co...limate-change/ From the beginning of the article: ".... people who just don't want to do anything about it." That describes you perfectly. With your flights to Hawaii and Chile and your long treks to NEAF, while laden with useless luxury goods, you are the poster child for the hypocritical, warmingista movement. You probably go through the express aisle with more than the max number of items too. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 12:19:31 PM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote:
The interesting thing is that the insurance industry cannot afford to deny climate change. The insurance industry can simply stop writing policies, at least in a free market. However, I am sure that you fascists can "fix" that. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 11:32:33 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 12:19:31 PM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote: Take a look: http://grist.org/politics/what-do-co...limate-change/ From the beginning of the article: ".... people who just don't want to do anything about it." That describes you perfectly. With your flights to Hawaii and Chile and your long treks to NEAF, while laden with useless luxury goods, you are the poster child for the hypocritical, warmingista movement. You probably go through the express aisle with more than the max number of items too. Hey, you're on a roll. Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel! The deep end is just moments away. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 3:25:12 PM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote:
On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 11:32:33 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote: On Monday, April 6, 2015 at 12:19:31 PM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote: Take a look: http://grist.org/politics/what-do-co...limate-change/ From the beginning of the article: ".... people who just don't want to do anything about it." That describes you perfectly. With your flights to Hawaii and Chile and your long treks to NEAF, while laden with useless luxury goods, you are the poster child for the hypocritical, warmingista movement. You probably go through the express aisle with more than the max number of items too. Hey, you're on a roll. Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel! The deep end is just moments away. Rather than cast insults, show us how you are not in the category of "people who just don't want to do anything about it [climate change.]" (Hint, your two Chevy Volts don't count.) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 1:05:33 PM UTC-4, Sam Wormley wrote:
Can Climate Scientists Make A Difference by Not Flying? http://www.climatecentral.org/news/c...s-flying-18864 edit I remind all readers that global warming is happening and that we are all in this together. Thus far the warmingistas have provided practically NO evidence of that notion, based on their personal behaviors. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 6:05:33 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote:
I remind all readers that global warming is happening and that we are all in this together. Make a difference by informing your friends, neighbors and the public at large. The planet warms every time a location turns into solar radiation within each 24 hours and cools as the stars of the great celestial arena come into view as the planet turns back into the shadow of the Earth. http://prairieecosystems.pbworks.com...0variation.jpg In one of the bewildering mode of thinking the people of the planet have ever seen, not because of its complexity but that the error can be corrected so easily, you will insist the Earth turns 366 1/4 times within an orbital circumference which takes roughly 365 days 6 hours to complete. "During one orbit around the Sun, Earth rotates about its own axis 366.26 times " Main Earth article Wikipedia I went for a walk today down by the ancient Knowth monument where people marked the Equinox in a most spectacular light show over 5200 years ago. How magnificent those people were in contrast to the utter chaos of you and the everyone else here who can't manage to assign the proper proportion of rotations to an orbital circumference. In others words, not a single one of you could build that astronomical clock - http://www.knowth.com/aerial/aerial-knowth.jpg Tell your friend and family indeed !, what do you tell them what is behind the experience of a day ?. If you believe there are 366 1/4 rotations within an orbital circuit it is not going to be a single rotation of the planet. This is where the real issue is. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climatechange?
On 4/7/15 12:40 PM, oriel36 wrote:
The planet warms every time a location turns into solar radiation within each 24 hours and cools as the stars of the great celestial arena come into view as the planet turns back into the shadow of the Earth. It is the cooling that is reduced by greenhouse gasses. http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Climate/Week1.html The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm In the 19th century, scientists realized that gases in the atmosphere cause a "greenhouse effect" which affects the planet's temperature. These scientists were interested chiefly in the possibility that a lower level of carbon dioxide gas might explain the ice ages of the distant past. At the turn of the century, Svante Arrhenius calculated that emissions from human industry might someday bring a global warming. Other scientists dismissed his idea as faulty. In 1938, G.S. Callendar argued that the level of carbon dioxide was climbing and raising global temperature, but most scientists found his arguments implausible. It was almost by chance that a few researchers in the 1950s discovered that global warming truly was possible. In the early 1960s, C.D. Keeling measured the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphe it was rising fast. Researchers began to take an interest, struggling to understand how the level of carbon dioxide had changed in the past, and how the level was influenced by chemical and biological forces. They found that the gas plays a crucial role in climate change, so that the rising level could gravely affect our future. (This essay covers only developments relating directly to carbon dioxide, with a separate essay for Other Greenhouse Gases. The History of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Earth http://www.planetforlife.com/co2history/index.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What do conservative policy intellectuals think about climate change?
On Tuesday, April 7, 2015 at 6:45:13 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 4/7/15 12:40 PM, oriel36 wrote: The planet warms every time a location turns into solar radiation within each 24 hours and cools as the stars of the great celestial arena come into view as the planet turns back into the shadow of the Earth. Every era has a chance to make its presence felt for future generations and the recovery of astronomy falls on our generation at this juncture where even the planet's daily temperature fluctuation comes into play in the most fundamental way in response to a single rotation each 24 hours. You insist the proportion of rotations to an orbital cycle is 366 1/4 rotations to 1 and contrary to every known experience of a rotation each 24 hours and extended on to February 29th which draws attention to the parent observation which determines the fractional proportion as 365 1/4 rotations to 1 orbital cycle. I am a supporter of funding even though I don't require it myself but for genuine researchers who see the big picture inherent in undoing the damage created by the 'scientific method' . The Earth is not a greenhouse and it warms and cools in two ways over the course of a annual circuit corresponding to two separate surface rotations to the central Sun. This is the foundation of planetary climate, period !. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Climate change will change thing, not for the better | Uncarollo2 | Amateur Astronomy | 89 | May 8th 14 03:04 PM |
Koch funded climate scientist reverses thinking - climate change IS REAL! | Uncarollo2 | Amateur Astronomy | 21 | August 8th 12 10:43 PM |
Conservative Change | Foul Weather Patriot | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 9th 08 03:59 PM |
- IDA policy Change | RMOLLISE | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 06 05:40 PM |
- IDA policy Change | Matthew Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 06 05:39 PM |