|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mathematical Definition of Simultaneity.
On Jan 19, 7:33 am, Tom Roberts wrote:
In math, a proof is a systematic demonstration of a logical deduction from axioms to the theorem being proved. Yes. shrug There is no analogous procedure in science. Nonsense. In engineering, what you said previously is constantly performed all the time. If not, engineers will be out of jobs. Physicists, on the other hand, can babble about bull**** without any consequences where in this case a bull**** is a claim that has not been backed up by sound mathematics. shrug In science an experiment probes some aspect of the world we inhabit. In math, there is no corresponding concept, because EVERYTHING in mathematics is imaginary (i.e. a concept that "exists" purely in human minds). An experiment is a test; in mathematics, either the relationship stated in a theorem holds or does not hold; there is no middle ground (but it may not be obvious to humans which is the case). It sounds like you are talking yourself in tossing mathematical support of a physical hypothesis out of the window. Please stop downgrade the importance of math in physics and in engineering as well. Math ultimately rules in physics to support a claim and in engineering as well. Without math, you only have philosophy where no one can prove you right or wrong. You become the generation of flower children. Smoking ganja? shrug HUMANS speak the language of math, and apply it to the world. It is REMARKABLE that this works so well, but nature is not at all constrained by the math humans apply to her behavior. Well, it is the jobs of engineers to model the world, within the specification imposed and beyond for margins, with mathematics. Anyone should expect the same standard to be applied to physicists. Is that too much to ask? So, physicists are just too stupid to model their world with sound mathematics, but engineers can. Again, engineers’ jobs depend on it while physicists can bull**** their way out of **** can without any rigorous mathematical proofs. It is no wonder a physicist can be amazed by a well modeled of the world in mathematics. What a fvcked up piece of so-called science that is. How can anyone call himself or herself a physicist without any shame? Oh, yes, the emperor’s clothes. shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mathematical Definition of Simultaneity. | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 8 | January 20th 12 02:31 AM |
simultaneity of relativity. | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | May 25th 06 02:48 PM |
simultaneity of relativity. | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 25th 06 02:48 PM |
Absolute simultaneity, AT ONCE (except in GR). | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | February 6th 06 08:21 AM |
Absolute simultaneity, AT ONCE (except in GR). | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 6th 06 08:21 AM |