|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
On Mar 15, 3:26*pm, "A Believer" wrote:
snip A_believer You have already lied. You told us that you were kill filing my posts. Now you respond to them. Not a great example to the kids, are you? |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
"Chris.Bee" wrote in message wrote: "You have already lied. You told us that you were kill filing my posts. Now you respond to them. Not a great example to the kids, are you?" Well, if I'm not a great example, what sort of horrendous, eccentric, sarcastic example does that make you? Far worse than a liar I would say. And now you are officially --------------------PLONKED---------------------- |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
On Mar 15, 6:29*pm, "A Believer" wrote:
Well, if I'm not a great example, what sort of horrendous, eccentric, sarcastic example does that make you? *Far worse than a liar I would say. And now you are officially --------------------PLONKED---------------------- Nah, nah, nų, nah, nah. Love Pink XX |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
"Chris L Peterson" wrote: There is no rational reason to believe that the Universe was created or that it is managed, and no practical reason for believing it either. Twelve step programs owe there success to the individual belief that there is a power beyond the self, and there is a LOT of evidence (in changed lives) to indicate that those programs work (for those who actually believe in that power). As for a creator who is actively managing things, well, that's just plain nuts. :-) Personally, my "view" on creation by intent, is that whoever, or whatever, fired the gun, included in the "cosmic DNA" everything necessary to start from dust and culminate in life. After firing the gun however, they went and joined there buds at the local bar for a shot and a beer in celebration. Having made a regular habit of said behavior, they too found need in a twelve step program based on their belief that there is a higher power, and have since been otherwise occupied. It's turtles all the way down... -Steve Paul (or something like that) |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:46:09 -0400, "Steve P."
wrote: Twelve step programs owe there success to the individual belief that there is a power beyond the self, and there is a LOT of evidence (in changed lives) to indicate that those programs work (for those who actually believe in that power). Well, that last clause is the key, isn't it? I've never doubted the efficacy of placebos. Certainly, there are highly effective programs for non-believers as well. Your example may provide an example of practical belief to those who already do so, but it would seem unreasonable to develop a belief (however one does that) just to join a twelve step program! _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
It is said that one must reach a low to find god.
Which another way of saying that if you sink low enough he will find you (wanting). Then why are churches usually built on high ground instead of in the gutter? Or in the basement? Are the churches now full of cured drug addicts and alcoholics as well as paedophiles? Finally, it's all beginning to make sense.... |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
"Chris.Bee" wrote: It is said that one must reach a low to find god. Which another way of saying that if you sink low enough he will find you (wanting). Life's general version of military basic training. g Then why are churches usually built on high ground instead of in the gutter? Or in the basement? Most of the churches that I've been too were in industrial parks, basements, and school buildings, and those folks that have erected more traditional buildings are of all religions, protestant, catholic, muslim and eastern based. You seem to have very limited exposure to middle class Christianity in the US, and/or knowledge of places where it is illegal to worship as you choose. I'm going to guess that you live somewhere that has a very long history of traditional and instituionalized Christianity, and some point in history it was the "state" religion. Remember that many of the first colonists to America were escaping exactly that, and that when the time came, the first Amendment of the US Constitution was written to guarantee that no state could establish (dictate) a religion. Not the second ammendment, or the third, ....but the first. This of course pretty much guarantees you're going to have the occasional loose canon, like David Koresh and others that have cropped up over the decades of American history (Heaven's Gate, Jim Jones), but there are factions and the disillusioned of every kind out there, and some are not religious but political. (KKK, rogue backwater militias (Timothy McVey sp?)). Are the churches now full of cured drug addicts and alcoholics as well as paedophiles? Not "full" but certainly there are those in Church who are borderline mentally ill, socially handicapped, disillusioned, and otherwise self afflicted. They are sitting right along side folks who are loving, accepting, and forgiving, and who will also hold them to account on a personal level, where the church encourages small groups to meet during the week outside of the congregational setting. Either way, I'd rather have them in church, than roaming the streets. At least in church, there's a chance that they will find the inner strength to overcome their afflictions, as with AA, or any other faith based self help program. That's the whole point of Christianity by the way. Jesus' intention was not to save the righteous, but to heal the sick, raise the dead, and cast out demons. If you are sick of your own thoughts, feel dead on the inside, or you have a past that haunts you, pretty much the best thing that can happen for you is being convinced that you are not a worthless pile of steeping dung who is either destined, or deserves to die a slow agonizing, self medicated death. This is made (and proven) possible through the belief that the creator of the universe knows of your afflictions, forgives you, and wants better for you than you are allowing for yourself. Face it, some people are in the psychological toilet, and the first step to pulling themselves up, is to surrender to the idea of a divine existence beyond the current sufferings of the mind, body, and emotions. This then develops into a (good) source of inspiration and motivation to reach out in healthful expression, as self gets out of the way. The self is never forgotten, never truly free, but controlled in life, and expressed primarily to the divine spirit in the privacy of prayer, unless you are otherwised moved to share your pain with others in a secure, loving, and accepting environment. Respectfully voicing our grievances to God, he gives us in return the strength to be good to others in the face of our weaknesses. Free self help that's been around since long before psychology and psychiatry became (costly) alternatives. Finally, it's all beginning to make sense.... I hope so. Religion is a good thing. Without it, there would likely be a doubling of all those ill minded behaviors which you ascribe to the church, and the prisons would be unable to afford to contain them. Word, Steve Paul |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
In article ,
"A Believer" wrote: "Chris.Bee" wrote in message "It always comes down to threats. When logical argument is pointless you threaten the opposition with your big, white robed Dad." I didn't threaten. I made a true statement about all mankind eventually being judged. Take it or leave it. I guess you choose the latter, but that is your unfortunate decision. The classic evasion of hypocritical bullies everywhere -- "Nice place you have he wouldn't it be a shame if something happened to it." Problem is, for such intimidation tactics to keep working you have to follow through once in a while, as without such reinforcement the fear on which you rely will eventually fade away. -- Odysseus |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
Evolution? Astronomy? Ah, do we need a moderator here! Skip this nuttiness,
and buy Michael Shermer's Why Darwin Matters. $15.00. Buy one for your local library while you're at it. Thank you, Charles Darwin, for your gift of evolution to the world. -- W. eWatson (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Complete proof against evolution
On Mar 17, 2:31*pm, "W. eWatson" wrote:
Evolution? Astronomy? Ah, do we need a moderator here! Skip this nuttiness, and buy Michael Shermer's Why Darwin Matters. $15.00. Buy one for your local library while you're at it. Thank you, Charles Darwin, for your gift of evolution to the world. -- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * W. eWatson * * * * * * * (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) * * * * * * * *Obz Site: *39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet That's the trouble with this era , people tend to diminish the actual evolutionary discoveries which cross disciplines,evolutionary biology began in the study of rock strata with a basic evolutionary time-line introduced by William Smith and all theses things eventually tie in with astronomy via the climate history of the planet contained in the strata , the stories they contain and the different effects geological and climatological events had on life on this magnificent planetary stage. http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolib.../_0/history_04 http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/WilliamSmith/ It is difficult to avoid the racket created by Darwin and his followers insofar as it distracts from the possibilities offered by evolution is releasing information as to the appearance of disappearance of lifeforms due to terrestrial conditions arising from geological,climatological and more importantly,astronomical influences be they short term events or long term changes due to the motions of the Earth or indeed, some other factor. The difference between genuine evolutionary investigations and the racket of "survival of the fittest" is the difference between interpretation and speculation,the former being a quality of those who work in a cross disciplinary way as opposed to those who have a blinkered one line approach of humans back to a pool of chemicals.There is no question that Darwin simply hopped on the'natural law' bandwagon,that he did it based on an essay on national supremacy is contrary to the investigations of those who had already added details to the existing evolutionary framework which shows a much older and magnificent planetary stage. Grow up. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Complete proof against evolution | Fossil Lin | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 11th 09 12:22 PM |
Proof of Evolution. | [email protected] | UK Astronomy | 1 | August 3rd 07 08:30 AM |
Proof Of Evolution. | sdr | UK Astronomy | 8 | July 21st 07 08:10 PM |
Proof Of Evolution. | sdr | Solar | 16 | July 21st 07 03:43 PM |
Proof Of Evolution. | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | July 20th 07 01:59 PM |