|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
I was watching a show the other night hosted by Stephen Hawking, about the
universe since it's creation up until now. I thought it was very well done is as much as I could actually understand most of it. But one thing was mentioned, and I wish I had written the numbers down, and that was that at so many seconds after the big bang, the universe was already so many thousands of light years across. I thought...HUH? If that were the case, then the universe, at that point, would have had to have been moving faster than the speed of light. to get that big is such a small span of time. Can anyone shed any light on this or should I have written the numbers down? Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
On May 14, 6:03*pm, wrote:
I was watching a show the other night hosted by Stephen Hawking, about the universe since it's creation up until now. I thought it was very well done is as much as I could actually understand most of it. But one thing was mentioned, and I wish I had written the numbers down, and that was that at so many seconds after the big bang, the universe was already so many thousands of light years across. I thought...HUH? If that were the case, then the universe, at that point, would have had to have been moving faster than the speed of light. to get that big is such a small span of time. Can anyone shed any light on this or should I have written the numbers down? Thanks. Entangled photons seem to have no problems with FTL. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
On May 14, 10:20*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 21:03:41 -0400, wrote: I was watching a show the other night hosted by Stephen Hawking, about the universe since it's creation up until now. I thought it was very well done is as much as I could actually understand most of it. But one thing was mentioned, and I wish I had written the numbers down, and that was that at so many seconds after the big bang, the universe was already so many thousands of light years across. I thought...HUH? If that were the case, then the universe, at that point, would have had to have been moving faster than the speed of light.. to get that big is such a small span of time. Can anyone shed any light on this or should I have written the numbers down? Thanks. Well you are thinking that the big bang started from one relatively small singularity. Try thinking of it this way When the big bang "banged" it banged everywhere Or perhaps we're just falling back into a singularity, thus making everything else seems as though its still an ongoing expansion. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
On Tue, 14 May 2013 18:27:18 -0700, Siri Cruise
wrote: The axiom is that things are allowed to move faster than light, as long as that is not being used transmit information. yeah I read lees book also but light itself is information. weather it is a single photon or an intense laser beam it still contains information. Theoretically space contracts faster than light inside an event horizon, carrying along particles at the same speed. This speeds combined with the limit on the speed of information is what creates the event horizon. never heard that before It is also theorised that space can expand faster than light, creating another kind of horizon. Galaxies carried away at superliminal speeds disappear beyond this horizon because any messages from them would be carried away faster than they could propagate. I think people will say anything that sounds good kinda like dark matter and dark energy. all sounds like BS. Just like the age of the universe is 13.7 billion years even though they may have found a star that is older than that. but because they cant see something they think it doesnt exist or they will say that faster than light is possible. ya know if space can expand faster than light then all the information in that space is moving faster than light and its mass has alread increased to infinity meaning there are some really fat creatures somewhere. Kinda makes ya wonder if you have infinite size then making babies may be really hard.. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
On May 14, 6:03*pm, wrote:
I was watching a show the other night hosted by Stephen Hawking, about the universe since it's creation up until now. I thought it was very well done is as much as I could actually understand most of it. But one thing was mentioned, and I wish I had written the numbers down, and that was that at so many seconds after the big bang, the universe was already so many thousands of light years across. I thought...HUH? If that were the case, then the universe, at that point, would have had to have been moving faster than the speed of light. to get that big is such a small span of time. Can anyone shed any light on this or should I have written the numbers down? Thanks. http://www.amazon.com/Inflationary-U...8662397&sr=1-1 Double-A |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
On May 15, 8:01*pm, Double-A wrote:
On May 14, 6:03*pm, wrote: I was watching a show the other night hosted by Stephen Hawking, about the universe since it's creation up until now. I thought it was very well done is as much as I could actually understand most of it. But one thing was mentioned, and I wish I had written the numbers down, and that was that at so many seconds after the big bang, the universe was already so many thousands of light years across. I thought...HUH? If that were the case, then the universe, at that point, would have had to have been moving faster than the speed of light. to get that big is such a small span of time. Can anyone shed any light on this or should I have written the numbers down? Thanks. http://www.amazon.com/Inflationary-U...p/0201328402/r... Double-A AA It those never found thyrons. No usefull information will ever come out of anything or actions going fazster than c.TreBert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:18:13 -0700 (PDT), "G=EMC^2"
wrote: On May 15, 8:01*pm, Double-A wrote: On May 14, 6:03*pm, wrote: I was watching a show the other night hosted by Stephen Hawking, about the universe since it's creation up until now. I thought it was very well done is as much as I could actually understand most of it. But one thing was mentioned, and I wish I had written the numbers down, and that was that at so many seconds after the big bang, the universe was already so many thousands of light years across. I thought...HUH? If that were the case, then the universe, at that point, would have had to have been moving faster than the speed of light. to get that big is such a small span of time. Can anyone shed any light on this or should I have written the numbers down? Thanks. http://www.amazon.com/Inflationary-U...p/0201328402/r... Double-A AA It those never found thyrons. No usefull information will ever come out of anything or actions going fazster than c.TreBert Trebert, will you since car tree huh star sun three following some yeah yeah go go go. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light surpassed?
On May 16, 12:18*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On May 15, 8:01*pm, Double-A wrote: On May 14, 6:03*pm, wrote: I was watching a show the other night hosted by Stephen Hawking, about the universe since it's creation up until now. I thought it was very well done is as much as I could actually understand most of it. But one thing was mentioned, and I wish I had written the numbers down, and that was that at so many seconds after the big bang, the universe was already so many thousands of light years across. I thought...HUH? If that were the case, then the universe, at that point, would have had to have been moving faster than the speed of light. to get that big is such a small span of time. Can anyone shed any light on this or should I have written the numbers down? Thanks. http://www.amazon.com/Inflationary-U...p/0201328402/r... Double-A AA It those never found thyrons. *No usefull information will ever come out of anything or actions going fazster than c.TreBert Except quantum communications via entangled photons seen to not be 'c' limited. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE SPEED OF LIGHT VARIES WITH THE SPEED OF THE OBSERVER | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 9 | March 3rd 12 10:55 AM |
Speed of individual photons cannot exceed speed of light in a vacuum | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 78 | August 11th 11 06:30 PM |
Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light??? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 9th 08 12:48 AM |
Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed. | [email protected] | Misc | 20 | September 4th 06 06:34 PM |
parllel universe have diffrent speed of light 128 168 300 299 thats how you find diffrent universe i'm from the planet earth that is the 7th from the sun stuck on one that the planet is 3rd from the sun the speed of light is 128 and 32 dimentions | Roger Wilco | Misc | 1 | December 30th 03 11:15 PM |