|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. This is
absurd. The collision will commence after 2 billion years. By that time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his planets. Even otherwise, solar system would perish in countless supernova explosions that follow the galaxy collision. Check out: http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
On Jun 8, 9:04*pm, signifiespost wrote:
NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. *This is absurd. *The collision will commence after 2 billion years. *By that time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his planets. Even otherwise, *solar system would perish in countless supernova explosions that follow the galaxy collision. Check out: *http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/ The red giant phase should hold off for at least another 3 billion years. Gravity tidal issues will likely cause more grief than physical encounters. Asteroid and/or planetoid encounter odds should increase by a billion fold. Correct, in that such a monumental galactic encounter will be highly problematic and most likely lethal to our ways of existing. Tunneling into our moon could prove as a very smart kind of lifeboat. Do you have a plan for the ultimate survival of humanity? http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
On Jun 9, 9:19*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 8, 9:04*pm, signifiespost wrote: NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. *This is absurd. *The collision will commence after 2 billion years. *By that time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his planets. Even otherwise, *solar system would perish in countless supernova explosions that follow the galaxy collision. Check out: *http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/ The red giant phase should hold off for at least another 3 billion years. Gravity tidal issues will likely cause more grief than physical encounters. Asteroid and/or planetoid encounter odds should increase by a billion fold. Correct, in that such a monumental galactic encounter will be highly problematic and most likely lethal to our ways of existing. Tunneling into our moon could prove as a very smart kind of lifeboat. Do you have a plan for the ultimate survival of humanity? *http://groups.google.com/groups/search *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus 1. First we have to search for some nomad planets with favorable conditions for at least saving at least human gene plasm! 2. We should send space & time capsules with these gene seeds! Thanks. bhatt |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
On Jun 8, 10:30*pm, signifiespost wrote:
On Jun 9, 9:19*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 8, 9:04*pm, signifiespost wrote: NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. *This is absurd. *The collision will commence after 2 billion years. *By that time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his planets. Even otherwise, *solar system would perish in countless supernova explosions that follow the galaxy collision. Check out: *http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/ The red giant phase should hold off for at least another 3 billion years. Gravity tidal issues will likely cause more grief than physical encounters. Asteroid and/or planetoid encounter odds should increase by a billion fold. Correct, in that such a monumental galactic encounter will be highly problematic and most likely lethal to our ways of existing. Tunneling into our moon could prove as a very smart kind of lifeboat. Do you have a plan for the ultimate survival of humanity? *http://groups.google.com/groups/search *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus 1. *First we have to search for some nomad planets with favorable conditions for at least saving at least human gene plasm! 2. *We should send space & time capsules with these gene seeds! Thanks. bhatt The spendy and badly delayed JWST should spot large numbers of such cool items headed our way. No sense chasing after stuff that's headed away from us or even already passing us. You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's sufficiently nearby. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote:
You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's sufficiently nearby. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly called "Earth's second moon"" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
On Friday, June 8, 2012 9:04:05 PM UTC-7, signifiespost wrote:
NASA states that nothing will happen to our Solar system. This is absurd. The collision will commence after 2 billion years. By that time, Sun would have turned into a red dwarf star gobbling up all his planets. Even otherwise, solar system would perish in countless supernova explosions that follow the galaxy collision. Check out: http://signifies.net/our-galaxy-heading-for-an-end/ Hmm.............. I guess we can stay up tonite and wait for it ;-) Red Giant first with gooble then red dwarf. Anyway the planet maybe in the too warm zone in less than a billion. Mars will warm a bit but its too small for a good planet, IMO. The species or it next form may make the big jump perhaps even spreading its seed in a manner that hedges its bets on home planets. All in the Makers good time..............Trig |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
On Jun 9, 9:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote:
On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote: You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's sufficiently nearby. *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne *From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly called "Earth's second moon"" From the very begging of your life, you've never contributed anything original (unless flatulence counts), nor having improved one interpretation of anything. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
In article
, Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 9, 9:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote: On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote: You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's sufficiently nearby. *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne *From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly called "Earth's second moon"" From the very begging of your life, you've never contributed anything original (unless flatulence counts), nor having improved one interpretation of anything. Pot? Kettle???? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
On Jun 12, 11:11*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote: In article , *Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 9, 9:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote: On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote: You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's sufficiently nearby. *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne *From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly called "Earth's second moon"" From the very begging of your life, you've never contributed anything original (unless flatulence counts), nor having improved one interpretation of anything. Pot? Kettle???? So, you agree that Alan Erskine is as worthless as any human (excluding myself) on Earth can possibly get. At least I can fully support that interpretation of yours. How about your own contributions: got any? http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Our galaxy heading for collision with Andromeda Galaxy
In article
, Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 12, 11:11*am, Orval Fairbairn wrote: In article , *Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 9, 9:41*pm, Alan Erskine wrote: On 10/06/2012 7:35 AM, Brad Guth wrote: You do realize we have a second moon "Cruithne" of 1.3e14 kg that's sufficiently nearby. *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3753_Cruithne *From the very item you posted, goothtroll: "It has been incorrectly called "Earth's second moon"" From the very begging of your life, you've never contributed anything original (unless flatulence counts), nor having improved one interpretation of anything. Pot? Kettle???? So, you agree that Alan Erskine is as worthless as any human (excluding myself) on Earth can possibly get. At least I can fully support that interpretation of yours. How about your own contributions: got any? http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus If I told you, I'd have to shoot you. ;) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Andromeda Galaxy or US (What if) | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 15 | June 7th 06 02:09 PM |
Andromeda Galaxy or US (What if) | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | May 31st 06 01:37 PM |
Andromeda Galaxy | Pete Lawrence | UK Astronomy | 6 | November 28th 05 01:53 PM |
andromeda galaxy | helen abdullahi | Misc | 7 | January 10th 05 03:48 AM |
andromeda galaxy? | aquablue | Misc | 6 | March 18th 04 10:10 AM |