|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pluto's 17 degree tilt explained as magnetic electric motorinstability? #158; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory
I was trying to refresh my memory of how you can
achieve instability in a running electric motor. Because in Positron-Space-Gravity the plane of ecliptic is not due to a Nebular Dust Cloud condensation of planetesimals and angular momemtum, but rather, the Sun's plane of ecliptic which all the planets follow except Pluto's 17 degree tilt. In Positron Space Gravity the explanation of plane of ecliptic is due to the Coulomb force of the Sun's positron-space-center is attracting the matter of the planets (electron matter of the Atom-Totality). And coupled with the spin rotation of the Sun as a magnet forces the orbits of all the planets into a equatorial plane of the Sun-- the ecliptic plane. So I need to review Electromagnetism to see if I have it correct. So what I want is a picture of the Sun as a magnet and the planets as hollow metal spheres attracted by the magnet-Sun. The attraction causes the planets to not go out into far off space on their own linear momentum but captures them into an orbit around the Sun. But here is the quandary. Can this EM magnetic Sun cause all those planets, which may or may not have had a tilt larger than Pluto's 17 degree tilt. Would that EM-magnetic Sun force those planets to all come down or up in their tilt and end up orbiting around the Sun on its ecliptic plane? So I am searching back in EM as to instabilities in electric motors that is similar to the above idea. Some electric motors have an instability of finding and holding onto their magnetic centers and there ends up with a problem in the axial and speed of motor. But rather than look for instabilities, I really should be looking for how well electric motors run and their efficiency can be as close to 100% at high wattage. Recently on the news someone spoke of the energy efficiency of an electric car as 70 to 80 percent whereas the combustion engine was a meager 12%. This is favorable news for my above ideas, because the ability of the Sun to have all the planets except Pluto on that ecliptic plane and for Saturn to have nearly all its rings on a plane, conforms with the idea that the force is nearly 100% efficient. Now it is probably coincidence that only Pluto is the faraway exception at 17% tilt. So can I say that the Sun if it were seen as an electric motor is 83% efficient since it has not corrected the 17% tilt of Pluto? So what I really need to find out is the "righting behaviour" or the self correcting behaviour of electric motors and not the sources of instability. So why is the electric motor reaching nearly 100% energy efficiency? And that would be a "least energy concept" as an answer. That somehow, an electric motor can turn EM into axial rotation with almost no loss of energy transfer. So how does that come into my quandary? My picture of the Sun as a magnetic center and that forces the planets, at whatever random orbit they may initially have to force them into ending up in the Sun's ecliptic plane. I believe that "righting or correcting mechanism" is the spin rotation of the Sun as a magnet. So that let us imagine for a moment that Jupiter was tiny some 5 billion years ago and was orbiting around the Sun which was huge compared to Jupiter and twice as old. But that this ancient Jupiter was orbiting much like Pluto at say 20 degree tilt from the Sun's ecliptic. So each year in the orbit of Jupiter around the Sun a tiny increment of a degree from the 20 degree tilt was shaved off of Jupiter simply from the fact that the spin rotation of the Sun magnet causes that forcing of the ancient Jupiter to come closer in line with the plane of ecliptic. If I am true in the above accounting, then this should be the process going on right now in the planet Pluto of its 17 degree tilt. That each year a miniscule fraction of that 17 degree tilt is shaved off and tending towards a 0 degree tilt by Pluto. And the cause for that tendency, as I repeatedly spoke of is the coupling of the Sun's magnet with its spin rotation. Now I could drop most everyone and dive into this for detail, but I need to focus on getting this book done and in future editions hammer on the details. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
what is the latest we know of Pluto and its 17 degree tilt? #159; 3rded; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory
--- quoting in parts from a NASA website ---
NASA New Horizons: The PI's Perspective: One-Third Down STATUS REPORT Date Released: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 Source: Johns Hopkins University APL New Horizons Mission http:// pluto.jhuapl.edu/index.php Alan Stern We passed the milestone of being one-third of the distance to Pluto last year, but today - March 19, 2009 - after 38 months and almost 2 billion kilometers of flight, New Horizons has completed precisely one- third of the days in its journey to Pluto. ....... Lellouch and his coworkers also found that Pluto's diameter must be 2,340 kilometers or larger - so previous estimates of 2,300 kilometers or less have now been ruled out --- end quoting --- I figured there was not going to be any science news on whether the tilt of 17 degrees by Pluto is decreasing and verging to tending to that of the Sun's planar ecliptic. And I do not know if this spacecraft can handle the precision needed to measure whether the 17 degrees is decreasing and verging to become 16 degrees then 15 etc etc until it becomes almost 0. Being the furthest planet (define planet as object in AP-Titius Bode Rule), we may have to wait centuries into the future to get a handle on the question of whether the tilt of 17 degrees is decreasing. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 13th 09 04:00 PM |
magnetic fields of planets explained by Positron-Space-gravity #140;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 12th 09 06:37 AM |
can solid-body rotation alone prove the Universe is an atom? #131;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 9th 09 05:57 AM |
where is the dark-matter, obviously, the Nucleus of the Atom Totality#127 ; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 7th 09 07:32 PM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |