|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why this Mars Rover landed successfully.
The successful landing etc may have been due in part to not
issuing navigation control commands that depended too closely on the assumption that it takes about 10 minutes to send a signal and about 10 to receive a signal. The previous failures may in part have been due to the failure to avoid such commands and the previous successes to inadvertently avoiding such commands. The NYTimes noted that "Its onboard computer was in complete charge..." perhaps in contrast to previous failed attempts in navigating the descent. So maybe Heller and Owen passed along my concerns in 2000 even if they did not accept entirely the argument that light speed delay does not extrapolate beyond a second or so and that evidence that seems to support this can be interpreted otherwise (see http://www.bestweb.net/~sansbury) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why this Mars Rover landed successfully.
In message , ralph sansbury
writes Nothing. Ignore him. Please. Plonk. -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why this Mars Rover landed successfully.
That is because it didn't land on Mars. It is really on a stage at
Paramont Studios in Hollywood. I think I've seen that set a number of times in a few Star Trek movies. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why this Mars Rover landed successfully.
"Sci-Fi" wrote:
That is because it didn't land on Mars. It is really on a stage at Paramont Studios in Hollywood. I think I've seen that set a number of times in a few Star Trek movies. The joke's on you. The Star Trek sets are on Mars. They were built decades ago, using the moon landings as a diversion so those high school kids and other hobbyists who intercept telemetry wouldn't see what was going on. Do you actually think that 80,000 foot mountain on Mars is a natural feature? It's made of camo net. All battles between Enterprise and the bad guys are filmed inside it. If you don't believe me, ask your daddy. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why this Mars Rover landed successfully.
John Griffin wrote in message .1.4...
"Sci-Fi" wrote: That is because it didn't land on Mars. It is really on a stage at Paramont Studios in Hollywood. I think I've seen that set a number of times in a few Star Trek movies. The joke's on you. The Star Trek sets are on Mars. They were built decades ago, using the moon landings as a diversion so those high school kids and other hobbyists who intercept telemetry wouldn't see what was going on. Do you actually think that 80,000 foot mountain on Mars is a natural feature? It's made of camo net. All battles between Enterprise and the bad guys are filmed inside it. If you don't believe me, ask your daddy. those were all outtakes from _Diamonds Are Forever_ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Mars in opposition: One for the record books (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 3rd 03 04:56 PM |