A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Big Bang, Creation or Chance?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 13th 06, 07:13 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.astronomy
wcb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Big Bang, Creation or Chance?

HeatWave wrote:

MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was
created by an intelligent Creator. So they speculate that it somehow
just came into existence by itself. But no one has been able to explain
how that could happen.

Actually, it is as the magazine Scientific American reported in its
January 1999 issue: ?The big bang theory does not describe the birth of
the universe.? The magazine added: ?Another theory describing even
earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the
universe.?


Google Alan Guth, bubble universe.

There is a LOT for you to learn

--
"The world holds two classes of men -- intelligent
men without religion, and religious men without
intelligence".
- Abu'l-Ala-Al-Ma'arri (973-1057; Syrian poet)

Cheerful Charlie
  #2  
Old August 14th 06, 03:11 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.astronomy
HeatWave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Big Bang, Creation or Chance?

MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was
created by an intelligent Creator. So they speculate that it somehow
just came into existence by itself. But no one has been able to explain
how that could happen.

Actually, it is as the magazine Scientific American reported in its
January 1999 issue: “The big bang theory does not describe the birth of
the universe.” The magazine added: “Another theory describing even
earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the
universe.”
  #3  
Old August 14th 06, 03:18 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.astronomy
Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Big Bang, Creation or Chance?

HeatWave:

MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was
created by an intelligent Creator.


Unsupported assertion, until and unless you provide evidence.
And while we are at it, it's the typical cheap cop-out for fundies who know
they can't deal with reality.

The magazine added: ?Another theory describing even
earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the
universe.?


Another unsupported assertion (that "creation" of the universe is considered
a fact).
Evidence? None? Thought so.

--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...

My personal judgment of monotheism:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
  #4  
Old August 14th 06, 03:23 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.astronomy
HeatWave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Big Bang, Creation or Chance?

Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian wrote:
HeatWave:

MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was
created by an intelligent Creator.


Unsupported assertion, until and unless you provide evidence.
And while we are at it, it's the typical cheap cop-out for fundies who know
they can't deal with reality.

The magazine added: ?Another theory describing even
earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the
universe.?


Another unsupported assertion (that "creation" of the universe is considered
a fact).
Evidence? None? Thought so.


Take it up with scientific american I gave you the year and date of the
publication. Next you are going to claim it is a fundie magazine.
  #5  
Old August 14th 06, 03:27 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.physics,alt.astronomy
HeatWave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Origin of the Universe; Physicists ponder on the Big Bang event


Physicist Charles H. Townes observed: "It is true that physicists
hope to look behind the 'big bang,' and possibly to explain the origin
of our universe as, for example, a type of fluctuation. But then, of
what is it a fluctuation and how did this in turn begin to exist? In my
view, the question of origin seems always left unanswered if we explore
from a scientific view alone."
  #6  
Old August 14th 06, 03:29 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.physics,alt.astronomy
HeatWave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Infinite Universe?

It is now accepted that the universe at one time did not exist and
that by some means it came into existence. Can what has been learned
about the laws of the universe help us to understand how this could have
happened?
  #7  
Old August 14th 06, 03:34 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.physics,alt.astronomy
Thurisaz the Einherjer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Origin of the Universe; Physicists ponder on the Big Bang event

HeatWave:

"...In my
view, the question of origin seems always left unanswered if we explore
from a scientific view alone."


origin question unanswered != creation is a fact


--
Romans 2:24 revised:
"For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you
cretinists, as it is written on aig."

My personal judgment of monotheism: http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
  #8  
Old August 14th 06, 03:35 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.astronomy
Thurisaz the Einherjer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Big Bang, Creation or Chance?

HeatWave:

Take it up with scientific american I gave you the year and date of the
publication. Next you are going to claim it is a fundie magazine.


No need to. Such quotes are _always_ bullcrap. If I have learned one single
thing in three years of examining the jebus death cult then it is that
fundies lie whenever their lips (or hands, on the keyboard) are moving.

--
Romans 2:24 revised:
"For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you
cretinists, as it is written on aig."

My personal judgment of monotheism: http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
  #9  
Old August 14th 06, 03:47 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.astronomy
Enkidu[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Big Bang, Creation or Chance?

HeatWave wrote in news:KZQDg.811$Ji1.287
@trnddc05:

MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was
created by an intelligent Creator. So they speculate that it somehow
just came into existence by itself. But no one has been able to explain
how that could happen.

Actually, it is as the magazine Scientific American reported in its
January 1999 issue: “The big bang theory does not describe the birth of
the universe.” The magazine added: “Another theory describing even
earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the
universe.”


It's clear from the punctuation used in your posts that you do nothing
but steal other people's work.

--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA

If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier -- so
long as I'm the dictator.
--George W. Bush, Dec. 19, 2000
  #10  
Old August 14th 06, 03:55 AM posted to talk.religion.christian.jehovah-witness,alt.talk.creationism,alt.atheism,sci.skeptic,alt.astronomy
Matt Silberstein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default Big Bang, Creation or Chance?

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:11:54 GMT, in alt.atheism , HeatWave
in KZQDg.811$Ji1.287@trnddc05 wrote:

MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was
created by an intelligent Creator. So they speculate that it somehow
just came into existence by itself. But no one has been able to explain
how that could happen.


How does adding a creator, intelligent or not, into the mix somehow
explain things better?

Actually, it is as the magazine Scientific American reported in its
January 1999 issue: “The big bang theory does not describe the birth of
the universe.” The magazine added: “Another theory describing even
earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the
universe.”


And adding "and g(G)od(s) did it" adds what?



--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New look at microwave background may cast doubts on big bang theory(Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 3 September 8th 05 07:40 AM
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory Br Dan Izzo Astronomy Misc 8 September 7th 04 12:07 AM
The backward primitive cosmology of the Big Bang Mad Scientist Misc 6 September 2nd 04 04:27 AM
is there a center to the Big Bang cosmology? Mad Scientist Misc 12 August 27th 04 12:08 AM
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? Yoda Misc 102 August 2nd 04 02:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.