|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang, Creation or Chance?
HeatWave wrote:
MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was created by an intelligent Creator. So they speculate that it somehow just came into existence by itself. But no one has been able to explain how that could happen. Actually, it is as the magazine Scientific American reported in its January 1999 issue: ?The big bang theory does not describe the birth of the universe.? The magazine added: ?Another theory describing even earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the universe.? Google Alan Guth, bubble universe. There is a LOT for you to learn -- "The world holds two classes of men -- intelligent men without religion, and religious men without intelligence". - Abu'l-Ala-Al-Ma'arri (973-1057; Syrian poet) Cheerful Charlie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang, Creation or Chance?
MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was
created by an intelligent Creator. So they speculate that it somehow just came into existence by itself. But no one has been able to explain how that could happen. Actually, it is as the magazine Scientific American reported in its January 1999 issue: “The big bang theory does not describe the birth of the universe.” The magazine added: “Another theory describing even earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the universe.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang, Creation or Chance?
HeatWave:
MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was created by an intelligent Creator. Unsupported assertion, until and unless you provide evidence. And while we are at it, it's the typical cheap cop-out for fundies who know they can't deal with reality. The magazine added: ?Another theory describing even earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the universe.? Another unsupported assertion (that "creation" of the universe is considered a fact). Evidence? None? Thought so. -- "To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite; But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet." (The Poetic Edda) Must have been written with fundies in mind... My personal judgment of monotheism: http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang, Creation or Chance?
Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian wrote:
HeatWave: MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was created by an intelligent Creator. Unsupported assertion, until and unless you provide evidence. And while we are at it, it's the typical cheap cop-out for fundies who know they can't deal with reality. The magazine added: ?Another theory describing even earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the universe.? Another unsupported assertion (that "creation" of the universe is considered a fact). Evidence? None? Thought so. Take it up with scientific american I gave you the year and date of the publication. Next you are going to claim it is a fundie magazine. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Origin of the Universe; Physicists ponder on the Big Bang event
Physicist Charles H. Townes observed: "It is true that physicists hope to look behind the 'big bang,' and possibly to explain the origin of our universe as, for example, a type of fluctuation. But then, of what is it a fluctuation and how did this in turn begin to exist? In my view, the question of origin seems always left unanswered if we explore from a scientific view alone." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Infinite Universe?
It is now accepted that the universe at one time did not exist and
that by some means it came into existence. Can what has been learned about the laws of the universe help us to understand how this could have happened? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Origin of the Universe; Physicists ponder on the Big Bang event
HeatWave:
"...In my view, the question of origin seems always left unanswered if we explore from a scientific view alone." origin question unanswered != creation is a fact -- Romans 2:24 revised: "For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you cretinists, as it is written on aig." My personal judgment of monotheism: http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang, Creation or Chance?
HeatWave:
Take it up with scientific american I gave you the year and date of the publication. Next you are going to claim it is a fundie magazine. No need to. Such quotes are _always_ bullcrap. If I have learned one single thing in three years of examining the jebus death cult then it is that fundies lie whenever their lips (or hands, on the keyboard) are moving. -- Romans 2:24 revised: "For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you cretinists, as it is written on aig." My personal judgment of monotheism: http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang, Creation or Chance?
HeatWave wrote in news:KZQDg.811$Ji1.287
@trnddc05: MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was created by an intelligent Creator. So they speculate that it somehow just came into existence by itself. But no one has been able to explain how that could happen. Actually, it is as the magazine Scientific American reported in its January 1999 issue: “The big bang theory does not describe the birth of the universe.” The magazine added: “Another theory describing even earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the universe.” It's clear from the punctuation used in your posts that you do nothing but steal other people's work. -- Enkidu AA#2165 http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/ EAC Chaplain and ordained minister, ULC, Modesto, CA If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier -- so long as I'm the dictator. --George W. Bush, Dec. 19, 2000 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bang, Creation or Chance?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 02:11:54 GMT, in alt.atheism , HeatWave
in KZQDg.811$Ji1.287@trnddc05 wrote: MANY scientists are uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was created by an intelligent Creator. So they speculate that it somehow just came into existence by itself. But no one has been able to explain how that could happen. How does adding a creator, intelligent or not, into the mix somehow explain things better? Actually, it is as the magazine Scientific American reported in its January 1999 issue: “The big bang theory does not describe the birth of the universe.” The magazine added: “Another theory describing even earlier times will be needed to explain the original creation of the universe.” And adding "and g(G)od(s) did it" adds what? -- Matt Silberstein Do something today about the Darfur Genocide http://www.beawitness.org http://www.darfurgenocide.org http://www.savedarfur.org "Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New look at microwave background may cast doubts on big bang theory(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 3 | September 8th 05 07:40 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 7th 04 12:07 AM |
The backward primitive cosmology of the Big Bang | Mad Scientist | Misc | 6 | September 2nd 04 04:27 AM |
is there a center to the Big Bang cosmology? | Mad Scientist | Misc | 12 | August 27th 04 12:08 AM |
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? | Yoda | Misc | 102 | August 2nd 04 02:33 AM |