|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Oh, I didn't mean looking into the beam. Someone added that
annotation. I meant looking the reflection of the laser off the wall. I might give it a try tonight, will let you know. Mark canopus56 wrote: Mark wrote: Stand 6 feet away (just to the side of the beam) and take a flash photograph [looking into the beam]. It seems to me that if laser is brighter than the flash, the spot will still be visible in the picture. Any thoughts? Is this a valid experiment? I don't know. On first impression, the laser pointer's coherent beam is less than the diameter of the human eye pupil and the camera iris. The flash bulb's light is dispersed across a wide-area larger than the human eye pupil and the camera iris. Therefore, the general public might disregard any analogy between the two light sources. But your idea sounds like it's worth a digital camera click and flash. (On second thought, I'd do that test with film and not risk damage to a digital camera chip.) Because the laser beam is only 1-2mm in diameter at 2 meters and the beam is similar in brightness to the -26 mag Sun's disk, I would expect the beam to still be visible in the flash. Let the group know what you find. - Canopus56 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
n what the beam does at
distances greater than 300ft (e.g. stepping in and out of the beam at a large distance with a brief, glancing eye exposure) - just so I'll have Your exposing your eyesight to a hazard that might not be reversable. Why not use a photographic light meter and then plot Lumens agaist distance from center. This would be a lot more quantitative and subject to analysis. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Too late - empirical evidence suggests very that brief exposure from a
distance of approximately 18 inches results in no lasting damage, and nothing detectable beyond 5 minutes or so. :-) HAVRILIAK wrote: n what the beam does at distances greater than 300ft (e.g. stepping in and out of the beam at a large distance with a brief, glancing eye exposure) - just so I'll have Your exposing your eyesight to a hazard that might not be reversable. Why not use a photographic light meter and then plot Lumens agaist distance from center. This would be a lot more quantitative and subject to analysis. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Too late - empirical evidence suggests very that brief exposure from a distance of approximately 18 inches results in no lasting damage, and nothing detectable beyond 5 minutes or so. :-) BRBR The most important question in such a LASER test is did you have your eyes focused at infinity? If you were focused at the head 18 inches away, you will get a fairly large blur circle on the retina. If focused at infinity (LASER is the same as the object distance being infinite -- parellel rays) you can get all the power in a very small dot on the retina. It is an old lab trick to keep your eyes focused on nearby objects when working with LASERs. -- Charlie Springer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flash Blinded By Green Laser | Gary Honis | Amateur Astronomy | 136 | January 29th 05 04:09 AM |
More on Green Laser Concerns.... | Ted Nichols II | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | January 5th 05 06:06 PM |
Stargazer arrested for using green laser | John Denver | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 5th 05 04:58 PM |
A Taxonomy of Auroras | Canopus | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 12th 04 08:03 AM |
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are | william mook | Policy | 157 | November 19th 03 12:19 AM |