|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
"fossilized fuel" is a tradename of energy colgomes,
with no technical meaning, whatsoever; thank you. Electric cars have now been touted as potential battery stores for our homes. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
On Mar 25, 8:19*pm, Rich wrote:
Brad Guth wrote : On Mar 23, 10:41*pm, Rich wrote: columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote in news:145121ea-1f3d-4e55-a3ab- : On Mar 23, 5:29*am, "$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto" wrote: Their Earth Explorer, in addition to being used to promote the hoax of AGW, is being used to find more oil. *Nice to see some balance at th at decrepit organization. its called earth observations, are you claiming we should understand other planets better than our own? Give the task to other organizations, NOT NASA. Exactly, our public funding shouldn't be utilized to benefit Big Energy that has no intentions of sharing back any cent of profits from our investments. *If we start thinking we can trust our DARPA and NASA, we might as well trust Hitler, GW Bush, Dick Cheney and Kissinger again. *http://groups.google.com/groups/search *http://translate.google.com/# *Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” You stupid dope. *What do you suppose would happen if we ditched oil, coal, etc? *In addition to spending 50% of our income of B.S. alternate energy, the SAME kind of corporations who run oil would run wind and solar. *Fool. As long as you and others of your sucking kind continually refuse to police those of your own kind, the global energy markets will remain as a corrupt mafia of insiders and/or faith-based cabal that gets to do as they please. I've pointed this out as of more than a decade ago, actually starting my rants about this as of 1968. Hydrogen is still unlimited, and it's essentially as renewable as oxygen. Carbon is not essential to creating good amounts of energy, much less capable of clean energy, and otherwise a much smaller global carbon footprint of perhaps 10% is technically doable. Why are you and others of your oligarch sucking kind always so opposed to creating and using hydrogen peroxide? Photons are forever, and now Boeing has developed a 100% PV conversion efficiency factor. You obviously got a big problem with that. What's so freaking wrong with using geothermal and wind derived energy. Why are you mainstream Rothschild diehards opposed to using thorium fueled reactors? When have I ever in my life specified 100% dumping or stoppage of global hydrocarbon usage? Only a diehard Zionist Nazi oligarch like yourself would have reacted by lying exactly as you have demonstrated. So, what's your pathetic excuse this time? Tell us, why don't you police your own kind? http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
hydrogen is not a source of energy, chemically;
nor is it renewable, in the sense of fusion. anyway, what's that that Boeing has found? every means has its associated problems; by all means, use them all, including "fossilized fuelsTM." Photons are forever, and now Boeing has developed a 100% PV conversion efficiency factor. *You obviously got a big problem with that. What's so freaking wrong with using geothermal and wind derived energy. Why are you mainstream Rothschild diehards opposed to using thorium fueled reactors? thus quoth: Radiation (UNSCEAR) as an ideal example of how an independent and objective scientific report should be prepared, in this case a report on the global risks from all sources of radiation, including nuclear weapons and Chernobyl. The UNSCEAR assessments presented each year to the U.N. General Assembly are regarded as a bible of the science of ionizing radiation. Yes, UNSCEAR mostly fits Nature’s description—but for a price. Because UNSCEAR’s scientific reports often widely differed from the catastrophic views of the United Nations Environmental Programme or of the former U.N. Secretary-General, the U.N. bureaucracy has squeezed the finances of UNSCEAR, down to a level that caused almost a complete halt of its activity (Jaworowski 2002). http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.co...O2_Scandal.pdf the IPCC for anything more than a political organization soliciting thus: I already knew, before these semi-official events -- totally in thrall of the mainstream nonsequiter of "global" warming, in fact -- that this was the case for Antarctica; the Man from NOAA, Swiss affiliate, showed that it was true of GrIS, and I recently found out that it was true of #3, the main icecap on Iceland. these icesheets have only increased in heighth, since the measurements began. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
On Mar 26, 10:24*am, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Mar 26, 5:19*am, Rich wrote: You stupid dope. *What do you suppose would happen if we ditched oil, coal, etc? *In addition to spending 50% of our income of B.S. alternate energy, the SAME kind of corporations who run oil would run wind and solar. *Fool. Whoah! Let's not be quite so quick to attack the dope. Wind and solar have the almost unique ability to provide independent energy free of the monster energy companies. Without the corrosive demand for ever higher quarterly payments mankind could suddenly find itself severed from the treadmill of work. No need to commute for miles merely to keep warm and enjoy the benefits of electricity. Much of which is wasted over very long supply cables and conversion from AC to DC in our domestic apparatus. The world needs to save energy more than it needs to increase energy output. Why no global home insulation drive? Because it keeps us tied to the Big Providers. Africa is discovering oil just as we need their dirt cheap labour to make more **** as China becomes too expensive. Who will make the dirt cheap **** now? Robots? Electric cars have now been touted as potential battery stores for our homes. Take transport (too) out of the list of holds which employment has over us and it all begins to look quite rosy. Why do we need coal and oil when we can live independent from them? This new found freedom should be top of the right wing political agenda if individual freedom really is their goal for all. Imagine a world where our actual working hours shrank back to that of the caveman? A world where self expression and real talents could find value to society again. Instead of being passive consumers and slaves to the treadmill we could all lead our own lives. Instead of merely contributing to the obscenity of the already, utterly pointlessly wealthy. It won't happen of course. We are all too addicted to wasting our lives away. Worshipping the infinite gradations of status and hierarchy. Filling our empty hours by collecting worthless, ephemeral detritus and paying to be amused by others less talented than ourselves. Even YouTube is changing its Open Contribution policy to something far more commercial and saleable. I blame TV for most of it. Before TV people made things for themselves and amused themselves with their own natural talents. CNC ended mechanical talent. TV the ability to think for oneself. Hobbies became something other people did. While we passively looked on. Bemused and critical by turns on our TVs. Or scribbling semi-literate, obscene comments on YouTube. Exactly, we as the supposedly most intelligent species can do way better than global exploiting and living off hydrocarbons, and otherwise putting us a risk by using uranium primarily for creating plutonium that goes mostly into our WMD. The past, current and future K12s are basically screwed-over by their very own parents, grandparents and their peers as faith-based protected and by those having authority, wealth and mafia like power over whomever we elect or appoint. By not policing their own bullish and selfish kind is exactly what causes wars, inflation and global disparity that they don't see anything wrong with. 99% of Americans are totally wasted on junk foods, snookered and dumbfounded by eyecandy, consumer packaging hype and into playing of games plus into social/political media pretending that usually ends up neglecting and/or hurting others. The ability to take better care of themselves, staying out of trouble and much less help others is getting mainstream nullified, because they haven't been properly educated nor much less allowed to think or act for themselves. http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
On Mar 29, 10:51*pm, Al Wilson wrote:
the new prius c is so cute - i want 2 take 1 home an give it lots of (((((hugs))))) xxxxxxx * my baby prius xxxxxx Y'all really don't have much imagination, do you? The Prius is not remotely green. It is rolling, marketing hype for middle class chumps in the absence of serious, all electric vehicles for the man and woman in the street. The total CO2 load of producing the damned things makes a mockery of any saving in CO2 released at the dripping exhaust pipe. Particularly since it is usually recharged with coal-fired electricity. The vast majority of vehicles carry only the driver. Only over a relatively short journey to collect the next fix of sugar from the supermarket. So smaller, lighter, all-electric vehicles are far more appropriate. Heavy, steel bodies, built to carry four or five obscenely obese passengers are a complete joke. They are still trying to make the same early 20th century cars but with a spark symbol on the side like some re-badged, Buck Rogers iFizzler. It's a bit like saying your Rotten Apple iSlave is greener. Simply because it uses the same workers 60 hours a week, 7 days a week. All to save exhaled CO2 by workers commuting on their bicycles to the CommyCon factories from their mega-city slums. I wonder how the Chinese ComCorrupt party will feel when RottenApple starts bussing in black slaves from Africa? Unlikely? I imagine RottenApple must be sick of paying backhanders to the local ComCorrupt committee members to avoid embarrassing details like CommyCon's working practices being exposed. When does the first RottenApple iSlave factory open on the edge of some African mega-slum? Too many security problems? Just bring in a few CIA drones to keep the lid on things. If that doesn't work they can always mine the carefully manicured and constantly irrigated lawns under the suicide nets. Lock the doors on the workforce and chain them to their workbenches. Problems? End of. ;-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17557630 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
On Mar 30, 6:13*am, "Chris.B" wrote: On Mar 29, 10:51*pm, Al Wilson wrote: the new prius c is so cute - i want 2 take 1 home an give it lots of (((((hugs))))) xxxxxxx * my baby prius xxxxxx Y'all really don't have much imagination, do you? The Prius is not remotely green. pearl white, pure white, cabernet red, tyrol silver, nuvus gray, vermillion red, dark blue, astral black - true not green xxxxx It is rolling, marketing hype for middle class chumps in the absence of serious, all electric vehicles for the man and woman in the street. it is a sweet quiet ride even if 1 does not care about green, in any case i was talking about the "c" model of prius xxx The total CO2 load of producing the damned things makes a mockery of any saving in CO2 released at the dripping exhaust pipe. Particularly since it is usually recharged with coal-fired electricity. 1 cud apply that 2 all cars xx The vast majority of vehicles carry only the driver. Only over a relatively short journey to collect the next fix of sugar from the supermarket. So smaller, lighter, all-electric vehicles are far more appropriate. agreed xxx Heavy, steel bodies, built to carry four or five obscenely obese passengers are a complete joke. the perfect size for carrying a 10" dob to a dark sky site! xxx |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
On Mar 30, 1:38*pm, Al Wilson wrote:
the perfect size for carrying a 10" Dob to a dark sky site! xxx I can walk to a dark sky sight from my back door in less than 3 seconds. The only problem is the darkly coloured, parked car getting in the way. A 10" Dob on a suitable trailer can be easily towed behind a bicycle, Since the Dobsonian is named after a real person it deserves a capital D. And stop blowing me kisses! sigh |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
is he related to teh Dobson of the ozonometer?
I forgot to ask the telescope guy, when he came to our club, because I was more interested in the Moon Problem. Since the Dobsonian is named after a real person |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
newsflash: they are by source renewable,
whether or not we are extracting them at a renewable rate; thye are just biomass! Obviously you have been fully invested in hydrocarbons, so that's |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
One good thing NASA's Earth Explorer is doing (One of very fewgood things)
On Mar 26, 1:24*pm, "Chris.B" wrote:
On Mar 26, 5:19*am, Rich wrote: You stupid dope. *What do you suppose would happen if we ditched oil, coal, etc? *In addition to spending 50% of our income of B.S. alternate energy, the SAME kind of corporations who run oil would run wind and solar. *Fool. Whoah! Let's not be quite so quick to attack the dope. Wind and solar have the almost unique ability to provide independent energy free of the monster energy companies. Wind power is not practical on a small scale. http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2009/...t-results.html http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/04/3...ls-won’t-wash/ Of course any given solar panel will work less well in a dark, cloudy, northern clime such as Denmark than it would in a sunnier, more tropical country such as Bangladesh. Without the corrosive demand for ever higher quarterly payments mankind could suddenly find itself severed from the treadmill of work. Treadmill of work: http://www.energybulletin.net/storie...ot-sustainable No need to commute for miles merely to keep warm and enjoy the benefits of electricity. There are other benefits to commuting. One could also suggest that keeping warm is easier in a tropical country such as Bangladesh than it is in a dark, cold northern country such as Denmark. Much of which is wasted over very long supply cables and conversion from AC to DC in our domestic apparatus. It's funny you should mention that since Denmark imports so much of its electricity from Sweden. The world needs to save energy more than it needs to increase energy output. Tell that to the kids: http://www.spiked-online.com/index.p.../article/3788/ Why no global home insulation drive? Again, one could also suggest that keeping warm is easier in a tropical country such as Bangladesh than it is in a dark, cold northern country such as Denmark. Because it keeps us tied to the Big Providers. Africa is discovering oil just as we need their dirt cheap labour to make more **** as China becomes too expensive. Who will make the dirt cheap **** now? Robots? http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/after-ho...tory-40093752/ I'm not knocking Lego blocks, I had fun with them when I was a young child. Electric cars have now been touted as potential battery stores for our homes. Take transport (too) out of the list of holds which employment has over us and it all begins to look quite rosy. Why do we need coal and oil when we can live independent from them? Denmark gets about half of its electricity from coal plants some of which are owned by Sweden, which has nukes and hydro but no coal plants within its borders. Meanwhile, wind hasn't contributed much to Denmark's energy picture. And a good portion of Denmark's fuel use involves container shipping. This new found freedom should be top of the right wing political agenda if individual freedom really is their goal for all. Imagine a world where our actual working hours shrank back to that of the caveman? And our life expectancy as well. Also, cavemen got by without posting hourly rants on the Internet. What's your excuse? A world where self expression and real talents could find value to society again. Ugh. Og kill mammoth. Og eat leftover mammoth rest of life. Have time now draw on cave wall. Instead of being passive consumers and slaves to the treadmill we could all lead our own lives. Instead of merely contributing to the obscenity of the already, utterly pointlessly wealthy. Who, for the most part invest the money. It won't happen of course. We are all too addicted to wasting our lives away. Worshipping the infinite gradations of status and hierarchy. Filling our empty hours by collecting worthless, ephemeral detritus and paying to be amused by others less talented than ourselves. You should quit that. ? Even YouTube is changing its Open Contribution policy to something far more commercial and saleable. I blame TV for most of it. Before TV people made things for themselves and amused themselves with their own natural talents. CNC ended mechanical talent. TV the ability to think for oneself. Hobbies became something other people did. Such as, for example, amateur astronomy? While we passively looked on. Bemused and critical by turns on our TVs. Or scribbling semi-literate, obscene comments on YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tar4V4t4ADA I suggest that all Denmarkians load up their windmills, solar panels, bicycles, Lego blocks, any spare treadle pumps they may have lying around, and emigrate to Bangladesh. Once there, they can let the Bangladeshis scrap the ships, while the Denmarkians set up the solar panels and operate the treadle pumps. With the Denmarkians now shouldering the burden of operating the treadle pumps and other tasks, the Bangladeshi children can spend time getting an education and with the solar panels set up, there will be enough light for them to do homework after sunset. Freed from a cold climate, the Denmarkians will no longer have to worry about staying warm, saving quite a bit of fuel. Who knows, the Swedes might even learn to get by with just hydroelectric plants! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I've been hearing nothing but good things..... | Art Linkletter | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | February 23rd 09 09:34 PM |
Skywatcher Explorer 130M - any good? | TSS | UK Astronomy | 18 | December 16th 03 08:41 PM |
Really good things about a really bad winter | Starstuffed | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | November 25th 03 10:29 PM |