|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
When you don't look at the moon, it doesn't exist.
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 12:47:22 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote: On 19/04/2019 3:35 am, The Starmaker wrote: Sylvia Else wrote: On 18/04/2019 2:13 pm, The Starmaker wrote: Sylvia Else wrote: On 18/04/2019 2:36 am, The Starmaker wrote: Sylvia Else wrote: On 17/04/2019 2:26 pm, The Starmaker wrote: The moon does NOT exist when WE don't look at it. don't tell me i have to explain it to you? What causes the tides when we're not looking at the moon? Sylvia. If yous not looking how do you know there are tides? I can see the tides if I look at the water. Perhaps you want to change your claim to "The moon does NOT exist when WE don't look at it, or at the tides it produces." Sylvia. The moon does not contain a force to move tides.. How do you account for the tides then, and why do they follow the position of the moon? The tides is caused by gravity. The moon does not produce gravity. The moon is not a gravity machine....it's just a rock that just happens to be between the sun and the earth. The tides don't follow the position of the moon, they follow the force of gravity that is being caused from the sun, the earth and the moon in between. You seem to be contradicting yourself. Is the moon involved in the gravity, or not? Sylvia. I did write the moon is "in between"...so you can say, entangled. 'involved' sounds too romantic..Sylvia. If you don't look at the tides...it doesn't exist. It only forms together to form a tide once you look at it. Can you predict the next wave? -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable. Earth has high tide on the side facing the moon and also a high tide on the other side facing away That's a little tricky. Reality is if there were no humans looking at the universe it need not be.Thus I'll say it again."Universe created man so it could see itself." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
When you don't look at the moon, it doesn't exist.
On Monday, April 22, 2019 at 6:32:55 PM UTC-5, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, April 20, 2019 at 12:47:22 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote: Sylvia Else wrote: On 19/04/2019 3:35 am, The Starmaker wrote: Sylvia Else wrote: On 18/04/2019 2:13 pm, The Starmaker wrote: Sylvia Else wrote: On 18/04/2019 2:36 am, The Starmaker wrote: Sylvia Else wrote: On 17/04/2019 2:26 pm, The Starmaker wrote: The moon does NOT exist when WE don't look at it. don't tell me i have to explain it to you? What causes the tides when we're not looking at the moon? Sylvia. If yous not looking how do you know there are tides? I can see the tides if I look at the water. Perhaps you want to change your claim to "The moon does NOT exist when WE don't look at it, or at the tides it produces." Sylvia. The moon does not contain a force to move tides.. How do you account for the tides then, and why do they follow the position of the moon? The tides is caused by gravity. The moon does not produce gravity. The moon is not a gravity machine...it's just a rock that just happens to be between the sun and the earth. The tides don't follow the position of the moon, they follow the force of gravity that is being caused from the sun, the earth and the moon in between. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When you don't look at the moon, it doesn't exist. | Mark Earnest[_2_] | Misc | 4 | April 23rd 19 02:34 PM |
When you don't look at the moon, it doesn't exist. | palsing[_2_] | Misc | 0 | April 19th 19 04:16 AM |
When you don't look at the moon, it doesn't exist. | Mark Earnest[_2_] | Misc | 0 | April 18th 19 08:08 PM |
When you don't look at the moon, it doesn't exist. | Mark Earnest[_2_] | Misc | 0 | April 18th 19 06:41 PM |
entropy....doesn't exist. | Notroll2016 | Misc | 0 | September 22nd 16 08:26 PM |