When you don't look at the moon, it doesn't exist.

On Thursday, April 18, 2019 at 12:34:26 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:

On 18/04/2019 2:13 pm, The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:

On 18/04/2019 2:36 am, The Starmaker wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:

On 17/04/2019 2:26 pm, The Starmaker wrote:
The moon does NOT exist when WE don't look at it.

don't tell me i have to explain it to you?

What causes the tides when we're not looking at the moon?

Sylvia.



If yous not looking how do you know there are tides?



I can see the tides if I look at the water.

Perhaps you want to change your claim to "The moon does NOT exist when
WE don't look at it, or at the tides it produces."

Sylvia.


The moon does not contain a force to move tides..



How do you account for the tides then, and why do they follow the
position of the moon?

The tides is caused by gravity.


The moon does not produce gravity. The moon is not a gravity machine...it's just a rock that
just happens to be between the sun and the earth.

The tides don't follow the position of the moon, they follow the force of gravity
that is being caused from the sun, the earth and the moon in between.

If you take a comb
and comb your hair
and move it near
water
the water will...wave.

The water is positive charged, and the gravity is negative charged.


But, but ..When you don't look at the moon, it doesn't exist. It requires an observer to exist.

What if half of all people are looking and the other half are not?