|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Canon A70 instead? (was Canon S400 ok for astro?)
In article ,
Esmail Bonakdarian wrote: John Steinberg wrote: Esmail Bonakdarian wrote: The camera is the Canon PowerShot S400. I used one, briefly, recently. Thought it was well made and fairly feature rich. Only problem, for me, was that it's a wee bit too small. Hi John, Well, I made the track to the local Best Buy and was simply surprised how tiny the S400 is. Now I am thinking of getting the A70 instead. While it's only 3.2 megapixels instead of 4, it does have full manual controls, and a video mode of 640x480 (instead 320x200 for the S400). I am thinking that the video mode might come in handy for collecting and then later stacking images, but I know very little about astro photography at this point. This camera might give me a good starting point for exploring. Still, having full control over settings is a plus. And the camera isn't so tiny that I might forget or step on it ;-) but still not a big huge hunk of technology. And it's $100-150 cheaper. I can't see why I would need to have 4 megapixels at this point. I don't plan on printing poster sized pics, mostly just put them on-line and print out a few in "regular" print size (5x7?). The reason you might want 4 megtapixels is for cropping daytime photos. Especially with moving objects (like kids) I find myself mostly using the camera zoomed out (wide angle), and later cropping away the extraneous parts of the image on my computer. If you throw away the outer half of a 4 MP image, you still have a 2 MP image left. If you ever print 8x10s, 2 MP is about the minimum. So, using a camera with more pixels than you need functions as a useful type of digital zoom. The worst thying to do is zoom in, and then mmiss your subject because they move. Another reason for favoring the wide end of the zoom is its faster f/ratio. As an example, the S400 is f/2.8 at its wide end, but only f/4.9 at its telephoto end. Large flash cards (I use a 256 MB card in my S400) are cheap enough, so in-camera storage isn't a problem. As for its small size, the benefit is pocketabiliity -- carrrying it in your pocket whenever you go somewhere that might be interesting. I wonder if anyone has used the Canon A70 successfully for some astro pics ... I certainly would try out various things. Esmail --- Esmail Bonakdarian - esmailATmyrealboxDOTcom - http://www.cs.mercer.edu/bonak 32N 83W |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Canon A70 instead? (was Canon S400 ok for astro?)
I've been using a Canon Powershot A70 camera for a couple of months
now and have had much success. Wonderful stills of Saturn, Mars, Jupiter and the moon have exceeded my expectations. I've been using a camera/eyepiece clamp up to now, but I am anxiously awaiting delivery of a Digi-T camera adapter. All shots were taken through a 10" f/5 newtonian on a GEM - no drive - with a 6mm eyepiece. Exposure times for the major planets generally range from 1/30 to 1/100 sec so drift is no problem. Using the camera 10 second self-timer however, is a must. I've tried video of Saturn and the moon with so-so results. It seems my first (and only) attemt to date was thwarted by poor focus (my fault) and clouds (mother nature's fault). Nonetheless, some frame grabs look promising. Just as soon as these clouds clear, I'll be outside trying again. Would I recommend the A70 ... absolutely! Mike On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:09:21 -0500, Esmail Bonakdarian wrote: John Steinberg wrote: Esmail Bonakdarian wrote: The camera is the Canon PowerShot S400. I used one, briefly, recently. Thought it was well made and fairly feature rich. Only problem, for me, was that it's a wee bit too small. Hi John, Well, I made the track to the local Best Buy and was simply surprised how tiny the S400 is. Now I am thinking of getting the A70 instead. While it's only 3.2 megapixels instead of 4, it does have full manual controls, and a video mode of 640x480 (instead 320x200 for the S400). I am thinking that the video mode might come in handy for collecting and then later stacking images, but I know very little about astro photography at this point. This camera might give me a good starting point for exploring. Still, having full control over settings is a plus. And the camera isn't so tiny that I might forget or step on it ;-) but still not a big huge hunk of technology. And it's $100-150 cheaper. I can't see why I would need to have 4 megapixels at this point. I don't plan on printing poster sized pics, mostly just put them on-line and print out a few in "regular" print size (5x7?). I wonder if anyone has used the Canon A70 successfully for some astro pics ... I certainly would try out various things. Esmail --- Esmail Bonakdarian - esmailATmyrealboxDOTcom - http://www.cs.mercer.edu/bonak 32N 83W |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon S400 ok for astro? | Alson Wong | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | October 25th 03 03:07 PM |
Canon EOS Rebel Digital | Tdcarls | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | September 22nd 03 07:58 PM |
Canon IS binocs/Nikon Superior E/Fuji 16x70. | David McHarg | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | August 14th 03 11:39 PM |