Chapt22 layered ages of the Cosmos #386 Atom Totality 4th ed

Chapter 22
layered age of Cosmos with 6.5 billion years new Cosmos, Plutonium
Atom Totality layer, yet old*galaxies of the Uranium Atom Totality
20.2 billion years old;


It used to be in the late 1990s that the best supporting evidence for
the Atom Totality theory was not the Tifft quantized galaxy speeds
nor
the blackbody Cosmic microwave background radiation nor the missing
mass, but the age of the Cosmos and the age of the oldest stars.


I am recounting the history of the 1990s as best my memory can
recall.
The Freedman team was working on the age of the overall Cosmos and
the
Sandage team profiled the age of the oldest stars. And when the
Freedman team announced publically worldwide their findings if I
remember correctly they said the Cosmos was 8 billion years old.
While
years prior, Sandage had kept getting older and older ages for stars
and was approaching 20 billion years.


So right away, since the world was deeply in love with the Big Bang
theory, that the pressure was on for Freedman to scale up or fudge
up
her 8 billion years and for Sandage to fudge down his 20 billion
years.
If you thought corporate corruption of cooking the books or fudging
the
data in corporate America in the late 1990s with Enron and WorldCom
were outrageous, well in my estimation what Freedman and Sandage did
for ages of Cosmos and stars, in my opinion was on the same level of
reason gone berserk.


In the Big Bang theory, of course, if Freedman says the Cosmos is 8
billion years old and Sandage says the oldest star is 20 billion
years
old before the fudging, of course that makes no sense. But in the
Atom
Totality theory,
you see, the Universe is layers of age, like a onion or tree rings is
layers of age
growth. So that the Sandage 20 billion year old (correct me if wrong
but memory was some Cepheid variables or was it supernova?) stars
could
have been the older layer of the Uranium Atom Totality and where
Freedman was getting an age of the overall Cosmos as 8 billion years
old because she was measuring the newer layer of the Universe-- the
Plutonium Atom Totality layer.


So in an Atom Totality the universe is layered ages and thus the
Freedman and Sandage reports favor the Atom Totality. And here we
have
a case of where scientist are disobeying the profession of science
itself. That the data is true and correct and the theory has to be
adjusted or discarded of the Big Bang. And that the moment
scientists
fudge their data to converge in the middle with one age, well, they
stopped being scientists.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies