UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

In article , (peter) wrote:
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
f=1/time f=1/dt

Nope. Try again.

snip

(Tom Kerr) wrote in message ...
In article , (peter) wrote:
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
f=1/time f=1/dt

Nope. Try again.


what do you mean .Try again


snip

"peter" wrote in message
om...
(Tom Kerr) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(peter) wrote:
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
f=1/time f=1/dt

Nope. Try again.


what do you mean .Try again


What he means is that when f = 1/time, then you can not say f=1/dt. In fact,
you can NEVER say f=1/dt since that is the same as saying that f =
undefined.

Are we thinking to fast for you, Peter ? ;o)

Clear Skies,
Magnus



snip

(peter) wrote in message om...
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
f=1/time f=1/dt

substituting into equation for force due to linear motion
F=mvf

for stream of radiated particle
F is multipled with intensity particle of emitted particle
where i represents intensity particle
F=mvfi

intensity particle i
i=intensity*field area

Intensity
defined asthe rate at which radiation energy is transferred per
unit area.

2)force due to attraction between like particle(inter-particle
attraction)

F=x^2/4kPIr^2

k-permittivity of particle through a medium
r-distance between the attracting body
f-frequency of particle radiated inthe field
v-speed of the particle radiated
m-mass of particle
i-intensity particle of radiation in the field
a-absorbance particle of radiation in the field
x-activity of particle radiated in the field
PI-22/7
x^2=(a*i)/f

absorbance particle a
a=absorption*field area

absorption
defined as the rate at which radiation energy absorbed per unit area



This forces act opposite to each other
Hence the difference between this two force we get the net force
acting on a particle under linear motion
net forcce (F)

F= x^2/4kPIr^2-mvfi

DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION FOR ENERGY
Energy can simply be defined as the ability to do work (SI unit joule)

Work=force*distance
force=mass*acceleration
distance=change in velocity*change in time

From equation of force due to linear motion of emitted particle.
F=mvfi
work=f*d
d=vt

therefore
work=mv^2fit
but
f=1/t
substituting in to equation of work above we get

work=mv^2i for stream of particle emitted

work=mv^2 for one ray radiated

from equation of force of attraction between like particle

F=x^2/4kPIr^2

work=f*d
d=r
therefore
work=x^2/4kPIr

the net energy of any field radiated

net E =x^2/4kPIr-mv^2i

for photo v=c

there fore net E=x^2/4kPIr-mc^2i

NB
when Enistein derived E=mc^2
he do not known of attraction forces between the like particle
which,this inter-particular attraction between like particle are very
important in facilitating the general attraction in any field.they
convery attraction force between two body as they are radiated from
one body and absorbed in the other body.

When Enistein derived E=mc^2
the derivation was based on linear motion of particle,has i have
shown above in equation E=mv^2 where v=c for photon
therefore E=mc^2 this equation is for one ray of radiation
but for stream of photo we get
E=mc^2i
i-intensity of photon radiated
THE NET ENERGY I DERIVED

net E=x^2/4kPIr-mc^2i

Is the total energy possess by emitted stream photon

energy possess by one ray of emitted photon

net E=1/4kPIr-mc^2 x^2=1 and i=1 for a single radiation

Enistein equation of energy E=mc^2 only represent the energy due to
linear motion of photon in electromagnetic field not the net energy
possess by radiated photon.


Enistein equation of E=mc^2 is not accurate

it is
E=1/4kPIr-mc^2
For field radiation


APPLICATION OF UNIVERSAL FIELD EQUATION TO DETERMINE THE FREQUENCY OF
ELECTROSTATIC FIELD PARTICLE FOR ELECTROSTATIC FIELD AROUND A FREE
ELECTRON

Electrostatic force of attaction due to a free electron.
F=e^2/4kPIr^2--------------(1)
Universal equation of force
F= X^2/4kPIr^2-mvfi----------(2)
Equating equation 1 to equation 2

e^2/4kPIr^2=x^2/4kPIr^2-mvfi

e^2=x^2-4kPIr^2mvfi---------(3)
Radiation field energy

E=hf------------------------(4)

Therefore the field equation electrons electrostatic field is

hf=(x^2- 4kPIr^2mvfi)/4kPIr---------(5)
Substituting equation (3) into equation (5)

hf=e^2/4kPIr--------------------------(6)

Known h---planks constant
e---Electron charge
k---Electrostatic field permittivity of free space
PI--pie=22/7
r---radius of an electron
The frequency of electrostatic field particle emitted can be
calculated from the equation below

f=e^2h/4kPIr----------------(7)

In article , (peter) wrote:
(Tom Kerr) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(peter) wrote:
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
f=1/time f=1/dt

Nope. Try again.

what do you mean .Try again

I really mean try again, i.e., derive your equation again. You can't just
redefine frequency and expect the rest of your derivation to work without
modifying it. Physically, f=1/dt is meaningless, especially when using your
own definition of dt=time.

"peter" wrote in message
om...
(peter) wrote in message
. com...
(peter) wrote in message
om...
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
frequency=1/change in time
f=1/dt

Derivation of
f=1/dt

angular velocity=angular displacement/change in time

Wrong! You are confusing the use of 'average' with the use of finite
elements.

Your statement should be "average angular velocity=angular
displacement/change in time", but this is not the same thing.


=2*PI/dt-----(j)

Still wrong!

angular velocity can also be state as

angular velocity =2*PI *f-----------(l)

Correct!

PI=22/7

Why using a simplistic 'round value' when your approximation is not used in
an example ?


angular displacement=2*PI

therefore
from equation (j) and (l)
2*PI/dt=2*PI*f

Sorry, but equation (j) is incorrectly derived!



when simpified

1/dt=f

Soo, again, wrong!

Clearly you do not understand how to calculate with finite elements. Please
do learn this (it is a BSc requirement!) before you continue.

Clear Skies,
Magnus

[...]

"Magnus Nyborg" wrote in message ...
"peter" wrote in message
om...
(peter) wrote in message
. com...
(peter) wrote in message
om...
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
frequency=1/change in time
f=1/dt

Derivation of
f=1/dt

angular velocity=angular displacement/change in time

Wrong! You are confusing the use of 'average' with the use of finite
elements.

Your statement should be "average angular velocity=angular
displacement/change in time", but this is not the same thing.



angular displacement=2*PI unit is radian

angular velocity =angular displacement/change in time =2*PI/dt-----(j)

Still wrong!

angular velocity can also be state as

angular velocity =2*PI *f-----------(l)

Correct!

PI=22/7

Why using a simplistic 'round value' when your approximation is not used in
an example ?


angular displacement=2*PI

therefore
from equation (j) and (l)
2*PI/dt=2*PI*f

Sorry, but equation (j) is incorrectly derived!



what do you mean


TRY CIRCULAR MOTION (PHYSIC)




when simpified

1/dt=f

Soo, again, wrong!

Clearly you do not understand how to calculate with finite elements. Please
do learn this (it is a BSc requirement!) before you continue.

Clear Skies,
Magnus

[...]

"peter" wrote in message
om...


frequency of radiating field particle f
change in time of radiating field particle t
f=1/dt
i mean
frequency =1/change in time
which can be proved from unit of frequency(second^-1)


Dt=change in time

Frequency is 1/T, where T is the period of oscillation;
the time between succeeding crests or troughs of the
wave. It is not a propogation time, nor an arbitrary
elapsed time. You are confusing various time parameters
because you are not properly defining your terms before
plunging ahead with your mathematics.

Formulae mean nothing if the parameters and variables
are not strictly defined.

"peter" wrote in message
om...
"Magnus Nyborg" wrote in message
...
"peter" wrote in message
om...
(peter) wrote in message
. com...
(peter) wrote in message
om...
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
frequency=1/change in time
f=1/dt

Derivation of
f=1/dt

angular velocity=angular displacement/change in time

Wrong! You are confusing the use of 'average' with the use of finite
elements.

Your statement should be "average angular velocity=angular
displacement/change in time", but this is not the same thing.



angular displacement=2*PI unit is radian

angular velocity =angular displacement/change in time =2*PI/dt-----(j)

Try to understand that dt is a differential element. It is
by definition of infinitessimal size. What you want here is
the period, T, of one cycle of the wave or rotation.

This is not the same as an arbitrary elapsed time, t, which
you wish to use in your further derivations. You have
confused the two things, rendering your derivation specious.

"Magnus Nyborg" wrote in message ...
"peter" wrote in message
om...
(peter) wrote in message
. com...
(peter) wrote in message
om...
DERIVATION OF UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE

when field particle are emitted there are two force acting
1)Force due to linear motion of the particle emitted

from defination of force
F=ma a=dv/dt
F=m dv/dt

frequency(f)
defined as the rate of repetition of regular event.
unit hertz or second^-1

therfore
frequency=1/change in time
f=1/dt

Derivation of
f=1/dt

angular velocity=angular displacement/change in time

Wrong! You are confusing the use of 'average' with the use of finite
elements.

Your statement should be "average angular velocity=angular
displacement/change in time", but this is not the same thing.


=2*PI/dt-----(j)

Still wrong!

angular velocity can also be state as

angular velocity =2*PI *f-----------(l)

Correct!

PI=22/7

Why using a simplistic 'round value' when your approximation is not used in
an example ?


angular displacement=2*PI

therefore
from equation (j) and (l)
2*PI/dt=2*PI*f

Sorry, but equation (j) is incorrectly derived!



when simpified

1/dt=f

Soo, again, wrong!

Clearly you do not understand how to calculate with finite elements. Please
do learn this (it is a BSc requirement!) before you continue.

Clear Skies,
Magnus

[...]
Field particle are in orbital path before they are emitted into linear
motion.

Therefore there are two way of deriving f=1/dt
1)from circular motion
2)from linear motion

If your not understanding how i derived f=1/dt from circular motion
Let me derive from motion which is much simpler.


DERIVATION FROM LINEAR VELOCITY OF EMITTED PARTICLE

f=1/dt


linear velocity= d/dt-------------(E)


The distance between two linearly radiated particle in the field = d

The change in time =dt


linear velocity=wavelenght*frequency-------------(W)

wavelenght is the distance between two particle linearly radiated =d

from equation (E) and (W)



linear velocity=wavelenght*frequency=d/dt

therefore
wavelenght*frequency=d/dt--------------(S)

but the wavelenght=distance between the emitted particle=d


substituting wavelenght with d into equation (S)

d*f=d/dt
therefore

f=1/dt



If the derivation is not clear tell me were your have not understand
so that i can elaborate before we can proced to the derivation of
UNIVERSAL EQUATION OF FIELD PARTICLE.