A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Science Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Moral Equivalent Of A Space Program



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #33  
Old February 15th 06, 09:25 AM posted to sci.space.moderated,sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moral Equivalent Of A Space Program

In article ,
Fred J. McCall wrote:
Seems to me that it's expensive enough to get mass up there that we
ought to plan on not bringing it back.


And a space station, in particular, *wants* to be as heavy as possible --
that reduces the effect of air drag and hence the frequency of reboosts.

(The average annual reboost fuel consumption is, to a good first
approximation, unaffected. The reboosts take more fuel each, but they're
less frequent.)
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. |

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope EFLASPO Amateur Astronomy 0 April 1st 04 03:26 PM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 February 2nd 04 03:33 AM
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective Jason Donahue Amateur Astronomy 3 February 1st 04 03:33 AM
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective Astronaut Misc 0 January 31st 04 03:11 AM
NASA Selects International Space Station Program Scientis Ron Baalke Science 0 August 20th 03 06:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.