|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Shuttle program extension?
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:02:46 -0400, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: Titanic had many ships within hours' travel of rescue The Californian was within sight (her radioman had gone to sleep and distress rockets were ignored by her captain, another change after Titanic was that all large ships have their radios manned 24 hours a day) and the Carpathia arrived on scene just after sunrise. ISS cannot expect to have other ships available to rescue the crew within a reasonable amount of time. Then either that has to change, or the assumption that it's a requirement has to change. It won't. Get over it. You may as well say that Carnival Cruises can stop putting lifeboats on their ships. Never gonna happen. As I pointed out, there are already scenarios where lifeboats won't do you much good. But you provide a lifeboat to handle as much as you practically can. Practical being the key word. There are always going to be events that happen too quickly for lifeboats to help, at sea and in space. The Andrea Doria was listing too far over for half her lifeboats to be launched in 1956 (the passengers were fortunately rescued by the nearby Ile de France). We didn't say "See! Lifeboats aren't a 100% guarantee! Get rid of them!". The government already sends hundreds of employees out on craft which have rescue capabilities that are far more feel good than actually useful. One of our own here served on one such craft. You're wrong about submarines, Greg. They do have lifeboats, the same as all Navy ships (you don't see lifeboats hanging all along the sides of the Nimitz, either). For example, take a look at "Hunt for Red October" to see inflatable lifeboats in action (the scene was filmed on a Brit sub, I think). They have been used in real life, too. Being able to "deliver all the way back to Southampton" is a lot cheaper for NASA than having a Carpathia on standby for launch 24/7. Or is it? Seriously. I do wonder if anyone has looked at the cost of either developing a rescue craft for the next 4-5 years, We don't need to develop a rescue craft. We just need to accellerate Orion. paying the Russians That's still a lifeboat that gets you back to Southampton. It's just not one the US builds. Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shuttle program extension? | Flyguy | Space Shuttle | 175 | September 22nd 08 04:18 PM |
No Shuttle launch, Shuttle program mothballed? | Widget | Policy | 1 | July 4th 06 03:51 PM |
The shuttle program needs some comedy!!! | Steve W. | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 9th 05 09:59 PM |
More Evidence The Shuttle Program Should Be Scrapped | John Slade | Space Shuttle | 7 | August 2nd 05 04:35 AM |
Question regarding the end of the Shuttle program | JazzMan | Space Shuttle | 23 | February 19th 04 02:21 AM |