|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shuttle program extension?
Thankfully both McCain and Obama have sent a letter to the
administration and Dr. Griffin to put the decision on hold to retire the shuttle for 1 year... why... because everyone can see the "coolness" developing. Its just silly to think that if we have a direct conflict with Russia that they will continue the space relationship with NASA beyond what is necessary. This is especially true if sanctions occur. Which is unlikely, unless the Russians invade the rest of Georgia, which is possible. Depending on how much Putin is feeling his cheerios. So Shuttle should continue to be made available to the USA and our European and Japanese partners so we don't have a repeat Skylab experience and watch the ISS drop out of the sky and burn into a million pieces while the press destroys NASA for the failure of ISS. NASA can't and won't let this happen, if Orion is put on hold for 5 years oh well, welcome to the real world of geopolitics, the space programs very familiar and old hunting ground. This will definitely probably stop Atlantis from being mothballed. As a bonus this will give time to work out Orion and Ares 5 problems that may not have been able to occur before the current time table. As for the facilities if necessary Launch Pad C could always be built. Why not, all the blueprints are in the vault aren't they? Don't answer that last question. Its just something that's possible as all things are like just retooling the existing Apollo base design and redoing the electronics. Welcome back... to ideas that are proven. Jonathan On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 08:46:57 GMT, "Brian Gaff" wrote: Hang on a moment, I seem to recall that Mike Griffin did in fact say a long time ago that there was no fundamental reason why it could not fly, except that at some point the tooling for tanks etc, and the modification to the pads for the next craft may mean that some decision were to be made on this, it would have to be fairly fast. In my view, its the apparent disagreement with Russia over policies on the ground etc, which may have made this a higher priority. After all, you can hardly fly Americans on Soyuz, if you are daggers drawn over policies in Eastern Europe. From over here, I cannot see why the US seems to be going out of its way to annoy Russia, if the boot, so to speak was on the other foot regarding missile bases and for that matter, a neighbouring country threatening etchic Americans (OK no such thing) I'm sure the response would have been very similar. Anyway, I think I said back in the start, that they may wish to fly longer. The bottom line really is the bottom line though, and that is will it be funded as well as Orion, or is the return to the moon etc, going to be quietly forgotten? The are old and someone needs to make a long term decision not overturn by any administration coming up in a few years. Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shuttle program extension? | Flyguy | Space Shuttle | 175 | September 22nd 08 04:18 PM |
No Shuttle launch, Shuttle program mothballed? | Widget | Policy | 1 | July 4th 06 03:51 PM |
The shuttle program needs some comedy!!! | Steve W. | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 9th 05 09:59 PM |
More Evidence The Shuttle Program Should Be Scrapped | John Slade | Space Shuttle | 7 | August 2nd 05 04:35 AM |
Question regarding the end of the Shuttle program | JazzMan | Space Shuttle | 23 | February 19th 04 02:21 AM |