A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

M40 / Winnecke 4



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 11th 07, 04:53 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,uk.sci.astronomy
Anthony Ayiomamitis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default M40 / Winnecke 4

Dear Friends,

Perhaps the strangest entry in Messier's catalog is M40 which is the
double star Winnecke 4. Although some interesting and attractive
galaxies exist in the immediate area, they are too faint to have been
visible with Messier's equipment and, as such, something else must have
distracted Messier for him to catalogue this entry.

For those interested, please see http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-DSO-M40.htm
..... taken under noticeable winds and seeing which fluctuated dramatically.

Clear skies!

Anthony.
  #2  
Old April 11th 07, 05:28 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,uk.sci.astronomy
Paul Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 53
Default M40 / Winnecke 4

I note the 'obvious' faint galaxy is about mag 17.4,,,
,,,very nice field.
Paul
"Anthony Ayiomamitis" wrote in message
...
Dear Friends,

Perhaps the strangest entry in Messier's catalog is M40 which is the
double star Winnecke 4. Although some interesting and attractive galaxies
exist in the immediate area, they are too faint to have been visible with
Messier's equipment and, as such, something else must have distracted
Messier for him to catalogue this entry.

For those interested, please see http://www.perseus.gr/Astro-DSO-M40.htm
.... taken under noticeable winds and seeing which fluctuated
dramatically.

Clear skies!

Anthony.



  #3  
Old April 11th 07, 10:41 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,uk.sci.astronomy
Ben
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default M40 / Winnecke 4

On Apr 11, 10:53 am, Anthony Ayiomamitis
wrote:
Dear Friends,

Perhaps the strangest entry in Messier's catalog is M40 which is the
double star Winnecke 4. Although some interesting and attractive
galaxies exist in the immediate area, they are too faint to have been
visible with Messier's equipment and, as such, something else must have
distracted Messier for him to catalogue this entry.

For those interested, please seehttp://www.perseus.gr/Astro-DSO-M40.htm
.... taken under noticeable winds and seeing which fluctuated dramatically.

Clear skies!

Anthony.


Antoni,

I have puzzled over Messier's inclusion of this object.
The inclusion of M 73 (6994) falls under the same riddle
and they both seem to suggest that Messier's telescope
was suffering from a legion of ills.

A fine image to say the least and thanks for the post.

Ben

  #4  
Old April 11th 07, 11:34 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,uk.sci.astronomy
Anthony Ayiomamitis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default M40 / Winnecke 4

Ben wrote:

On Apr 11, 10:53 am, Anthony Ayiomamitis
wrote:

Dear Friends,

Perhaps the strangest entry in Messier's catalog is M40 which is the
double star Winnecke 4. Although some interesting and attractive
galaxies exist in the immediate area, they are too faint to have been
visible with Messier's equipment and, as such, something else must have
distracted Messier for him to catalogue this entry.

For those interested, please seehttp://www.perseus.gr/Astro-DSO-M40.htm
.... taken under noticeable winds and seeing which fluctuated dramatically.

Clear skies!

Anthony.



Antoni,

I have puzzled over Messier's inclusion of this object.
The inclusion of M 73 (6994) falls under the same riddle
and they both seem to suggest that Messier's telescope
was suffering from a legion of ills.


.... or perhaps the owner was smoking some (illegal) stuff while cruising
the skies. :-)


A fine image to say the least and thanks for the post.


Thanks.

Anthony.


Ben

  #5  
Old April 12th 07, 12:11 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,uk.sci.astronomy
Odysseus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 154
Default M40 / Winnecke 4

In article ,
Anthony Ayiomamitis wrote:

Ben wrote:


snip

I have puzzled over Messier's inclusion of this object.
The inclusion of M 73 (6994) falls under the same riddle
and they both seem to suggest that Messier's telescope
was suffering from a legion of ills.


... or perhaps the owner was smoking some (illegal) stuff while cruising
the skies. :-)


What would have been illegal to smoke in the eighteenth century?

--
Odysseus
  #6  
Old April 12th 07, 12:18 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,uk.sci.astronomy
Anthony Ayiomamitis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 377
Default M40 / Winnecke 4

Odysseus wrote:

In article ,
Anthony Ayiomamitis wrote:


Ben wrote:



snip

I have puzzled over Messier's inclusion of this object.
The inclusion of M 73 (6994) falls under the same riddle
and they both seem to suggest that Messier's telescope
was suffering from a legion of ills.


... or perhaps the owner was smoking some (illegal) stuff while cruising
the skies. :-)



What would have been illegal to smoke in the eighteenth century?


Hehehehe ... good point. :-)

Anthony.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M40 / Winnecke 4 Anthony Ayiomamitis Amateur Astronomy 7 April 14th 07 07:45 AM
What did I see? Pons-Winnecke? Lord Calvert Misc 8 July 2nd 04 08:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.