|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ranging and Pioneer
"Spud" wrote in message
oups.com... gr-qc/0102103 is worth a look I believe that analysis may be incomplete. It really looks at the effect on ranging when using the round trip time rather than the Doppler technique which was actually used. The diagram at the end of the paper shows the Earth moving round the Sun. I have drawn a more detailed version showing the Earth and the points of transmission and reception: http://www.georgedishman.f2s.com/Pio...neerHubble.png The two paths, red and blue, show individual wave crests of the carrier [1] with the red path being emitted first and with times subscripted with 'a'. The times of events follow the convention used by Anderson et al: t1 transmit t2 transpond t3 receive. The frequency of transmit signal is therefore f_tx = 1 / (t_b1 - t_a1) which is known of course, while that of the received signal is f_rx = 1 / (t_b3 - t_a3) The speed (more precisely "range rate", the time derivative of the path length) is inferred from the ratio f_tx/f_rx [2] by v = (f_tx / f_rx - 1) * c hence v = ((t_b3-t_a3)/(t_b1-t_a1)-1) * c The anomalous acceleration is then the amount by which the derivative dv/dt differs from the value it would have in a non-expanding scenario where H_0 = 0. What I believe has been overlooked in gr-qc/0102103 is there will be an "expansion of space", notably of the distance between the Earth and the craft in accordance with the usual cosmological scale factor a(t) during the time the signals are in flight. I'm not up to handling GR but taking a macroscopic view, I think the end result of the above should be close to 2*H*v which is much larger than the range value given in the above paper but still about four orders smaller than the observed anomaly. It would be interesting to know if that 'educated guess' works out. George [1] This ignores the transponder ratio of 240/221 but is equivalent if the red and blue paths on the uplink are cycles 221 apart while on the downlink they are 240 cycles apart: f_tx = 221 / (t_b1 - t_a1) f_rx = 240 / (t_b3 - t_a3) v = ( (240/221)*(f_tx/f_rx) - 1) * c hence as above v = ((t_b3-t_a3)/(t_b1-t_a1)-1) * c [2] This is the opposite of the normal convention as speeds away from Earth are treated as positive by JPL but cause a reduction in received frequency. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ranging and Pioneer | Oh No | Research | 87 | September 26th 06 09:25 PM |
Ranging and Pioneer | George Dishman | Research | 0 | August 6th 06 10:12 AM |
Ranging and Pioneer | Steve Willner | Research | 0 | August 5th 06 02:14 PM |
30 Years of Pioneer Spacecraft Data Rescued: The Planetary Society Enables Study of the Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly | [email protected] | News | 0 | June 6th 06 05:35 PM |