#1
|
|||
|
|||
Current theories?
I'm wondering what the currently accepted thinking in the scientific community is on a couple of items, and hope y'all will indulge & enlighten me. 1) _Why_ is the earth's axis tilted? I understand the result (seasonal weather, etc.), but how & when did it get tilted in the first place? 2) How did the moon form? When? 3) Is 4.5 billion years still the best estimate of the age of the earth, and how was it arrived at? TIA for any and all reasoned responses. Jim, "Entropy never sleeps; do y'all?" The above address is invalid; send email to fesser at same domain name. http://community.webtv.net/IronDuff/SpringBreak http://community.webtv.net/a968/ContinentalDivide http://community.webtv.net/a968/TennentMountain |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Jim wrote:
I'm wondering what the currently accepted thinking in the scientific community is on a couple of items, and hope y'all will indulge & enlighten me. 1) _Why_ is the earth's axis tilted? I understand the result (seasonal weather, etc.), but how & when did it get tilted in the first place? Why not? Mars' axis is also tilted, and so are the axes of other planets. The way in which the planets condensed isn't necessarily that precise. 2) How did the moon form? When? I think the most favored current theory is that early in the formation of the solar system, the proto-Earth got hit by something the size of Mars. 3) Is 4.5 billion years still the best estimate of the age of the earth, and how was it arrived at? The oldest known rocks are about 3 billion years old. They are dated through long-lived and common radioisotopes such as those of thorium, found in small quantities in granite. Thorium decays to substances chemically distinct from it, so they wouldn't end up in exactly the same spot except through decay. Perhaps it would take a molten Earth about 1.5 billion years to cool down enough to form rocks, but I do suspect there is more to it than that. John Savard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Jim wrote:
snip 1) _Why_ is the earth's axis tilted? I understand the result (seasonal weather, etc.), but how & when did it get tilted in the first place? A planet "tipping" over can also be the result spin-orbit resonances building up over geologic time. Think of a wobbling spinning top you used as a child. The general rule might be the opposite from common-sense intutition. Unless there is some force working against spin resonance, most planets will "tip over" relative their star system's ecliptic plane. For example the obliquity of moonless Venus is 178=B0; Uranus is 97.9=B0. The Earth's Moon contributed to the habitability of Earth that we now enjoy. The Moon acts as dampener that soaks up the spin-resonances of the Earth's wobble. This constraints the Earth to a relatively even keel with a maximum tilt of around 24=B0 with respect to the ecliptic. That keeps the seasons habitably even. The Earth would not be a very nice place to live if the South Pole pointed toward the Sun. Table of the obliquity of planets and their major moons http://www.physics.vanderbilt.edu/as...tary_data.html See thread and my post in this usenet group for further references: Topic: If We Had No Large Moon, would we Rotate like Venus? Begun by: TerryS Aug 16, 2004, 1:30am My response with references: Aug 16, 2004, 6:37pm Google usenet engine Message-ID: Use search terms "obliquity planets" in internet search engines for more information. A good general reading level book - Comins, Niel F. 1993. What if the moon didn't exist : voyages to earths that might have been. HarperCollins.=20 - Peace Canopus56 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
1) _Why_ is the earth's axis tilted? I understand the result (seasonal
weather, etc.), but how & when did it get tilted in the first place? See below. 2) How did the moon form? When? Early collision between earth and smaller object --- roughly the size of Mars. Collision would scatter lighter mantle material of both earth and impactor into earth orbit where it would become the moon. This also produces the tilt of earth axis. Look around at the other planets and notice unusual tilts and/or "day" orbit and you can see where it might have happened to others. At one point this was thought to be ridiculous as it needed a big catastrophe. But if you stop and think of the accretion process, it is inevitable that you have some big collisions. 3) Is 4.5 billion years still the best estimate of the age of the earth, and how was it arrived at? Yes. Dating metorites. Clear Skies Chuck Taylor Do you observe the moon? Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/ Are you interested in understanding optics? Try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ATM_Optics_Software/ To reply, remove Delete and change period com to period net TIA for any and all reasoned responses. Jim, "Entropy never sleeps; do y'all?" The above address is invalid; send email to fesser at same domain name. http://community.webtv.net/IronDuff/SpringBreak http://community.webtv.net/a968/ContinentalDivide http://community.webtv.net/a968/TennentMountain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Schumann Resonance bioeffects real? | cons_cie | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 26th 04 09:28 PM |
Females will create all important new theories in the future | nightbat | Misc | 21 | April 19th 04 09:46 AM |
Conspiracy theories about space and other subjects | Sven Grahn | History | 6 | February 18th 04 03:56 PM |
Current Splitter Tapes | Tony Sivori | SETI | 6 | February 12th 04 03:36 AM |